Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:31:04.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What's in a model? Network models as tools instead of representations of what psychiatric disorders really are

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Hanna M. van Loo  and
Jan-Willem Romeijn
Hanna M. van Loo
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands. [email protected]://www.rug.nl/staff/h.m.van.loo/
Jan-Willem Romeijn
Affiliation:
Faculty of Philosophy, University of Groningen, 9712 GL Groningen, The Netherlands. [email protected]://www.philos.rug.nl/~romeyn/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Network models block reductionism about psychiatric disorders only if models are interpreted in a realist manner – that is, taken to represent “what psychiatric disorders really are.” A flexible and more instrumentalist view of models is needed to improve our understanding of the heterogeneity and multifactorial character of psychiatric disorders.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 42 , 2019 , e30
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bringmann, L. F. & Eronen, M. I. (2018) Don't blame the model: Reconsidering the network approach to psychopathology. Psychological Review 125(4):606–15. doi: 10.1037/rev0000108.Google Scholar
Dalmau, J., Tüzün, E., Wu, H., Masjuan, J., Rossi, J. E., Voloschin, A., Baehring, J. M., Shimazaki, H., Koide, R., King, D., Mason, W., Sansing, L. H., Dichter, M. A., Rosenfeld, M. R. & Lynch, D. R. (2007) Paraneoplastic anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis associated with ovarian teratoma. Annals of Neurology 61(1):25–36. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.21050.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (2014) The structure of psychiatric science. The American Journal of Psychiatry 171(9):931–38. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.13111539.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. S. & Morrison, M., eds. (1999) Models as mediators. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660108.Google Scholar
Van Loo, H. M., De Jonge, P., Romeijn, J.-W., Kessler, R. C. & Schoevers, R. A. (2012) Data-driven subtypes of major depressive disorder: A systematic review. BMC Medicine 10(1):156. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-156.Google Scholar
Van Loo, H. M. & Romeijn, J.-W. (2015) Psychiatric comorbidity: Fact or artifact? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 36(1):41–60.Google Scholar
Wichers, M., Wigman, J. T. W., Bringmann, L. F. & de Jonge, P. (2017) Mental disorders as networks: Some cautionary reflections on a promising approach. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 52(2):143–45. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-016-1335-z.Google Scholar