Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2019
The network approach as a novel way of understanding psychopathology has helped address some of the existing issues associated with traditional biological interpretations. Nonetheless, it has similarly failed in explaining the fundamental etiology of mental conditions – a persistent conundrum that arguably could be adequately addressed only by evolutionary formulations, specifically evolutionary mismatch and life history theories.
Please note a has been issued for this article.
Target article
Brain disorders? Not really: Why network structures block reductionism in psychopathology research
Related commentaries (29)
Beyond reduction with the representation: The need for causality with full complexity to unravel mental health
Beyond trait reductionism: Implications of network structures for dimensional models of psychopathology
Brain networks for emotion and cognition: Implications and tools for understanding mental disorders and pathophysiology
Brain networks require a network-conscious psychopathological approach
Conceptualizing neurodevelopmental disorders as networks: Promises and challenges
Elimination, not reduction: Lessons from the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) and multiple realisation
Evolutionary-developmental modeling of neurodiversity and psychopathology
Families of network structures – we need both phenomenal and explanatory models
Functional disorders can also be explained through a non-reductionist application of network theory
Getting to the bottom of things: The value of evolutionary approaches in discerning the origin of psychopathology
Indeed, not really a brain disorder: Implications for reductionist accounts of addiction
Intentional content in psychopathologies requires an expanded interpretivism
Making a case for constructive reductionism
Neither biological nor symptomatology reductionism: A call for integration in psychopathology research
Network models can help focus research on the role of culture and context in psychopathology, but don't discount latent variable models
Networks, intentionality and multiple realizability: Not enough to block reductionism
Problem behavior in autism spectrum disorders: A paradigmatic self-organized perspective of network structures
Reductionism – simplified and scientific
Reductionist thinking and animal models in neuropsychiatric research
Special, radical, failure of reduction in psychiatry
Symptoms are not the solution but the problem: Why psychiatric research should focus on processes rather than symptoms
Taking an engineer's view: Implications of network analysis for computational psychiatry
The adaptive self: Culture and social flexibility in feedback networks
The biology of mental disorders: What are we talking about?
The network takeover reaches psychopathology
The value of clinical and translational neuroscience approaches to psychiatric illness
Therapy and prevention for mental health: What if mental diseases are mostly not brain disorders?
What's in a model? Network models as tools instead of representations of what psychiatric disorders really are
Why not be pluralists about explanatory reduction?
Author response
Reductionism in retreat