Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Pietschnig, Jakob
Siegel, Magdalena
Eder, Junia Sophia Nur
and
Gittler, Georg
2019.
Effect Declines Are Systematic, Strong, and Ubiquitous: A Meta-Meta-Analysis of the Decline Effect in Intelligence Research.
Frontiers in Psychology,
Vol. 10,
Issue. ,
Nuijten, Michèle B.
and
Polanin, Joshua R.
2020.
“statcheck”: Automatically detect statistical reporting inconsistencies to increase reproducibility ofmeta‐analyses.
Research Synthesis Methods,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 5,
p.
574.
Kaufmann, Esther
2020.
How accurately do teachers’ judge students? Re-analysis of Hoge and Coladarci (1989) meta-analysis.
Contemporary Educational Psychology,
Vol. 63,
Issue. ,
p.
101902.
Page, Matthew J.
Moher, David
Fidler, Fiona M.
Higgins, Julian P. T.
Brennan, Sue E.
Haddaway, Neal R.
Hamilton, Daniel G.
Kanukula, Raju
Karunananthan, Sathya
Maxwell, Lara J.
McDonald, Steve
Nakagawa, Shinichi
Nunan, David
Tugwell, Peter
Welch, Vivian A.
and
McKenzie, Joanne E.
2021.
The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence.
Systematic Reviews,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 1,
Fletcher, Samuel C.
2021.
The role of replication in psychological science.
European Journal for Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 1,
Samota, Evanthia Kaimaklioti
and
Davey, Robert P.
2021.
Knowledge and Attitudes Among Life Scientists Toward Reproducibility Within Journal Articles: A Research Survey.
Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics,
Vol. 6,
Issue. ,
Hardwicke, Tom E.
Bohn, Manuel
MacDonald, Kyle
Hembacher, Emily
Nuijten, Michèle B.
Peloquin, Benjamin N.
deMayo, Benjamin E.
Long, Bria
Yoon, Erica J.
and
Frank, Michael C.
2021.
Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal
Psychological Science
: an observational study
.
Royal Society Open Science,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 1,
Nuijten, Michèle
2021.
The New Common.
p.
161.
de Winter, J.C.F.
Petermeijer, S.M.
Kooijman, L.
and
Dodou, D.
2021.
Replicating five pupillometry studies of Eckhard Hess.
International Journal of Psychophysiology,
Vol. 165,
Issue. ,
p.
145.
Heirene, Robert M.
2021.
A call for replications of addiction research: which studies should we replicate and what constitutes a ‘successful’ replication?.
Addiction Research & Theory,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 2,
p.
89.
Nuijten, Michèle B.
2022.
Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology.
p.
379.
Laurinavichyute, Anna
Yadav, Himanshu
and
Vasishth, Shravan
2022.
Share the code, not just the data: A case study of the reproducibility of articles published in the Journal of Memory and Language under the open data policy.
Journal of Memory and Language,
Vol. 125,
Issue. ,
p.
104332.
Nosek, Brian A.
Hardwicke, Tom E.
Moshontz, Hannah
Allard, Aurélien
Corker, Katherine S.
Dreber, Anna
Fidler, Fiona
Hilgard, Joe
Kline Struhl, Melissa
Nuijten, Michèle B.
Rohrer, Julia M.
Romero, Felipe
Scheel, Anne M.
Scherer, Laura D.
Schönbrodt, Felix D.
and
Vazire, Simine
2022.
Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science.
Annual Review of Psychology,
Vol. 73,
Issue. 1,
p.
719.
Bakker, Bert N.
2023.
The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology.
p.
21.
Kaufmann, Esther
and
Harpaz, Gal
2024.
Teachers’ judgment accuracy: A replication check by psychometric meta-analysis.
PLOS ONE,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 7,
p.
e0307594.
Luijken, K.
Lohmann, A.
Alter, U.
Claramunt Gonzalez, J.
Clouth, F. J.
Fossum, J. L.
Hesen, L.
Huizing, A. H. J.
Ketelaar, J.
Montoya, A. K.
Nab, L.
Nijman, R. C. C.
Penning de Vries, B. B. L.
Tibbe, T. D.
Wang, Y. A.
and
Groenwold, R. H. H.
2024.
Replicability of simulation studies for the investigation of statistical methods: the RepliSims project.
Royal Society Open Science,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 1,
Nuijten, Michèle B.
and
Wicherts, Jelte M.
2024.
Implementing Statcheck During Peer Review Is Related to a Steep Decline in Statistical-Reporting Inconsistencies.
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 2,
Wendelborn, Christian
Anger, Michael
and
Schickhardt, Christoph
2024.
Promoting Data Sharing: The Moral Obligations of Public Funding Agencies.
Science and Engineering Ethics,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 4,
Clift, Georgia
Beaudry, Jennifer
Leung, Sumie
and
Kaufman, Jordy
2024.
Verification report: Egalitarianism in young children.
Infant and Child Development,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 4,
Target article
Making replication mainstream
Related commentaries (36)
A Bayesian decision-making framework for replication
A pragmatist philosophy of psychological science and its implications for replication
An argument for how (and why) to incentivise replication
Bayesian belief updating after a replication experiment
Conceptualizing and evaluating replication across domains of behavioral research
Constraints on generality statements are needed to define direct replication
Data replication matters to an underpowered study, but replicated hypothesis corroboration counts
Direct replication and clinical psychological science
Direct replications in the era of open sampling
Don't characterize replications as successes or failures
Enhancing research credibility when replication is not feasible
Holding replication studies to mainstream standards of evidence
How to make replications mainstream
If we accept that poor replication rates are mainstream
Introducing a replication-first rule for Ph.D. projects
Making prepublication independent replication mainstream
Making replication prestigious
Putting replication in its place
Replication is already mainstream: Lessons from small-N designs
Replications can cause distorted belief in scientific progress
Scientific progress is like doing a puzzle, not building a wall
Selecting target papers for replication
Strong scientific theorizing is needed to improve replicability in psychological science
The costs and benefits of replication studies
The importance of exact conceptual replications
The meaning of a claim is its reproducibility
The replicability revolution
Three strong moves to improve research and replications alike
Three ways to make replication mainstream
To make innovations such as replication mainstream, publish them in mainstream journals
Verifiability is a core principle of science
Verify original results through reanalysis before replicating
What have we learned? What can we learn?
What the replication reformation wrought
Why replication has more scientific value than original discovery
You are not your data
Author response
Improving social and behavioral science by making replication mainstream: A response to commentaries