Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T13:34:59.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A developmental science commentary on Charney's “Behavior genetics and postgenomics”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2012

George F. Michel
George F. Michel*
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 27402. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Charney's target article convincingly demonstrates the need for the discipline of quantitative human behavior genetics to discard its false assumptions and to employ the techniques, assumptions, and research program characteristic of modern developmental psychobiology.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , October 2012 , pp. 371 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fisher, R. A. (1925) Statistical methods for research workers. Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1869/1891) Hereditary genius. D. Appleton.Google Scholar
Gottesman, H. & Gould, T. D. (2003) The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: Etymology and strategic intention. American Journal of Psychiatry 160(4):636–45.Google Scholar
Maheu, L. & Macdonald, R. A. (2011) The changing boundaries of genes and social environment in perspective: An overview. In: Challenging genetic determinism: New perspectives on the gene in its multiple environments, ed. Maheu, L. & Macdonald, R. A. pp. 3–48. McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Michel, G. F. & Moore, C. L. (1995) Developmental psychobiology: An interdisciplinary science. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar