Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:30:17.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Who are “we” and why are we cooperating? Insights from social psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2020

Margaret S. Clark ,
Brian D. Earp Open the ORCID record for Brian D. Earp [Opens in a new window]  and
Molly J. Crockett Open the ORCID record for Molly J. Crockett [Opens in a new window]
Margaret S. Clark
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT06520-8306. [email protected]://clarkrelationshiplab.yale.edu/people/[email protected]://oxford.academia.edu/[email protected]://www.crockettlab.org
Brian D. Earp
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT06520-8306. [email protected]://clarkrelationshiplab.yale.edu/people/[email protected]://oxford.academia.edu/[email protected]://www.crockettlab.org
Molly J. Crockett
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT06520-8306. [email protected]://clarkrelationshiplab.yale.edu/people/[email protected]://oxford.academia.edu/[email protected]://www.crockettlab.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tomasello argues in the target article that a sense of moral obligation emerges from the creation of a collaborative “we” motivating us to fulfill our cooperative duties. We suggest that “we” takes many forms, entailing different obligations, depending on the type (and underlying functions) of the relationship(s) in question. We sketch a framework of such types, functions, and obligations to guide future research in our commentary.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 43 , 2020 , e66
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berscheid, E. & Ammazalorso, H. (2001) Emotional experience in close relationships. In: Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes, ed. Fletcher, G. J. O. & Clark, M. S., pp. 308–30. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bloom, P. (2011) Family, community, trolley problems, and the crisis in moral psychology. The Yale Review 99(2):26–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugental, D. B. (2000) Acquisition of the algorithms of social life: A domain-based approach. Psychological Bulletin 126(2):187–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, M. S. (1984) Record keeping in two types of relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47(3):549–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, M. S. & Boothby, E. (2013) A strange(r) analysis of morality: a consideration of relational context and the broader literature is needed. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 36(1):85–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, M. S., Dubash, P. & Mills, J. (1998) Interest in another's consideration of one's needs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 34(3):246–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, M. S., Lemay, E. P. & Reis, H. T. (2017) Other people as situations: Relational context shapes psychological phenomena. In: Oxford handbook of situations, ed. Funder, D. & Sherman, R., pp. 1–40. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, M. S. & Mills, J. (1979) Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37(1):12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, M. S. & Mills, J. (2012) A theory of communal (and exchange) relationships. In: Handbook of theories of social psychology, vol. 2, ed. Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W. & Higgins, E. T., pp. 232–50. SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, M. S., Mills, J. & Corcoran, D. (1989) Keeping track of needs and inputs of friends and strangers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 15(4):533–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, M. S., Ouellette, R., Powell, M. C. & Milberg, S. (1987) Recipient's mood, relationship type, and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53(1):94–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiske, A. P. (1992) The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review 99(4):689–723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haidt, J. & Baron, J. (1996) Social roles and the moral judgement of acts and omissions. European Journal of Social Psychology 26(2):201–18.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, H. H. (1982) Personal relationships: Their structures and processes. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H., Holmes, J. G., Kerr, N. L., Reis, H. T., Rusbult, C. E. & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003) An atlas of interpersonal situations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lemay, E. P., Overall, N. C. & Clark, M. S. (2010) Experiences and interpersonal consequences of hurt and anger. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 103(6):982–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, A. P. & Tetlock, P. E. (2005) Taboo trade-offs, relational framing, and the acceptability of exchanges. Journal of Consumer Psychology 15(1):2–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rai, S. T. & Fiske, A. P. (2011) Moral psychology is relationship regulation: Moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review 118(1):57–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reis, H. T. (2008) Reinvigorating the concept of situation in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review 12(4):311–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simpson, A. & Laham, S. M. (2015, February) Individual differences in relational construal are associated with variability in moral judgment. Personality and Individual Differences 74:49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, A., Laham, S. M. & Fiske, A. P. (2016) Wrongness in different relationships: Relational context effects on moral judgment. The Journal of Social Psychology 156(6):594–609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tepe, B. & Adymi-Karakulak, A. (2018) Beyond harmfulness and impurity: Moral wrongness as a violation of relational motivations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 117(2):310–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walster, E., Walster, G. W. & Berscheid, E. (1978) Equity: Theory and research. Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar