Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:37:36.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Divisible Semiplanes, Arcs, and Relative Difference Sets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Dieter Jungnickel*
Affiliation:
Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, Giessen, F.R. Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper we shall be concerned with arcs of divisible semiplanes. With one exception, all known divisible semiplanes D (also called “elliptic” semiplanes) arise by omitting the empty set or a Baer subset from a projective plane Π, i.e., D = Π\S, where S is one of the following:

  • (i) S is the empty set.

  • (ii) S consists of a line L with all its points and a point p with all the lines through it.

  • (iii) S is a Baer subplane of Π.

We will introduce a definition of “arc” in divisible semiplanes; in the examples just mentioned, arcs of D will be arcs of Π that interact in a prescribed manner with the Baer subset S omitted. The precise definition (to be given in Section 2) is chosen in such a way that divisible semiplanes admitting an abelian Singer group (i.e., a group acting regularly on both points and lines) and then a relative difference set D will always contain a large collection of arcs related to D (to be precise, —D and all its translates will be arcs).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1987

References

0. Baker, R. D., An elliptic semiplane, J. Comb. Th. (A) 25 (1978), 193195.Google Scholar
1. Beth, Th., Jungnickel, D. and Lenz, H., Design theory (Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim-Wien-Zùrich, 1985 and Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986.)Google Scholar
2. Bose, R. C., An affine analogue of Singer's theorem, J. Ind. Math. Soc. 6 (1942), 115.Google Scholar
3. Dembowski, P., Finite geometries (Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Denniston, R. H. F., Subplanes of the Hughes plane of order 9, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 64 (1968), 589598.Google Scholar
5. Denniston, R. H. F., On arcs in projective planes of order 9, Manuscripta Mathematica 4 (1971), 6189.Google Scholar
6. Elliott, J. E. H. and Butson, A. T., Relative difference sets, Illinois J. Math. 10 (1966), 517531.Google Scholar
7. Ganley, M. J., On a paper of Demhoski and Ostrom, Arch. Math. 27 (1976), 9398.Google Scholar
8. Ganley, M. J. and Spence, E., Relative difference sets and quasiregular collineation groups, J. Comb. Th. (A) 19 (1975), 134153.Google Scholar
9. Hirsehfeld, J. W. P., Projective geometries over finite fields (Oxford University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
10. Hughes, D. R., Partial difference sets, Amer. J. Math. 78 (1956), 650674.Google Scholar
11. Hughes, D. R., A class of non-Desarguesian projective planes, Can. J. Math. 9 (1957), 278288.Google Scholar
12. Hughes, D. R. and Piper, F. C., Projective planes (Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1973).Google Scholar
13. Jungniekel, D., On automorphism groups of divisible designs, Can. J. Math. 34 (1982), 257297.Google Scholar
14. Jungniekel, D., On a theorem of Ganley, Graphs and Comb. 3 (1987), 141143.Google Scholar
15. Jungniekel, D., A note on affine difference sets, Arch. Math. 47 (1986), 279280.Google Scholar
16. Jungniekel, D. and Vanstone, S. A., Conical embeddings of Steiner systems S(3, 2a + 1; 2ab + 1), to appear in Rand. Cire. Palermo.Google Scholar
17. Jungniekel, D. and Vedder, K., On the geometry of planar difference sets, Europ. J. Comb. 5 (1984), 143148.Google Scholar
18. Ko, H. P. and Ray-Chaudhuri, D. K., Multiplier theorems, J. Comb. Th. (A) 30 (1981), 134157.Google Scholar
19. Ko, H. P. and Ray-Chaudhuri, D. K., Intersection theorems for group divisible difference sets, Diser. Math. 39 (1982), 3758.Google Scholar
20. Lam, C. W. H., On relative difference sets, Congressus Numerantium 20 (1977), 645674.Google Scholar
21. Martin, G. E., On arcs in a finite projective plane. Can. J. Math. 19 (1967), 376393.Google Scholar
22. Quist, B., Some remarks concerning curves of the second degree on a finite plane, Ann. Aead. Soi. Fenn. Ser. AI 134 (1952).Google Scholar
23. Segre, B., Ovals in a finite projective plane, Can. J. Math. 7 (1955), 414416.Google Scholar
24. Singer, J., A theorem on finite projective geometry and some applications to number theory. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 43 (1938), 377385.Google Scholar