Let the function

1

be analytic in the unit disk Δ = {z│ │z│ ≤ 1), with

there, and let α be a real number. Then f(z) is said to be α-convex in Δ if and only if the inequality

holds in Δ. The class of α-convex functions was introduced in [8] and was studied in detail in the series [5]–[10], where in particular it is shown that α-convex functions are univalent and starlike for all α (−∞≦ α ≦ + ∞), that is, the inequality

holds in Δ.

Let (Q, +, ·) be a finite quasifield of dimension d over its kernel K = GF(q), where q = pk with p a prime and k ≧ 1. (See p. 18-22 and p. 74 of [7] or Section 5 of [9] for the definition of quasifield.) For the remainder of this article we will follow standard conventions and omit, whenever possible, the binary operations + and · in discussing a quasifield. For example, the notation Q will be used in place of the triple (Q, +, ·) and Q* will be used to represent the multiplicative loop (Q − {0}, ·).

Let m be a non-zero element of the quasifield Q; the right multiplicative mapping ρm:Q → Q is defined by

1

In 1924 at the Toronto meeting of the International Congress of Mathematicians, B. N. Delone introduced his empty sphere method for lattices. We have titled our paper after this method as a tribute to his memory.

We have studied the sets of integer solutions of equations of the form

1

where f satisfies the following condition in which Z denotes the integers,

2

and have resolved this problem using the theory of L-types of lattices [3, 4, 11]. We have been able to give a complete description of all such integer solutions when n ≦ 4.

In [4] N. Steinmetz used Nevanlinna theory to establish remarkably versatile theorems on the factorization of ordinary differential equations which implied numerous previous results of various authors. (Here factorization is taken in the sense of function composition as introduced by F. Gross in [2].) The thrust of Steinmetz’ central results on factorization is that if g(z) is entire and f(z) is meromorphic in C such that the composite fog satisfies an algebraic differential equation, then so do f(z) and, degenerate cases aside, g(z). In addition, the more one knows about the equation for fog (e.g. degree, weight, autonomy), the more one can conclude about the equations for f and g.

In this note we generalize Steinmetz’ work to show the following:

• a) Steinmetz’ two basic results, Satz 1 and Korollar 1 of [4] can be seen as one-variable specializations of a single two variable result, and

• b) the function g(z) can itself be allowed to be a function of several variables.

Let KO and KU respectively denote the real and complex periodic K-theory spectra [1, Part III]. Let KSC denote the spectrum representing self-conjugate K-theory [2, G]. Thus we have a fibring

1.1

where T is induced by complex conjugation on the unitary group.

The following result is due to R. Wood [1, p. 206] and, I believe, to D. W. Anderson.

1.2. PROPOSITION. Let generate the stable one-stem. Then there are weak equivalences of spectra

a

and

b

Relatively little is known about simple, Type III, right self-injective rings Q. This is despite their common occurrence, for example as Qmax(R) for any prime, nonsingular, countable-dimensional algebra R without uniform right ideals. (In particular Q can be constructed with a given field as its centre.) As with their directly finite, SP(1), right self-injective counterparts, division rings, there are few obvious invariants apart from the centre.

One reason perhaps why little interest has been shown in their structure is that the usual construction of such Q, namely as a suitable Qmax(R), is not concrete enough; in general R sits far too loosely inside Q and not enough information transfers to Q from R. Thus, for example, taking R to be a non-right-Ore domain and Q = Qmax(R) tells us little about Q (although it has been conjectured that all Q arise this way).

Kaplansky proposed in [7] three problems with which to test the adequacy of a proposed structure theory of infinite abelian groups. These problems can be rephrased as test problems for a structure theory of operators on Hilbert space. Thus, R. Kadison and I. Singer answered in [6] these test problems for the unitary equivalence of operators. We propose here a study of these problems for quasisimilarity of operators on Hilbert space. We recall first that two (bounded, linear) operators T and T′ acting on the Hilbert spaces and , are said to be quasisimilar if there exist bounded operators and with densely defined inverses, satisfying the relations T′X = XT and TY = YT′. The fact that T and T′ are quasisimilar is indicated by T ∼ T′. The problems mentioned above can now be formulated as follows.

Stationary logic L(aa) is obtained for Lωω by adding a quantifier aa which ranges over countable sets and is interpreted to mean “for a closed unbounded set of countable subsets”. The dual quantifier for aa is stat, i.e., stat sφ(s) is equivalent to ¬aa s ¬φ(s). In the study of the L(aa)-model theory of structures a particular well behaved class was isolated, the finitely determinate structures. These are structures in which the quantifier “stat” can be replaced by the quantifier “aa” without changing the validity of sentences. Many structures such as R and all ordinals are finitely determinate. In this paper we will be concerned with finitely determinate first order theories, i.e., those theories all of whose models are finitely determinate.

Example 0.1. [5] The theory of dense linear orderings is not finitely determinate. Let S be a stationary costationary subset of ω1 and

where

Let be a topological projective plane with compact point set P of finite (covering) dimension. In the compact-open topology (of uniform convergence), the group Σ of continuous collineations of is a locally compact transformation group of P.

