No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Hard domains, biased rationalizations, and unanswered empirical questions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 April 2020
Abstract
Cushman raises the intriguing possibility that rationalization accesses/constructs intuitions that are not otherwise cognitively available. However, he substantially over-reaches in arguing that rationalization is mostly right on average, based on claims that the process must have emerged adaptively. The adaptiveness of “bounded rationalization” is domain specific and is unlikely to be adaptive in a large number of important applications.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Footnotes
Authors are listed in the order of “Mom always liked you best.”
Target article
Rationalization is rational
Related commentaries (26)
Antecedent rationalization: Rationalization prior to action
Belief as a non-epistemic adaptive benefit
Cognitive dissonance processes serve an action-oriented adaptive function
Evidence for the rationalisation phenomenon is exaggerated
Ex ante coherence shifts
Hard domains, biased rationalizations, and unanswered empirical questions
Heroes of our own story: Self-image and rationalizing in thought experiments
Ideology, shared moral narratives, and the dark side of collective rationalization
Letting rationalizations out of the box
Means and ends of habitual action
Quantifying the prevalence and adaptiveness of behavioral rationalizations
Rational rationalization and System 2
Rationalization and self-sabotage
Rationalization and the status of folk psychology
Rationalization enables cooperation and cultural evolution
Rationalization in the pejorative sense: Cushman's account overlooks the scope and costs of rationalization
Rationalization is a suboptimal defense mechanism associated with clinical and forensic problems
Rationalization is irrational and self-serving, but useful
Rationalization is rare, reasoning is pervasive
Rationalization may improve predictability rather than accuracy
Rationalization of emotion is also rational
Rationalization: Why, when, and what for?
Rationalizations primarily serve reputation management, not decision making
The rationale of rationalization
The social function of rationalization: An identity perspective
What kind of rationalization is system justification?
Author response
Rationalization as representational exchange: Scope and mechanism