Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:13:33.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cognitive dissonance processes serve an action-oriented adaptive function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

Eddie Harmon-Jones Open the ORCID record for Eddie Harmon-Jones [Opens in a new window]  and
Cindy Harmon-Jones
Eddie Harmon-Jones
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, 2052Australia. [email protected]@gmail.comwww.socialemotiveneuroscience.org
Cindy Harmon-Jones
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, 2052Australia. [email protected]@gmail.comwww.socialemotiveneuroscience.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The action-based model of cognitive dissonance proposes an adaptive function for rationalization that differs from the one offered by Cushman. The one proposed by Cushman is concerned more with the cold construction of cognitions, whereas the one proposed by the action-based model is a motivated protection of a strongly held cognition.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 43 , 2020 , e38
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Egan, L. C., Bloom, P. & Santos, L. R. (2010) Choice-induced preferences in the absence of choice: Evidence from a blind two choice paradigm with young children and capuchin monkeys. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46(1):204–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazio, R. H., Zanna, M. P. & Cooper, J. (1977) Dissonance and self-perception: An integrative view of each theory's proper domain of application. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13:464–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, L. (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Harmon-Jones, C., Schmeichel, B. J., Inzlicht, M. & Harmon-Jones, E. (2011) Trait approach motivation relates to dissonance reduction. Social Psychological and Personality Science 2:21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmon-Jones, E. (2000) Cognitive dissonance and experienced negative affect: Evidence that dissonance increases experienced negative affect even in the absence of aversive consequences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26:1490–1501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmon-Jones, E. (2019) Cognitive dissonance: Re-examining a pivotal theory in psychology (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmon-Jones, E., Amodio, D. M. & Harmon-Jones, C. (2009) Action-based model of dissonance: A review, integration, and expansion of conceptions of cognitive conflict. In: Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 41, ed. Zanna, M. P., pp. 119–66. Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmon-Jones, E., Armstrong, J. & Olson, J. M. (2019) The influence of behavior on attitudes. In: Handbook of attitudes, vol. 1: Basic principles (2nd ed.), ed. Albarracin, D. & Johnson, B. T., pp. 404–49). Routledge.Google Scholar
Harmon-Jones, E., Brehm, J. W., Greenberg, J., Simon, L. & Nelson, D. E. (1996) Evidence that the production of aversive consequences is not necessary to create cognitive dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70:5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmon-Jones, E. & Harmon-Jones, C. (2002) Testing the action-based model of cognitive dissonance: The effect of action-orientation on post-decisional attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28:711–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmon-Jones, E. & Harmon-Jones, C. (2019) Understanding the motivation underlying dissonance effects: The action-based model. In: Cognitive Dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology (2nd ed.), ed. Harmon-Jones, E., pp. 63–89. American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmon-Jones, E., Harmon-Jones, C., Fearn, M., Sigelman, J. D. & Johnson, P. (2008) Left frontal cortical activation and spreading of alternatives: Tests of the action-based model of dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94:1–15. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harmon-Jones, E., Harmon-Jones, C. & Levy, N. (2015a) An action-based model of cognitive dissonance processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science 24:184–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmon-Jones, E., Price, T. F. & Harmon-Jones, C. (2015b) Supine body posture decreases rationalizations: Testing the action-based model of dissonance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 56:228–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zentall, T. R. & Singer, R. A. (2007) Within-trial contrast: Pigeons prefer conditioned reinforcers that follow a relatively more rather than less aversive event. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 88:131–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed