No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Uncertainty reduction as an alternative explanation of historical myths
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2025
Abstract
We agree with Sijilmassi et al. that historical myths are a tool for coalition recruitment. We argue, however, that a close fit between an evolved entity and an identified function does not imply that the latter is the critical evolutionary trigger. We also propose an alternative individual-centric explanation: Historical myths reduce uncertainty by providing cognitive and behavioral guidance.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Barber, N. (2011). A cross-national test of the uncertainty hypothesis of religious belief. Cross-Cultural Research, 45(3), 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397111402465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burling, R. (1986). The selective advantage of complex language. Ethology and Sociobiology, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(86)90011-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gračanin, A., Bylsma, L. M., & Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M. (2017). The communicative and social functions of human crying. In Fernández-Dols, J.-M. & Russell, J. A. (Eds.), The science of facial expression (pp. 217–233). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grüning, D. J., & Krueger, J. I. (2023). Indeterminism belief protects against uncertainty: First empirical findings. Discover Psychology, 3, 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-023-00086-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, J. I., & Grüning, D. J. (2021). Psychological perversities and populism. In Forgas, J. P., Crano, W. D., & Fiedler, K. (Eds.), The psychology of populism (pp. 125–142). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, J. I., & Grüning, D. J. (2023). Strategy, trust, and freedom in an uncertain world. In Forgas, J. P., Crano, W. D., & Fiedler, K. (Eds.), The psychology of insecurity (pp. 150–169). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, J. I., & Grüning, D. J. (2024). Dostoevsky at play: Between risk and uncertainty in Roulettenburg. In Edokimova, S. (Ed.), Dostoevsky's the gambler: The allure of the wheel (pp. 59–86). Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Smith, B. D. (2015). A comparison of niche construction theory and diet breadth models as explanatory frameworks for the initial domestication of plants and animals. Journal of Archaeological Research, 23, 215–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10814-015-9081-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vingerhoets, A. J., & Bylsma, L. M. (2016). The riddle of human emotional crying: A challenge for emotion researchers. Emotion Review, 8(3), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915586226CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M., Ven, N., & Velden, Y. (2016). The social impact of emotional tears. Motivation and Emotion, 40(3), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9543-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, R., & Hamilton, M. (2011). Social complexity and linguistic diversity in the Austronesian and Bantu population expansions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1710), 1399–1404. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1942CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zickfeld, J., & Grüning, D. J. (2021). A meta-analysis on the autonomic nervous system correlates of human emotional crying. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/axjd5Google Scholar
Target article
“Our roots run deep”: Historical myths as culturally evolved technologies for coalitional recruitment
Related commentaries (25)
A terror management theory perspective on the appeal of historical myths
Adaptive lags, illusions and common interest
Beyond our “ancient roots”: Toward a broader understanding of the motivational power of societal meta-narratives
Collective selfhood as a psychically necessary illusion
Group myths can create shared understanding even if they don't act as superstimuli
Historical myths are believed because audiences are socially motivated
Historical myths as commitment devices
Historical myths define group boundaries: A mathematical sketch and evidence from Ukraine
Historical myths promote cooperation through affective states
Homo historicus: History as psychological science
Limited evidence that fitness interdependence produces historical origin myths
Myth as model: Group-level interpretive frameworks
Mythos in the light of evolution
Myths and fitness interdependence: Beyond coalitional longevity
Myths and prestige in Hindu nationalist politics
Myths of trauma and myths of cooperation: Diverse consequences of history for societal cohesion
Past glories feel good but creative minorities push us forward
The influence of stories including myths of origin
The social cognitive evolution of myths: Collective narratives of shared pasts as markers for coalitions' communicative and cooperative prowess
The social identity approach offers a more parsimonious and complete explanation of historical myths’ function and characteristics
The Trojan horse of historical myths: Emotion-driven narratives as a strategy for coalitional recruitment
Uncertainty reduction as an alternative explanation of historical myths
What about language?
Why some coalitions benefit from historical myths more than others
“We are one people”: Group myths also draw cues from self-concept formation
Author response
Coalitional psychology and the evolution of nationalistic cultures