Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Gomila, Robin
and
Paluck, Elizabeth Levy
2020.
The social and psychological characteristics of norm deviants: A field study in a small cohesive university campus.
Journal of Social and Political Psychology,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 1,
p.
220.
Martinez, Joel E.
Funk, Friederike
and
Todorov, Alexander
2020.
Quantifying idiosyncratic and shared contributions to judgment.
Behavior Research Methods,
Vol. 52,
Issue. 4,
p.
1428.
Guyon, Hervé
2021.
Quantification in Experimental Psychology and Pragmatic Epistemology: Tension Between the Scientific Imperative and the Social Imperative.
Frontiers in Psychology,
Vol. 11,
Issue. ,
Wu, Sherry Jueyu
Yuhan Mei, Bruce
and
Cervantez, Jose
2022.
Preferences and Perceptions of Workplace Participation: A Cross-Cultural Study.
Frontiers in Psychology,
Vol. 13,
Issue. ,
Imam, Abdulrazaq A.
2022.
Remarkably reproducible psychological (memory) phenomena in the classroom: some evidence for generality from small-N research.
BMC Psychology,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 1,
Wu, Sherry Jueyu
and
Paluck, Elizabeth Levy
2022.
Having a voice in your group: Increasing productivity through group participation.
Behavioural Public Policy,
p.
1.
GOMILA, ROBIN
SHEPHERD, HANA
and
PALUCK, ELIZABETH LEVY
2023.
Network insiders and observers: who can identify influential people?.
Behavioural Public Policy,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 1,
p.
115.
Lutfor, Afzalunnessa Binte
Jahan, Fauzia
Siddiqui, Tosaddeque Hossain
Chowdhury, Kona
Ahmad, Rahnuma
Nusrat, Nadia
Akter, Farhana
Adnan, Nihad
Islam, Salequl
Kumar, Santosh
Sharma, Paras
Lugova, Halyna
Etando, Ayukafangha
Sultana, Irin
Sarkar, Sajuti
Begum, Firoza
Chowdhury, Chand Sultana
Mou, Taslin Jahan
Nahar, Shamsun
Zaman, Taslima
Sharmin, Sabrina
Mashrur, Abu Rushd Muhammad
Kabir, Rumana
Biswas, Nirmal Kanti
Halder, Kakali
Basu, Kamalesh Chandra
Ferdousy, Sybilla
Hassan, Mahmuda
ARM, Lutful Kabir
Begum, Mahamuda
Khan, Naurin
Andalib, Sofia
Munwar, Shaila
Alim, Rumana
Khan, Samia Afreen
Noor, Neelima Sharmin
Rahaman, Md. Arifur
Kabir, Fuad Reajwan
Yesmin, Farida
Bashar, Mohammad Abul
Islam, Mohammad Ataul
Taher, Tania
Ahmed, Tarafder Shahniam
Khan, Jahangir Alam
Ahammed, Ferdaus
Chowdhury, Shajia
Akhtar, Gulshan
Sinha, Susmita
Godman, Brian
and
Haque, Mainul
2023.
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Education of Medical, Dental and Non-Medical Healthcare Professionals in Bangladesh: Findings and Connotation.
Advances in Human Biology,
Vol. 13,
Issue. Suppl 1,
p.
S85.
Target article
Making replication mainstream
Related commentaries (36)
A Bayesian decision-making framework for replication
A pragmatist philosophy of psychological science and its implications for replication
An argument for how (and why) to incentivise replication
Bayesian belief updating after a replication experiment
Conceptualizing and evaluating replication across domains of behavioral research
Constraints on generality statements are needed to define direct replication
Data replication matters to an underpowered study, but replicated hypothesis corroboration counts
Direct replication and clinical psychological science
Direct replications in the era of open sampling
Don't characterize replications as successes or failures
Enhancing research credibility when replication is not feasible
Holding replication studies to mainstream standards of evidence
How to make replications mainstream
If we accept that poor replication rates are mainstream
Introducing a replication-first rule for Ph.D. projects
Making prepublication independent replication mainstream
Making replication prestigious
Putting replication in its place
Replication is already mainstream: Lessons from small-N designs
Replications can cause distorted belief in scientific progress
Scientific progress is like doing a puzzle, not building a wall
Selecting target papers for replication
Strong scientific theorizing is needed to improve replicability in psychological science
The costs and benefits of replication studies
The importance of exact conceptual replications
The meaning of a claim is its reproducibility
The replicability revolution
Three strong moves to improve research and replications alike
Three ways to make replication mainstream
To make innovations such as replication mainstream, publish them in mainstream journals
Verifiability is a core principle of science
Verify original results through reanalysis before replicating
What have we learned? What can we learn?
What the replication reformation wrought
Why replication has more scientific value than original discovery
You are not your data
Author response
Improving social and behavioral science by making replication mainstream: A response to commentaries