Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Adam-Troian, Jais
Çelebi, Elif
Bonetto, Eric
Taşdemir, Nagihan
and
Yurtbakan, Taylan
2020.
Together we stand? Belonging motive moderates the effect of national ingroup salience on attitudes towards ethnic minorities.
International Journal of Intercultural Relations,
Vol. 77,
Issue. ,
p.
95.
Fabrigar, Leandre R.
Wegener, Duane T.
and
Petty, Richard E.
2020.
A Validity-Based Framework for Understanding Replication in Psychology.
Personality and Social Psychology Review,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 4,
p.
316.
Gollwitzer, Mario
and
Schwabe, Johannes
2022.
Context Dependency as a Predictor of Replicability.
Review of General Psychology,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 2,
p.
241.
Zambonato, Adriane
and
Pérez-Nebra, Amalia Raquel
2022.
Negative Events and Biochemical Markers: Test for the Moderating Effect of Humor.
Trends in Psychology,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 1,
p.
172.
De Boeck, Paul
Pek, Jolynn
Walton, Katherine
Wegener, Duane T.
Turner, Brandon M.
Andersen, Barbara L.
Beauchaine, Theodore P.
Lecavalier, Luc
Myung, Jay I.
and
Petty, Richard E.
2023.
Questioning Psychological Constructs: Current Issues and Proposed Changes.
Psychological Inquiry,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 4,
p.
239.
Target article
Making replication mainstream
Related commentaries (36)
A Bayesian decision-making framework for replication
A pragmatist philosophy of psychological science and its implications for replication
An argument for how (and why) to incentivise replication
Bayesian belief updating after a replication experiment
Conceptualizing and evaluating replication across domains of behavioral research
Constraints on generality statements are needed to define direct replication
Data replication matters to an underpowered study, but replicated hypothesis corroboration counts
Direct replication and clinical psychological science
Direct replications in the era of open sampling
Don't characterize replications as successes or failures
Enhancing research credibility when replication is not feasible
Holding replication studies to mainstream standards of evidence
How to make replications mainstream
If we accept that poor replication rates are mainstream
Introducing a replication-first rule for Ph.D. projects
Making prepublication independent replication mainstream
Making replication prestigious
Putting replication in its place
Replication is already mainstream: Lessons from small-N designs
Replications can cause distorted belief in scientific progress
Scientific progress is like doing a puzzle, not building a wall
Selecting target papers for replication
Strong scientific theorizing is needed to improve replicability in psychological science
The costs and benefits of replication studies
The importance of exact conceptual replications
The meaning of a claim is its reproducibility
The replicability revolution
Three strong moves to improve research and replications alike
Three ways to make replication mainstream
To make innovations such as replication mainstream, publish them in mainstream journals
Verifiability is a core principle of science
Verify original results through reanalysis before replicating
What have we learned? What can we learn?
What the replication reformation wrought
Why replication has more scientific value than original discovery
You are not your data
Author response
Improving social and behavioral science by making replication mainstream: A response to commentaries