Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Hu, Chuan-Peng
Jiang, Xiaoming
Jeffrey, Ricky
and
Zuo, Xi-Nian
2018.
Open science as a better gatekeeper for science and society: a perspective from neurolaw.
Science Bulletin,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 23,
p.
1529.
LeBel, Etienne P.
McCarthy, Randy J.
Earp, Brian D.
Elson, Malte
and
Vanpaemel, Wolf
2018.
A Unified Framework to Quantify the Credibility of Scientific Findings.
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 3,
p.
389.
Frankenhuis, Willem E.
and
Nettle, Daniel
2018.
Open Science Is Liberating and Can Foster Creativity.
Perspectives on Psychological Science,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 4,
p.
439.
Uher, Jana
2018.
Quantitative Data From Rating Scales: An Epistemological and Methodological Enquiry.
Frontiers in Psychology,
Vol. 9,
Issue. ,
Vazire, Simine
2018.
Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress.
Perspectives on Psychological Science,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 4,
p.
411.
Donnellan, M. Brent
and
Lucas, Richard E.
2018.
Introduction to the special issue – A replication project in personality psychology.
Journal of Research in Personality,
Vol. 72,
Issue. ,
p.
1.
Niven, Daniel J.
McCormick, T. Jared
Straus, Sharon E.
Hemmelgarn, Brenda R.
Jeffs, Lianne
Barnes, Tavish R. M.
and
Stelfox, Henry T.
2018.
Reproducibility of clinical research in critical care: a scoping review.
BMC Medicine,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 1,
Skulmowski, Alexander
and
Rey, Günter Daniel
2018.
Adjusting Sample Sizes for Different Categories of Embodied Cognition Research.
Frontiers in Psychology,
Vol. 9,
Issue. ,
Miłkowski, Marcin
Hensel, Witold M.
and
Hohol, Mateusz
2018.
Replicability or reproducibility? On the replication crisis in computational neuroscience and sharing only relevant detail.
Journal of Computational Neuroscience,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 3,
p.
163.
De Leeuw, Joshua
2019.
Similar event-related potentials to structural violations in music and language.
Meta-Psychology,
Vol. 3,
Issue. ,
Frank, Michael C.
2019.
Towards a more robust and replicable science of infant development.
Infant Behavior and Development,
Vol. 57,
Issue. ,
p.
101349.
Byrne, Kaileigh A.
Cornwall, Astin C.
and
Worthy, Darrell A.
2019.
Acute stress improves long-term reward maximization in decision-making under uncertainty.
Brain and Cognition,
Vol. 133,
Issue. ,
p.
84.
Tiokhin, Leonid
Hackman, Joseph
Munira, Shirajum
Jesmin, Khaleda
and
Hruschka, Daniel
2019.
Generalizability is not optional: insights from a cross-cultural study of social discounting.
Royal Society Open Science,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 2,
p.
181386.
Davis, Sara D.
Peterson, Daniel J.
Wissman, Kathryn T.
and
Slater, Wallis A.
2019.
Physiological stress and face recognition: Differential effects of stress on accuracy and the confidence–accuracy relationship..
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 3,
p.
367.
Bressan, Paola
2019.
Confounds in “Failed” Replications.
Frontiers in Psychology,
Vol. 10,
Issue. ,
Brown, Richard E.
2019.
Why Study the History of Neuroscience?.
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience,
Vol. 13,
Issue. ,
Tackett, Jennifer L.
Brandes, Cassandra M.
King, Kevin M.
and
Markon, Kristian E.
2019.
Psychology's Replication Crisis and Clinical Psychological Science.
Annual Review of Clinical Psychology,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 1,
p.
579.
Blank, Hartmut
Rutter, Lauren
and
Armstrong, Rebecca
2019.
Enlightenment beats prejudice: The reversibility of stereotype-induced memory distortion.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 3,
p.
1001.
Schmukle, Stefan C.
Korndörfer, Martin
and
Egloff, Boris
2019.
No evidence that economic inequality moderates the effect of income on generosity.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Vol. 116,
Issue. 20,
p.
9790.
Moran, James K.
Michail, Georgios
Heinz, Andreas
Keil, Julian
and
Senkowski, Daniel
2019.
Long-Range Temporal Correlations in Resting State Beta Oscillations are Reduced in Schizophrenia.
Frontiers in Psychiatry,
Vol. 10,
Issue. ,
Target article
Making replication mainstream
Related commentaries (36)
A Bayesian decision-making framework for replication
A pragmatist philosophy of psychological science and its implications for replication
An argument for how (and why) to incentivise replication
Bayesian belief updating after a replication experiment
Conceptualizing and evaluating replication across domains of behavioral research
Constraints on generality statements are needed to define direct replication
Data replication matters to an underpowered study, but replicated hypothesis corroboration counts
Direct replication and clinical psychological science
Direct replications in the era of open sampling
Don't characterize replications as successes or failures
Enhancing research credibility when replication is not feasible
Holding replication studies to mainstream standards of evidence
How to make replications mainstream
If we accept that poor replication rates are mainstream
Introducing a replication-first rule for Ph.D. projects
Making prepublication independent replication mainstream
Making replication prestigious
Putting replication in its place
Replication is already mainstream: Lessons from small-N designs
Replications can cause distorted belief in scientific progress
Scientific progress is like doing a puzzle, not building a wall
Selecting target papers for replication
Strong scientific theorizing is needed to improve replicability in psychological science
The costs and benefits of replication studies
The importance of exact conceptual replications
The meaning of a claim is its reproducibility
The replicability revolution
Three strong moves to improve research and replications alike
Three ways to make replication mainstream
To make innovations such as replication mainstream, publish them in mainstream journals
Verifiability is a core principle of science
Verify original results through reanalysis before replicating
What have we learned? What can we learn?
What the replication reformation wrought
Why replication has more scientific value than original discovery
You are not your data
Author response
Improving social and behavioral science by making replication mainstream: A response to commentaries