Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Blunden, Anthea G.
Howe, Piers D. L.
and
Little, Daniel R.
2020.
Evidence that within-dimension features are generally processed coactively.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
Vol. 82,
Issue. 1,
p.
193.
Zuidersma, Marij
Riese, Harriëtte
Snippe, Evelien
Booij, Sanne H.
Wichers, Marieke
and
Bos, Elisabeth H.
2020.
Single-Subject Research in Psychiatry: Facts and Fictions.
Frontiers in Psychiatry,
Vol. 11,
Issue. ,
Robayo-Pinzon, Oscar
Foxall, Gordon R.
Montoya-Restrepo, Luz Alexandra
and
Rojas-Berrio, Sandra
2021.
Does excessive use of smartphones and apps make us more impulsive? An approach from behavioural economics.
Heliyon,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 2,
p.
e06104.
Ince, Robin AA
Paton, Angus T
Kay, Jim W
and
Schyns, Philippe G
2021.
Bayesian inference of population prevalence.
eLife,
Vol. 10,
Issue. ,
Imam, Abdulrazaq A.
2022.
Remarkably reproducible psychological (memory) phenomena in the classroom: some evidence for generality from small-N research.
BMC Psychology,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 1,
Jaworska, Katarzyna
Yan, Yuening
van Rijsbergen, Nicola J
Ince, Robin AA
and
Schyns, Philippe G
2022.
Different computations over the same inputs produce selective behavior in algorithmic brain networks.
eLife,
Vol. 11,
Issue. ,
Wiles, Lisa
Cowie, Sarah
Bizo, Lewis
and
Sakakibara, Manabu
2023.
Not bird-brained: Chickens use prior experience to solve novel timing problems.
PLOS ONE,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
e0282667.
Al-Hoorie, Ali H.
Hiver, Phil
Larsen-Freeman, Diane
and
Lowie, Wander
2023.
From replication to substantiation: A complexity theory perspective.
Language Teaching,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 2,
p.
276.
Target article
Making replication mainstream
Related commentaries (36)
A Bayesian decision-making framework for replication
A pragmatist philosophy of psychological science and its implications for replication
An argument for how (and why) to incentivise replication
Bayesian belief updating after a replication experiment
Conceptualizing and evaluating replication across domains of behavioral research
Constraints on generality statements are needed to define direct replication
Data replication matters to an underpowered study, but replicated hypothesis corroboration counts
Direct replication and clinical psychological science
Direct replications in the era of open sampling
Don't characterize replications as successes or failures
Enhancing research credibility when replication is not feasible
Holding replication studies to mainstream standards of evidence
How to make replications mainstream
If we accept that poor replication rates are mainstream
Introducing a replication-first rule for Ph.D. projects
Making prepublication independent replication mainstream
Making replication prestigious
Putting replication in its place
Replication is already mainstream: Lessons from small-N designs
Replications can cause distorted belief in scientific progress
Scientific progress is like doing a puzzle, not building a wall
Selecting target papers for replication
Strong scientific theorizing is needed to improve replicability in psychological science
The costs and benefits of replication studies
The importance of exact conceptual replications
The meaning of a claim is its reproducibility
The replicability revolution
Three strong moves to improve research and replications alike
Three ways to make replication mainstream
To make innovations such as replication mainstream, publish them in mainstream journals
Verifiability is a core principle of science
Verify original results through reanalysis before replicating
What have we learned? What can we learn?
What the replication reformation wrought
Why replication has more scientific value than original discovery
You are not your data
Author response
Improving social and behavioral science by making replication mainstream: A response to commentaries