Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Kliegl, Oliver
Pastötter, Bernhard
and
Bäuml, Karl-Heinz T.
2020.
Does Amount of Pre-cue Encoding Modulate Selective List Method Directed Forgetting?.
Frontiers in Psychology,
Vol. 11,
Issue. ,
Karaca, Meltem
Kurpad, Nayantara
Wilford, Miko M.
and
Davis, Sara D.
2020.
Too much of a good thing: frequent retrieval can impair immediate new learning.
Memory,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 10,
p.
1181.
Chin, Jason M.
and
Zeiler, Kathryn
2021.
Replicability in Empirical Legal Research.
Annual Review of Law and Social Science,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 1,
p.
239.
Vohs, Kathleen D.
Schmeichel, Brandon J.
Lohmann, Sophie
Gronau, Quentin F.
Finley, Anna J.
Ainsworth, Sarah E.
Alquist, Jessica L.
Baker, Michael D.
Brizi, Ambra
Bunyi, Angelica
Butschek, Grant J.
Campbell, Collier
Capaldi, Jonathan
Cau, Chuting
Chambers, Heather
Chatzisarantis, Nikos L. D.
Christensen, Weston J.
Clay, Samuel L.
Curtis, Jessica
De Cristofaro, Valeria
del Rosario, Kareena
Diel, Katharina
Doğruol, Yasemin
Doi, Megan
Donaldson, Tina L.
Eder, Andreas B.
Ersoff, Mia
Eyink, Julie R.
Falkenstein, Angelica
Fennis, Bob M.
Findley, Matthew B.
Finkel, Eli J.
Forgea, Victoria
Friese, Malte
Fuglestad, Paul
Garcia-Willingham, Natasha E.
Geraedts, Lea F.
Gervais, Will M.
Giacomantonio, Mauro
Gibson, Bryan
Gieseler, Karolin
Gineikiene, Justina
Gloger, Elana M.
Gobes, Carina M.
Grande, Maria
Hagger, Martin S.
Hartsell, Bethany
Hermann, Anthony D.
Hidding, Jasper J.
Hirt, Edward R.
Hodge, Josh
Hofmann, Wilhelm
Howell, Jennifer L.
Hutton, Robert D.
Inzlicht, Michael
James, Lily
Johnson, Emily
Johnson, Hannah L.
Joyce, Sarah M.
Joye, Yannick
Kaben, Jan Helge
Kammrath, Lara K.
Kelly, Caitlin N.
Kissell, Brian L.
Koole, Sander L.
Krishna, Anand
Lam, Christine
Lee, Kelemen T.
Lee, Nick
Leighton, Dana C.
Loschelder, David D.
Maranges, Heather M.
Masicampo, E. J.
Mazara, Kennedy
McCarthy, Samantha
McGregor, Ian
Mead, Nicole L.
Mendes, Wendy B.
Meslot, Carine
Michalak, Nicholas M.
Milyavskaya, Marina
Miyake, Akira
Moeini-Jazani, Mehrad
Muraven, Mark
Nakahara, Erin
Patel, Krishna
Petrocelli, John V.
Pollak, Katja M.
Price, Mindi M.
Ramsey, Haley J.
Rath, Maximilian
Robertson, Jacob A.
Rockwell, Rachael
Russ, Isabella F.
Salvati, Marco
Saunders, Blair
Scherer, Anne
Schütz, Astrid
Schmitt, Kristin N.
Segerstrom, Suzanne C.
Serenka, Benjamin
Sharpinskyi, Konstantyn
Shaw, Meaghan
Sherman, Janelle
Song, Yu
Sosa, Nicholas
Spillane, Kaitlyn
Stapels, Julia
Stinnett, Alec J.
Strawser, Hannah R.
Sweeny, Kate
Theodore, Dominic
Tonnu, Karine
van Oldenbeuving, Yasmijn
vanDellen, Michelle R.
Vergara, Raiza C.
Walker, Jasmine S.
Waugh, Christian E.
Weise, Feline
Werner, Kaitlyn M.
Wheeler, Craig
White, Rachel A.
Wichman, Aaron L.
Wiggins, Bradford J.
Wills, Julian A.
Wilson, Janie H.
Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan
and
Albarracín, Dolores
2021.
A Multisite Preregistered Paradigmatic Test of the Ego-Depletion Effect.
Psychological Science,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 10,
p.
1566.
Youyou, Wu
Yang, Yang
and
Uzzi, Brian
2023.
A discipline-wide investigation of the replicability of Psychology papers over the past two decades.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Vol. 120,
Issue. 6,
Youyou, Wu
Yang, Yang
and
Uzzi, Brian
2023.
Reply to Crockett et al. and Mottelson and Kontogiorgos: Machine learning’s scientific significance and future impact on replicability research.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Vol. 120,
Issue. 33,
Target article
Making replication mainstream
Related commentaries (36)
A Bayesian decision-making framework for replication
A pragmatist philosophy of psychological science and its implications for replication
An argument for how (and why) to incentivise replication
Bayesian belief updating after a replication experiment
Conceptualizing and evaluating replication across domains of behavioral research
Constraints on generality statements are needed to define direct replication
Data replication matters to an underpowered study, but replicated hypothesis corroboration counts
Direct replication and clinical psychological science
Direct replications in the era of open sampling
Don't characterize replications as successes or failures
Enhancing research credibility when replication is not feasible
Holding replication studies to mainstream standards of evidence
How to make replications mainstream
If we accept that poor replication rates are mainstream
Introducing a replication-first rule for Ph.D. projects
Making prepublication independent replication mainstream
Making replication prestigious
Putting replication in its place
Replication is already mainstream: Lessons from small-N designs
Replications can cause distorted belief in scientific progress
Scientific progress is like doing a puzzle, not building a wall
Selecting target papers for replication
Strong scientific theorizing is needed to improve replicability in psychological science
The costs and benefits of replication studies
The importance of exact conceptual replications
The meaning of a claim is its reproducibility
The replicability revolution
Three strong moves to improve research and replications alike
Three ways to make replication mainstream
To make innovations such as replication mainstream, publish them in mainstream journals
Verifiability is a core principle of science
Verify original results through reanalysis before replicating
What have we learned? What can we learn?
What the replication reformation wrought
Why replication has more scientific value than original discovery
You are not your data
Author response
Improving social and behavioral science by making replication mainstream: A response to commentaries