THEOREM. If dim Σ > 40, thenis isomorphic to the Moufang plane 6 over the real octonions (and dim Σ = 78).

By [3] the translation planes with dim Σ = 40 form a one-parameter family and have Lenz type V. Presumably, there are no other planes with dim Σ = 40, cp. [17].

Let π be a set of primes and let G be a π-separable group (all groups considered are finite). Two subsets Xπ(G) and Bπ(G) of the set Irr(G) of irreducible characters of G play an important role in the character theory of π-separable groups and particularly solvable groups. If p is prime and π is the set of all other primes, then the Bπ characters of G give a natural one-to-one lift of the Brauer characters of G into Irr(G). More generally, they have been used to define Brauer characters for sets of primes.

The π-special characters of G (i.e., Xπ(G)) restrict irreducibly and in a one-to-one fashion to a Hall-π-subgroup of G. If an irreducible character χ is quasi-primitive, it factors uniquely as a product of a π-special character an a π′-special character. This is a particularly useful tool in solvable groups.

In this paper we study the spaces X having the property that the space of free loops on X is equivalent in some sense to the product of X by the space of based loops on X. We denote by ΛX the space of all continuous maps from S1 to X, with the compact-open topology. ΩX denotes, as usual, the loop space of X, i.e., the subspace of ΛX formed by the maps from S1 to X which map 1 to the base point of X.

If G is a topological group then every loop on G can be translated to the base point of G and the space of free loops ΛG is homeomorphic to G × ΩG. More generally, any H-space has this property up to homotopy. Our purpose is to study from a homotopy point of view the spaces X for which there is a homotopy equivalence between ΛX and X × ΩX which is compatible with the inclusion ΩX ⊂ ΛX and the evaluation map ΛX → X.

We call a subset X of a group an elliptic set if there is an integer n such that each element of the group generated by X can be written as a product of at most n elements of X ∪ X−1. The terminology is due to Philip Hall, who investigated elliptic sets in lectures given in Cambridge in the 1960's. Hall was chiefly interested in sets X which are unions of conjugacy classes, but among other things he proved that if H, K are subgroups of a finitely generated nilpotent group then their union H ∪ K is elliptic. We shall say that a subgroup H of an arbitrary group G is elliptically embedded in G, and we write H ee G, if H ∪ K is an elliptic set for each subgroup K of G. Thus H ee G if for each subgroup K there is an integer n (depending on K) such that

where the product has 2n factors.

In this paper we consider free actions of finite cyclic groups on the pair (S3, K), where K is a knot in S3. That is, we look at periodic diffeo-morphisms f of (S3, K) such that fn is fixed point free, for all n less than the order of f. Note that such actions are always orientation preserving. We will show that if K is a non-trivial prime knot then, up to conjugacy, (S3, K) has at most one free finite cyclic group action of a given order. In addition, if all of the companions of K are prime, then all of the free periodic diffeo-morphisms of (S3, K) are conjugate to elements of one cyclic group which acts freely on (S3, K). More specifically, we prove the following two theorems.

THEOREM 1. Let K be a non-trivial prime knot. If f and g are free periodic diffeomorphisms of (S3, K) of the same order, then f is conjugate to a power of g.

In this paper we determine closed-form expressions for the associated Jacobi polynomials, i.e., the polynomials satisfying the recurrence relation for Jacobi polynomials with n replaced by n + c, for arbitrary real c ≧ 0. One expression allows us to give in closed form the [n — 1/n] Padé approximant for what is essentially Gauss' continued fraction, thus completing the theory of explicit representations of main diagonal and off-diagonal Padé approximants to the ratio of two Gaussian hypergeometric functions and their confluent forms, an effort begun in [2] and [19]. (We actually give only the [n — 1/n] Padé element, although other cases are easily constructed, see [19] for details.)

We also determine the weight function for the polynomials in certain cases where there are no discrete point masses. Concerning a weight function for these polynomials, so many writers have obtained so many partial results that our formula should be considered an epitome rather than a real discovery, see the discussion in Section 3.

In this paper we shall be concerned with arcs of divisible semiplanes. With one exception, all known divisible semiplanes D (also called “elliptic” semiplanes) arise by omitting the empty set or a Baer subset from a projective plane Π, i.e., D = Π\S, where S is one of the following:

• (i) S is the empty set.

• (ii) S consists of a line L with all its points and a point p with all the lines through it.

• (iii) S is a Baer subplane of Π.

We will introduce a definition of “arc” in divisible semiplanes; in the examples just mentioned, arcs of D will be arcs of Π that interact in a prescribed manner with the Baer subset S omitted. The precise definition (to be given in Section 2) is chosen in such a way that divisible semiplanes admitting an abelian Singer group (i.e., a group acting regularly on both points and lines) and then a relative difference set D will always contain a large collection of arcs related to D (to be precise, —D and all its translates will be arcs).