Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T12:35:55.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The adaptive self: Culture and social flexibility in feedback networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Daina Crafa  and
Saskia K. Nagel
Daina Crafa
Affiliation:
Integrated Program in Neuroscience, Douglas Mental Health Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, H4H 1R3, [email protected]://www.dainacrafa.com
Saskia K. Nagel
Affiliation:
Human Technology Center, RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, [email protected] Department of Philosophy, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Culture contextualizes the contents and intentionality of many mental statuses. Cognitive mediation of cultural information shapes these contents and intentionalities, as well as many of the false beliefs of pathology. Flexibility of cognitive mediation processes and resulting beliefs and pathologies may vary by individual, be a key mechanism of the feedback loop, and help characterize network connections.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 42 , 2019 , e5
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambadyp, N. & Bharucha, J. (2009) Culture and the brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science 18:342–45.Google Scholar
Archpru Akaka, M. & Chandler, J. D. (2011) Roles as resources: A social roles perspective of change in value networks. Marketing Theory 11(3):243–60.Google Scholar
Bliksted, V., Fagerlund, B., Weed, E., Frith, C. & Videbech, P. (2014) Social cognition and neurocognitive deficits in first-episode schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 153:9–17.Google Scholar
Borsboom, D. (2008) Psychometric perspectives on diagnostic systems. Journal of Clinical Psychology 9:1089–1108.Google Scholar
Bowie, C. R., Leung, W. W., Reichenberg, A., McClure, M. M., Patterson, T. L., Heaton, R. K. & Harvey, P. D. (2008) Predicting schizophrenia patients’ real-world behavior with specific neuropsychological and functional capacity measures. Biological Psychiatry 63:505–11.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, S. R. & Menzies, L. (2009) Endophenotypes of obsessive–compulsive disorder: Rationale, evidence and future potential. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 9:1133–46.Google Scholar
Crafa, D. & Nagel, S. (2013) Accounting for heterogeneity: The culture-brain-behavior interaction model. Poster presented at the Meeting of the International Cultural Neuroscience Consortium, Evanston, Illinois, June 2013.Google Scholar
Crafa, D. & Nagel, S. K. (in press) Traces of culture: The feedback loop between brain, behavior, and disorder. Transcultural Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T. & Rockström, J. (2010) Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society 15(4): article 20. Online publication. Available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/.Google Scholar
Geurts, H. M., Corbett, B. & Solomon, M. (2009) The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism. Trends in Cognitive Science 13:74–82.Google Scholar
Kemmelmeier, M. & Kühnen, U. (2012) Culture as process: The dynamics of cultural stability and change. Social Psychology 43:171–73.Google Scholar
Kitayama, S. & Uskul, A. K. (2011) Culture, mind, and the brain: Current evidence and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology 62:419–49.Google Scholar
Luhrmann, T. M., Padmavati, R., Tharoor, H. & Osei, A. (2014) Differences in voice-hearing experiences of people with psychosis in the USA, India and Ghana: Interview-based study. British Journal of Psychiatry 206:41–44.Google Scholar
Menon, V. & Uddin, L. Q. (2010) Saliency, switching, attention and control: A network model of insula function. Brain Structure and Function 214:655–67.Google Scholar
Ramos-Sánchez, L. & Atkinson, D. R. (2009) The relationships between Mexican American acculturation, cultural values, gender, and help-seeking intentions. Journal of Counseling and Development 87:62–71.Google Scholar
Varela, F. J. & Shear, J. (1999) First-person methodologies: What, why, how. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6:1–14.Google Scholar