Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-rj9fg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-21T23:06:21.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The social identity approach offers a more parsimonious and complete explanation of historical myths’ function and characteristics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2025

Peter Kardos Open the ORCID record for Peter Kardos [Opens in a new window]
Peter Kardos*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Kean University, Hillside, NJ, USA [email protected]
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The social identity approach offers a more parsimonious and more comprehensive explanation for historical myths’ assumed coalition-building function than the target article's proposed mechanism based on fitness interdependence. Target article's assertion that social identity theory cannot explain certain characteristics of historical myths is based on a narrow interpretation of the social identity approach.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 47 , 2024 , e182
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baron, J., Ritov, I., & Greene, J. D. (2013). The duty to support nationalistic policies. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(2), 128–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35–58). Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellemers, N. (2001). Social identity, commitment, and work behavior. In: Hogg, M.A., & Terry, D.J. (Eds.). Social identity processes in organizational contexts (pp. 101–114). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Haslam, S. A., Oakes, P. J., Reynolds, K. J., & Turner, J. C. (1999). Social identity salience and the emergence of stereotype consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 809–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., Postmes, T., Spears, R., Jetten, J., & Webley, P. (2006). Sticking to our guns: Social identity as a basis for the maintenance of commitment to faltering organizational projects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 607–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jetten, J., & Wohl, M. J. (2012). The past as a determinant of the present: Historical continuity, collective angst, and opposition to immigration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(4), 442–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sani, F., Bowe, M., & Herrera, M. (2008). Perceived collective continuity and social well-being: Exploring the connections. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(2), 365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sani, F., Bowe, M., Herrera, M., Manna, C., Cossa, T., Miao, X., & Zhou, Y. (2007). Perceived collective continuity: Seeing groups as entities that move through time. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1118–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smeekes, A., & Verkuyten, M. (2013). Collective self-continuity, group identification and in-group defense. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(6), 984–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In Tajfel, H. (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1989). Self-categorization theory and social influence. In Paulus, P. B. (Ed.), The psychology of group influence (Vol. 2, pp. 233–275). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Blackwell.Google Scholar
van Knippenberg, D., & Ellemers, N. (2003). Social identity and group performance: Identification as the key to collective effort. In Haslam, S. A., van Knippenberg, D., Platow, M. J., & Ellemers, N. (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 29–42). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Vignoles, V. L. (2011). Identity motives. In Luyckx, K., Schwartz, S. J., & Vignoles, V. L. (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 403–432). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar