No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Historical myths promote cooperation through affective states
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2025
Abstract
Although we agree that historical myths function to increase cooperation in the groups that share them, we propose that the mechanisms at work may include affective states. We suggest that sharing historical myths can create a felt sense of intimacy, similarity, and security among group members, which increases trust and motivates cooperation, even without particular beliefs about population structure.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Eisenbruch, A. B., Grillot, R. L., Maestripieri, D., & Roney, J. R. (2016). Evidence of partner choice heuristics in a one-shot bargaining game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37, 429–439. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.04.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theriault, J. E., Young, L., & Feldman Barrett, L. (2021). The sense of should: A biologically-based framework for modeling social pressure. Physics of Life Reviews, 36, 100–136. doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2020.01.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiessner, P. (2014). Embers of society: Firelight talk among the Ju/’hoansi Bushmen. PNAS, 111(39), 14027–14035. doi:10.1073/pnas.1404212111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Target article
“Our roots run deep”: Historical myths as culturally evolved technologies for coalitional recruitment
Related commentaries (25)
A terror management theory perspective on the appeal of historical myths
Adaptive lags, illusions and common interest
Beyond our “ancient roots”: Toward a broader understanding of the motivational power of societal meta-narratives
Collective selfhood as a psychically necessary illusion
Group myths can create shared understanding even if they don't act as superstimuli
Historical myths are believed because audiences are socially motivated
Historical myths as commitment devices
Historical myths define group boundaries: A mathematical sketch and evidence from Ukraine
Historical myths promote cooperation through affective states
Homo historicus: History as psychological science
Limited evidence that fitness interdependence produces historical origin myths
Myth as model: Group-level interpretive frameworks
Mythos in the light of evolution
Myths and fitness interdependence: Beyond coalitional longevity
Myths and prestige in Hindu nationalist politics
Myths of trauma and myths of cooperation: Diverse consequences of history for societal cohesion
Past glories feel good but creative minorities push us forward
The influence of stories including myths of origin
The social cognitive evolution of myths: Collective narratives of shared pasts as markers for coalitions' communicative and cooperative prowess
The social identity approach offers a more parsimonious and complete explanation of historical myths’ function and characteristics
The Trojan horse of historical myths: Emotion-driven narratives as a strategy for coalitional recruitment
Uncertainty reduction as an alternative explanation of historical myths
What about language?
Why some coalitions benefit from historical myths more than others
“We are one people”: Group myths also draw cues from self-concept formation
Author response
Coalitional psychology and the evolution of nationalistic cultures