Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Hornikx, Jos
and
van Meurs, Frank
2020.
Foreign Languages in Advertising.
p.
193.
Fabrigar, Leandre R.
Wegener, Duane T.
and
Petty, Richard E.
2020.
A Validity-Based Framework for Understanding Replication in Psychology.
Personality and Social Psychology Review,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 4,
p.
316.
Wilson, Brent M.
Harris, Christine R.
and
Wixted, John T.
2020.
Science is not a signal detection problem.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Vol. 117,
Issue. 11,
p.
5559.
Roettger, Timo B.
2021.
Context sensitivity and failed replications in linguistics – a reply to Grieve.
Linguistics,
Vol. 59,
Issue. 5,
p.
1357.
NAKAMURA, Daiki
HARADA, Yuki
HISASAKA, Tetsuya
UNZAI, Hiroshi
and
MATSUURA, Takuya
2021.
The Reproducibility Crisis in Science Education Studies: Causes and Solutions.
Journal of Research in Science Education,
Vol. 62,
Issue. 1,
p.
3.
Vachon, Brigitte
Curran, Janet A.
Karunananthan, Sathya
Brehaut, Jamie
Graham, Ian D.
Moher, David
Sales, Anne E.
Straus, Sharon E.
Fiander, Michele
Paprica, P. Alison
and
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
2021.
Replication Research Series-Paper 1 : A concept analysis and meta-narrative review established a comprehensive theoretical definition of replication research to improve its use.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,
Vol. 129,
Issue. ,
p.
176.
N. Williams, Matt
and
R. Edwards, Shoni
2021.
Conceptual replication of Seo (2008), “Self-efficacy as a mediator in the relationship between self-oriented perfectionism and academic
procrastination”.
Current Issues in Personality Psychology,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 2,
p.
98.
Zerna, Josephine
Strobel, Alexander
and
Scheffel, Christoph
2021.
EEG microstate analysis of emotion regulation reveals no sequential processing of valence and emotional arousal.
Scientific Reports,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 1,
Roettger, Timo B.
2021.
Preregistration in experimental linguistics: applications, challenges, and limitations.
Linguistics,
Vol. 59,
Issue. 5,
p.
1227.
Beste, Christian
2021.
Disconnected psychology and neuroscience—implications for scientific progress, replicability and the role of publishing.
Communications Biology,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 1,
Anderson, Molly A.B.
and
Dallery, Jesse
2021.
Effects of Amount on Probability Discounting: A Replication and Extension.
Behavioural Processes,
Vol. 190,
Issue. ,
p.
104448.
Vachon, Brigitte
Curran, Janet A.
Karunananthan, Sathya
Brehaut, Jamie
Graham, Ian D.
Moher, David
Sales, Anne E.
Straus, Sharon E.
Fiander, Michele
Paprica, P. Alison
and
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
2021.
Changing research culture toward more use of replication research: a narrative review of barriers and strategies.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,
Vol. 129,
Issue. ,
p.
21.
Krypotos, Angelos-Miltiadis
Mertens, Gaetan
Klugkist, Irene
and
Engelhard, Iris M.
2022.
Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology.
p.
343.
Nosek, Brian A.
Hardwicke, Tom E.
Moshontz, Hannah
Allard, Aurélien
Corker, Katherine S.
Dreber, Anna
Fidler, Fiona
Hilgard, Joe
Kline Struhl, Melissa
Nuijten, Michèle B.
Rohrer, Julia M.
Romero, Felipe
Scheel, Anne M.
Scherer, Laura D.
Schönbrodt, Felix D.
and
Vazire, Simine
2022.
Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science.
Annual Review of Psychology,
Vol. 73,
Issue. 1,
p.
719.
Derksen, Maarten
and
Morawski, Jill
2022.
Kinds of Replication: Examining the Meanings of “Conceptual Replication” and “Direct Replication”.
Perspectives on Psychological Science,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 5,
p.
1490.
Morawski, Jill
2022.
How to True Psychology’s Objects.
Review of General Psychology,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 2,
p.
157.
Matarese, Vera
2022.
Kinds of Replicability: Different Terms and Different Functions.
Axiomathes,
Vol. 32,
Issue. S2,
p.
647.
Colaço, David
Bickle, John
and
Walters, Bradley
2022.
When should researchers cite study differences in response to a failure to replicate?.
Biology & Philosophy,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 5,
Chinman, Matthew
Acosta, Joie
Ebener, Patricia
and
Shearer, Amy
2022.
“What We Have Here, Is a Failure to [Replicate]”: Ways to Solve a Replication Crisis in Implementation Science
.
Prevention Science,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 5,
p.
739.
Edlund, John E.
Cuccolo, Kelly
Irgens, Megan S.
Wagge, Jordan R.
and
Zlokovich, Martha S.
2022.
Saving Science Through Replication Studies.
Perspectives on Psychological Science,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 1,
p.
216.
Target article
Making replication mainstream
Related commentaries (36)
A Bayesian decision-making framework for replication
A pragmatist philosophy of psychological science and its implications for replication
An argument for how (and why) to incentivise replication
Bayesian belief updating after a replication experiment
Conceptualizing and evaluating replication across domains of behavioral research
Constraints on generality statements are needed to define direct replication
Data replication matters to an underpowered study, but replicated hypothesis corroboration counts
Direct replication and clinical psychological science
Direct replications in the era of open sampling
Don't characterize replications as successes or failures
Enhancing research credibility when replication is not feasible
Holding replication studies to mainstream standards of evidence
How to make replications mainstream
If we accept that poor replication rates are mainstream
Introducing a replication-first rule for Ph.D. projects
Making prepublication independent replication mainstream
Making replication prestigious
Putting replication in its place
Replication is already mainstream: Lessons from small-N designs
Replications can cause distorted belief in scientific progress
Scientific progress is like doing a puzzle, not building a wall
Selecting target papers for replication
Strong scientific theorizing is needed to improve replicability in psychological science
The costs and benefits of replication studies
The importance of exact conceptual replications
The meaning of a claim is its reproducibility
The replicability revolution
Three strong moves to improve research and replications alike
Three ways to make replication mainstream
To make innovations such as replication mainstream, publish them in mainstream journals
Verifiability is a core principle of science
Verify original results through reanalysis before replicating
What have we learned? What can we learn?
What the replication reformation wrought
Why replication has more scientific value than original discovery
You are not your data
Author response
Improving social and behavioral science by making replication mainstream: A response to commentaries