No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
How to make replications mainstream
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 July 2018
Abstract
Zwaan et al. integrated previous articles to promote making replications mainstream. We wholeheartedly agree. We extend their discussion by highlighting several existing initiatives – the Replication Recipe and the Collaborative Education and Research Project (CREP) - which aim to make replications mainstream. We hope this exchange further stimulates making replications mainstream.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018
References
Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., Grange, J. A., Perugini, M., Spies, J. & van ‘t Veer, A. (2014) The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 50:217–24.Google Scholar
Ghelfi, E., Christopherson, C. D., Fischer, M. A., Legate, N., Lenne, R., Urry, H., Wagemans, F. M. A., Wiggins, B., Barrett, T., Glass, M., Guberman, J., Hunt, J., Issa, N., Paulk, A., Peck, T., Perkinson, J., Sheelar, K., Theado, R. & Turpin, R. (in preparation) The influence of gustatory disgust on moral judgement: A pre-registered multi-lab replication.Google Scholar
Grahe, J. E., Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Cohoon, J., Peng, C., Detweiler-Bedell, B. & Weisberg, Y. (2015) Collaborative Replications and Education Project (CREP). Available at: http://osf.io/wfc6u.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T. & Steinberg, L. (1988) A reaction to Greenwald, Pratkanis, Leippe, and Baumgardner (1986): Under what conditions does research obstruct theory progress? Psychological Review 95:566–71.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., Pratkanis, A. R., Leippe, M. R. & Baumgardner, M. H. (1986) Under what conditions does theory obstruct research progress? Psychological Review 93:216.Google Scholar
Leighton, D. C., Legate, N., LePine, S., Anderson, S. F. & Grahe, J. (2018) Self-esteem, self-disclosure, self-expression, and connection on Facebook: A collaborative replication meta-analysis. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research 23:98–109.Google Scholar
Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y. & Lindsay, D. S. (2017) Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science 12:1123–28. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630.Google Scholar
Wagge, J., Johnson, K., Meltzer, A., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., IJzerman, H. & Grahe, J. E. (in preparation). Elliott et al.'s (2011) “Red, rank, and romance” effect: A meta-analysis of CREP replications.Google Scholar
Target article
Making replication mainstream
Related commentaries (36)
A Bayesian decision-making framework for replication
A pragmatist philosophy of psychological science and its implications for replication
An argument for how (and why) to incentivise replication
Bayesian belief updating after a replication experiment
Conceptualizing and evaluating replication across domains of behavioral research
Constraints on generality statements are needed to define direct replication
Data replication matters to an underpowered study, but replicated hypothesis corroboration counts
Direct replication and clinical psychological science
Direct replications in the era of open sampling
Don't characterize replications as successes or failures
Enhancing research credibility when replication is not feasible
Holding replication studies to mainstream standards of evidence
How to make replications mainstream
If we accept that poor replication rates are mainstream
Introducing a replication-first rule for Ph.D. projects
Making prepublication independent replication mainstream
Making replication prestigious
Putting replication in its place
Replication is already mainstream: Lessons from small-N designs
Replications can cause distorted belief in scientific progress
Scientific progress is like doing a puzzle, not building a wall
Selecting target papers for replication
Strong scientific theorizing is needed to improve replicability in psychological science
The costs and benefits of replication studies
The importance of exact conceptual replications
The meaning of a claim is its reproducibility
The replicability revolution
Three strong moves to improve research and replications alike
Three ways to make replication mainstream
To make innovations such as replication mainstream, publish them in mainstream journals
Verifiability is a core principle of science
Verify original results through reanalysis before replicating
What have we learned? What can we learn?
What the replication reformation wrought
Why replication has more scientific value than original discovery
You are not your data
Author response
Improving social and behavioral science by making replication mainstream: A response to commentaries