Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:26:36.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Talking to each other and talking together: Joint language tasks and degrees of interactivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2013

Chiara Gambi  and
Martin J. Pickering
Chiara Gambi
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, Scotland, United Kingdom. [email protected]@ed.ac.ukhttp://www.psy.ed.ac.uk/people/martinp/index_html
Martin J. Pickering
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, Scotland, United Kingdom. [email protected]@ed.ac.ukhttp://www.psy.ed.ac.uk/people/martinp/index_html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A second-person perspective in neuroscience is particularly appropriate for the study of communication. We describe how the investigation of joint language tasks can contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms underlying interaction.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , August 2013 , pp. 423 - 424
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bavelas, J. B., Coates, L. & Johnson, T. (2000) Listeners as co-narrators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79:941–52.Google Scholar
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J. & Cleland, A. A. (2000) Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition 75:B13–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, H. H. (1996) Using language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986) Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition 22:1–39.Google Scholar
Gambi, C. & Pickering, M. J. (2011) A cognitive architecture for the coordination of utterances. Frontiers in Psychology 2:275. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00275.Google Scholar
Giles, H., Coupland, N. & Coupland, J., eds. (1991) Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, Z. M. (2003) A reversed word length effect in coordinating the preparation and articulation of words in speaking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10:603–609.Google Scholar
Menenti, L., Gierhan, S., Segaert, K. & Hagoort, P. (2011) Shared language: Overlap and segregation of the neuronal infrastructure for speaking and listening revealed by fMRI. Psychological Science 22:1173–82.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. (2004) Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(2):169–90; discussion 91–226.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. (2103) An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36(4):329–92.Google Scholar
Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H. & Knoblich, G. (2006) Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10(2):70–76. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephens, G. J., Silbert, L. J. & Hasson, U. (2010) Speaker-listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107:14425–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tollefsen, D. & Dale, R. (2012) Naturalizing joint action: A process-based approach. Philosophical Psychology 25:385–407.Google Scholar
Traxler, M. J. (2012) Introduction to psycholinguistics: Understanding language science. Wiley.Google Scholar