No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
“We are one people”: Group myths also draw cues from self-concept formation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2025
Abstract
Sijilmassi et al. suggest that group myths explaining the shared history of a people succeed and propagate by leveraging cognitive cues from fitness interdependence. We offer an alternative and mutually compatible account rooting the success of group myths in cues from a different cognitive domain: The development of self-concepts.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Bluck, S., & Alea, N. (2008). Remembering being me: The self-continuity function of autobiographical memory in younger and older adults. In Sani, F. (Ed.), Self-continuity: Individual and collective perspectives (pp. 55–70). Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. D. (1990). Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 538–549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, J. D., Assanand, S., & Di Paula, A. (2003). The structure of the self-concept and its relation to psychological adjustment. Journal of Personality, 71, 115–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, J. D., & Lavallee, L. E. (1993). Who am I? The role of self-concept confusion in understanding the behavior of people with low self-esteem. In Baumeister, R. E. (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard (pp. 3–20). Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, T., & Köber, C. (2014). Autobiographical reasoning is constitutive for narrative identity: The role of the life story for personal continuity. In Mclean, K. C. & Syed, M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of identity development (pp. 149–165). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, T., & Köber, C. (2015). Autobiographical reasoning in life narratives buffers the effect of biographical disruptions on the sense of self-continuity. Memory, 23, 664–674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hastie, R. (2022). Schematic principles in human memory. In Higgins, E. T., Herman, C. P., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), Social cognition (1st ed., pp. 39–88). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogendoorn, H. (2022). Perception in real-time: Predicting the present, reconstructing the past. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(2), 128–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jhangiani, R., & Tarry, H. (2022, January 26). Principles of social psychology – 1st international H5P edition. Pressbooks. https://opentextbc.ca/socialpsychology/Google Scholar
Jiang, T., Chen, Z., & Sedikides, C. (2020). Self-concept clarity lays the foundation for self-continuity: The restorative function of autobiographical memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(4), 945–959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loftus, E., & Palmer, J. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction. An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(5), 585–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Target article
“Our roots run deep”: Historical myths as culturally evolved technologies for coalitional recruitment
Related commentaries (25)
A terror management theory perspective on the appeal of historical myths
Adaptive lags, illusions and common interest
Beyond our “ancient roots”: Toward a broader understanding of the motivational power of societal meta-narratives
Collective selfhood as a psychically necessary illusion
Group myths can create shared understanding even if they don't act as superstimuli
Historical myths are believed because audiences are socially motivated
Historical myths as commitment devices
Historical myths define group boundaries: A mathematical sketch and evidence from Ukraine
Historical myths promote cooperation through affective states
Homo historicus: History as psychological science
Limited evidence that fitness interdependence produces historical origin myths
Myth as model: Group-level interpretive frameworks
Mythos in the light of evolution
Myths and fitness interdependence: Beyond coalitional longevity
Myths and prestige in Hindu nationalist politics
Myths of trauma and myths of cooperation: Diverse consequences of history for societal cohesion
Past glories feel good but creative minorities push us forward
The influence of stories including myths of origin
The social cognitive evolution of myths: Collective narratives of shared pasts as markers for coalitions' communicative and cooperative prowess
The social identity approach offers a more parsimonious and complete explanation of historical myths’ function and characteristics
The Trojan horse of historical myths: Emotion-driven narratives as a strategy for coalitional recruitment
Uncertainty reduction as an alternative explanation of historical myths
What about language?
Why some coalitions benefit from historical myths more than others
“We are one people”: Group myths also draw cues from self-concept formation
Author response
Coalitional psychology and the evolution of nationalistic cultures