Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:06:33.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Network models can help focus research on the role of culture and context in psychopathology, but don't discount latent variable models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Nuwan Jayawickreme ,
Andrew Rasmussen ,
Alison Karasz ,
Jay Verkuilen  and
Eranda Jayawickreme
Nuwan Jayawickreme
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Manhattan College, The Bronx, NY 10471. [email protected]://manhattan.edu/campus-directory/nuwan.jayawickreme
Andrew Rasmussen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Fordham University, The Bronx, NY 10458. [email protected]://www.fordham.edu/info/21660/faculty_and_staff/5435/andrew_rasmussen
Alison Karasz
Affiliation:
Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, The Bronx, NY 10461. [email protected]://www.einstein.yu.edu/faculty/309/alison-karasz/
Jay Verkuilen
Affiliation:
Department of Education Psychology, City University of New York Graduate Center, New York, NY 10016. [email protected]://www.gc.cuny.edu/Faculty/Core-Bios/Jay-Verkuilen
Eranda Jayawickreme
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109. [email protected]://college.wfu.edu/sites/eranda-jayawickreme/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Borsboom et al. correctly note that the use of latent variable models in cross-cultural research has resulted in a futile search for universal, biological causes of psychopathology; however, this is not an inevitable outcome of such models. While network analytic approaches require further development, network models have the potential to better elucidate the role of cultural and contextual variables related to psychopathology.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 42 , 2019 , e14
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borsboom, D. & Cramer, A. O. J. (2013) Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 9:91–121.Google Scholar
Chhim, S. (2012) Baksbat (broken courage): The development and validation of the inventory to measure baksbat, a Cambodian trauma-based cultural syndrome of distress. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 36:640–59.Google Scholar
De Schryver, M., Vindevogel, S., Rasmussen, A. E. & Cramer, A. O. J. (2015) Unpacking constructs: A network approach for studying war exposure, daily stressors and post-traumatic stress disorder. Frontiers in Psychology 6: article 1896. (Online publication). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01896. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01896/full.Google Scholar
Fried, E. I. & Cramer, A. O. J. (2017) Moving forward: Challenges and directions for psychopathological network theory and methodology. Perspectives on Psychological Science 12(6):999–1020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/174569161770589 and at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1745691617705892.Google Scholar
Gone, J. P. & Kirmayer, L. J. (2010) On the wisdom of considering culture and context in psychopathology. In: Contemporary directions in psychopathology: Scientific foundations of the DSM-V and ICD-11, ed. Millon, T., Krueger, R. F. & Simonsen, E., pp. 72–96. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hinton, D. E. & Good, B. J. (2016) The culturally sensitive assessment of trauma: Eleven analytic perspectives, a typology of errors, and the multiplex models of distress generation. In: Culture and PTSD: Trauma in global and historical perspective, ed. Good, B. J. & Hinton, D. E., pp. 50–113. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Jayawickreme, N., Mootoo, C., Fountain, C., Rasmussen, A., Jayawickreme, E. & Bertuccio, R. (2017) Post-conflict struggles as networks of problems: A network analysis of trauma, daily stressors and psychological distress among Sri Lankan war survivors. Social Science and Medicine 190:119–32.Google Scholar
Jordans, M. J. D., Semrau, M., Thornicroft, G. & van Ommeren, M. (2012) Role of current perceived needs in explaining the association between past trauma exposure and distress in humanitarian settings in Jordan and Nepal. British Journal of Psychiatry 201:276–81.Google Scholar
Kirmayer, L. J. & Ryder, A. G. (2016) Culture and psychopathology. Current Opinion in Psychology 8:143–48.Google Scholar
Kleinman, A. (1988) Rethinking psychiatry: From cultural category to personal experience. The Free Press.Google Scholar
Littlewood, R (2002) Pathologies of the West: An anthropology of mental illness in Europe and America. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, M. W., Chiu, C. & Liu, Z. (2015) Polycultural psychology. Annual Review of Psychology 66:631–59.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, A., Katoni, B., Keller, A. S. & Wilkinson, J. (2011) Posttraumatic idioms of distress among Darfur refugees: Hozun and Majnun. Transcultural Psychiatry 48:392–415.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, A., Nguyen, L., Wilkinson, J., Vundla, S., Raghavan, S., Miller, K. & Keller, A. (2010) Rates and impact of trauma and current stressors among Darfuri refugees in Eastern Chad. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 80:227–36.Google Scholar
Ryder, A. G., Ban, L. M. & Chentsova-Dutton, Y. E. (2011) Towards a cultural-clinical psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 5/12:960–75.Google Scholar
Skrondal, A. & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2004) Generalized latent variable modeling: Multilevel, longitudinal and structural equation models. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.Google Scholar
Wright, A. G. C. (2017) Factor analytic support for the five-factor model. In: The Oxford handbook of the five factor model of personality, ed. Widiger, T. A., pp. 217–42. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar