We describe the case of a child presenting with what initially appeared as a pervasive developmental disorder (ICD F84.1) associated with, and in our view, induced by, schizophrenic illness in the mother. Important issues are raised for both adult and child psychiatry, in particular that the failure of the Mental Health Act (1983) to address the mother's needs adequately, left the child vulnerable to her untreated illness.

Email is a major means of communication in healthcare and it facilitates the fast delivery of messages and information. But email's ubiquity has brought challenges. It has changed the way we get things done, and working days can be dictated by the receipt and reply of multiple email messages, which drown out other priorities. This article examines email's advantages and disadvantages and, with a focus on healthcare professionals, examines what individuals and organisations can do to ensure email works for us, rather than – as can seem the case – the other way around.

Since 2018, the International Task Force on Benzodiazepines (ITFB), a group of academic psychiatrists and academic psychologists, has advocated that clinical guidelines should change to promote benzodiazepines from second- to first-line treatment for anxiety disorders, accept their use as maintenance treatment for anxiety conditions (in particular, panic disorder) and increase their use in gastrointestinal disorders. There is merit in much of what the ITFB argues, but in this article I analyse four major claims it has made in opinion editorials that I believe are not fully supported by the available evidence.

This article critically reviews the case law, guidance and standards related to the provision of expert psychiatric evidence in immigration and asylum cases in the UK. It discusses the potentially complex and medico-legally challenging process of psychiatric evaluation of asylum seekers, and the implications of the presence of psychiatric disorders for issues such as the individual's ability to give oral evidence in court, immigration detention, fitness to fly, removal, deportation, ability to reintegrate into the destination country and appeal rights. To give context to the discussion, it outlines the asylum process in the UK from claiming asylum, initial screening and the ‘substantive interview’ to, if a claim is rejected, appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber), detention and the removal process.

At a time when patients are challenged to cope adaptively with both the diagnosis and treatment of cancer, clinicians need to respond appropriately to the many inevitable questions about the causes of cancer and contributing factors, including ‘Is this my fault?’. The evidence guiding answers to such questions has been confounded by many methodological challenges, but personality, stress and life events are no longer considered causes of cancer. However, social isolation, untreated depression and social deprivation continue to influence quality of life and reduce cancer survival times. Psychiatry might play a role in promoting lifestyle changes that reduce the risk of cancer, but more importantly it can influence disease progression by optimising patients' adaptation to the many challenges that cancer brings.

‘Drug-centred’ prescribing in psychiatry has been proposed as a new and better approach than the current ‘disease-centred’ alternative. It targets symptoms most important to the patient using the concept that psychotropics act indirectly by altering normal functioning. I contend that it is a straw man: psychiatrists already use ‘drug-centred’ prescribing, applying their knowledge of a drug's pharmacological profile and evidence base to treat each patient's symptoms, not their diagnostic classification. Furthermore, there is no compelling evidence that psychotropics act by altering ‘normal’ functioning: rather, they have diverse effects on different mental states.

Psychosis is a complex presentation with a wide range of factors contributing to its development, biological and environmental. Psychosis is a feature present in a variety of psychiatric disorders. It is important for clinicians to keep up to date with evidence regarding current understanding of the reasons psychosis may occur. Furthermore, it is necessary to find clinical utility from this knowledge so that effective primary, secondary and tertiary preventative strategies can be considered. This article is the first of a three-part series that examines contemporary knowledge of risk factors for psychosis and presents an overview of current explanations. The articles focus on the psychosis risk timeline, which gives a structure within which to consider key aspects of risk likely to affect people at different stages of life. In this first article, early life is discussed. It covers elements that contribute in the prenatal and early childhood period and includes genetic, nutritional and infective risk factors.

This article discusses sceptical arguments about measurement scales. Measurement scales are part of a promising agenda of openness, transparency and patient and public involvement (PPI) in medical research, but have received critical, sometimes hostile attention from anthropologists. This is because scales repackage localised cultural assumptions about distress as something universal and pan-human and have the capacity to reshape people's interior lives in unhelpful, possibly harmful ways. We take as an example the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Use of the PHQ-9 is currently mandated by major funders. But its history suggests flawed PPI and a lack of openness. The article suggests a constructive role for anthropology in mental health research, using ethnographic evidence and theory to show how, although they have their uses, mental health scales should not be regarded as inert or harmless.

The book Psychotherapy by Reciprocal Inhibition (1968) is widely acclaimed as the masterwork of Joseph Wolpe, a great pioneer in the development of behavioural therapy, and is considered one of the most influential books in the history of clinical psychology. In this article, a brief biography of Wolpe is followed by a critical review of the book that illustrates his major contributions to the evolution of cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) as the most empirically supported model of psychotherapy.

Motivational interviewing is a form of psychotherapy in which ambivalence towards an aberrant behaviour is targeted. Rather than challenge the behaviour directly, the clinician encourages the patient to devise a list of problems that are caused by the behaviour and to identify solutions. There are many trials of motivational interviewing, although it has been most studied as treatment for substance misuse. The effect sizes for motivational interviewing are small, they probably diminish over time, the trials often use multiple outcome measures and the outcomes of some very large trials have been disappointing. Large effects are occasionally reported, although these tend to be from small trials conducted by highly motivated research groups and the results tend to diminish when the trials are repeated or enlarged. Nonetheless, motivational interviewing is a well-validated approach supporting and enabling engagement in therapeutic process. It could be argued that even though it might not be as efficacious as a primary/stand-alone means of changing patients’ behaviour, it can still be highly effective when combined with other approaches or used as a conduit to a more intensive therapy.

Formal communication skills training is the norm at UK medical schools, and evidence is mounting that it is effective in a number of domains, including patient satisfaction and shared decision-making, leading to improved treatment adherence. However, applying these models in mental health settings is challenging, despite the fact that positive therapeutic relationships and an ability to actively manage consultations are the cornerstone of psychiatric practice. Communication skills training is still too often regarded as better suited to physical health consultations than more complex psychiatric interviews. Here, it is considered why this might be, with reference to the one eligible randomised controlled trial identified in this systematic literature review.

The media offers opportunities for psychiatrists to communicate with a wide and varied audience, thereby influencing the views of the public and policy makers on mental health issues. There are many different types of media outlet, including daily news media, documentary makers, specialist media, features and comment, and new media. The Science Media Centre is an independent press office that aims to help ensure that the views of scientists, clinicians and researchers are heard in the UK national news media when their area of expertise hits the headlines. In the news media, journalists work to tight time frames and often focus on sensational and controversial topics, presenting challenges for those wanting to engage. For experts to work effectively with the news media it helps to understand more about the way the media works and how to develop necessary skills. Psychiatrists who do work successfully with the media can help ensure that the public receive accurate information about mental health problems, and gain an appreciation of the importance of research in the field and a better understanding of the role of the psychiatrist.

This article examines how madness is depicted in the work of Dostoyevsky. It gives a brief account of Dostoyevsky's life before looking at the many ways in which he portrayed insanity. It suggests that he provided a sophisticated and complex picture of mental illness which has relevance for how contemporary clinicians conceive of psychiatric illness.

Self-determination theory has been offered as a potential theoretical framework for recovery. It has been argued that a concept as wide-ranging as recovery seems likely to require a number of theoretical frameworks, including self-determination theory, which appears to be particularly applicable to the clinical and social dimensions of this concept. With its emphasis on social competence and environmental support, self-determination theory may be particularly useful as a framework for considering recovery in client groups with higher levels of service need associated with disability or risk.

Anthony Winston reviews and describes current perspectives on the aetiology of borderline personality disorder, covering areas such as the role of traumatic factors, attachment theory and self-psychology. The author links these to the psychopathology of the borderline patient who experiences difficulties such as regulation of affect, impulse control and cognitive capacity to both think and reflect. The psychological function of splitting is considered along with other defence mechanisms as having adaptive potential for the borderline patient. Winston describes in a helpful way the links between human development, psychodynamics and psychopathology as he reveals some of the more recent contributions to the field of BPD. At the beginning of his article, he emphasises the problems encountered when attempting to treat or manage patients with BPD. He centres these difficulties on the counter-transference of the clinician, pointing out how such feelings can “all too easily be transformed into therapeutic nihilism”. His article can easily be read as an attempt to counter such a state of mind and he appears to try to generate a more hopeful if not optimistic outlook. In doing so, I fear that he goes beyond his own account of the research evidence for the effectiveness of treatment. Such enthusiasm or optimism can readily be understood as a reactive polar opposite to nihilism or pessimism. I would like to consider further Winston's statements germane to this aspect of his article and raise for further discussion some other ideas which extend beyond the narrower confines of aetiology and psychological therapy.