Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:14:30.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A hard choice for Tomasello

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2020

Philip Pettit*
Affiliation:
University Center for Human Values, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ08544. [email protected]://www.princeton.edu/~ppettit School of Philosophy, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia

Abstract

Michael Tomasello explains the human sense of obligation by the role it plays in negotiating practices of acting jointly and the commitments they underwrite. He draws in his work on two models of joint action, one from Michael Bratman, the other from Margaret Gilbert. But Bratman's makes the explanation too difficult to succeed, and Gilbert's makes it too easy.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Axelrod, R. (1984) The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bratman, M. E. (2014) Shared agency: A planning theory of acting together. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, M. (2014) Joint commitment: How we make the social world. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. (2006) Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314:1560–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pettit, P. (2018a) The birth of ethics: Reconstructing the role and nature of morality. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (2018b) Naturalizing Tomasello's history of morality. Philosophical Psychology 31:722–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2016a) A natural history of human morality. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar