No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Myth as model: Group-level interpretive frameworks
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2025
Abstract
I argue that while recruitment might explain some of the design features of historical myths, origin myths in general more importantly provide shared narrative frameworks for aligning and coordinating members of a group. Furthermore, by providing in-group members with shared frameworks for interfacing with the world, the contents of myths likely facilitate the selection of belief systems at the group-level.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Brand, C. O., Mesoudi, A., & Smaldino, P. E. (2021) Analogy as a catalyst for cumulative cultural evolution. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(6), 450–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubourg, E., & Baumard, N. (2022) Why and how did narrative fictions evolve? Fictions as entertainment technologies. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 786770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottschall, J. (2012). The storytelling animal: How stories make us human. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1983, June 28). Evolution and spontaneous order [Speech audio recording]. Lindau Nobel Laureate Meetings. Retrieved from https://mediatheque.lindau-nobel.org/recordings/31497/evolution-and-spontaneous-order-1983Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Miton, H., & DeDeo, S. (2022) The cultural transmission of tacit knowledge. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 19(195), 20220238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polanyi, M. (1952) The stability of beliefs. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 3(11), 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Smaldino, P. E. (2014). The cultural evolution of emergent group-level traits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(3), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13001544CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward-Perkins, B. (2005). The fall of Rome and the end of civilization. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Target article
“Our roots run deep”: Historical myths as culturally evolved technologies for coalitional recruitment
Related commentaries (25)
A terror management theory perspective on the appeal of historical myths
Adaptive lags, illusions and common interest
Beyond our “ancient roots”: Toward a broader understanding of the motivational power of societal meta-narratives
Collective selfhood as a psychically necessary illusion
Group myths can create shared understanding even if they don't act as superstimuli
Historical myths are believed because audiences are socially motivated
Historical myths as commitment devices
Historical myths define group boundaries: A mathematical sketch and evidence from Ukraine
Historical myths promote cooperation through affective states
Homo historicus: History as psychological science
Limited evidence that fitness interdependence produces historical origin myths
Myth as model: Group-level interpretive frameworks
Mythos in the light of evolution
Myths and fitness interdependence: Beyond coalitional longevity
Myths and prestige in Hindu nationalist politics
Myths of trauma and myths of cooperation: Diverse consequences of history for societal cohesion
Past glories feel good but creative minorities push us forward
The influence of stories including myths of origin
The social cognitive evolution of myths: Collective narratives of shared pasts as markers for coalitions' communicative and cooperative prowess
The social identity approach offers a more parsimonious and complete explanation of historical myths’ function and characteristics
The Trojan horse of historical myths: Emotion-driven narratives as a strategy for coalitional recruitment
Uncertainty reduction as an alternative explanation of historical myths
What about language?
Why some coalitions benefit from historical myths more than others
“We are one people”: Group myths also draw cues from self-concept formation
Author response
Coalitional psychology and the evolution of nationalistic cultures