No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The influence of stories including myths of origin
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2025
Abstract
Sijilmassi et al. argue that myths serve to gain coalitional support by detailing shared histories of ancestry and cooperation. They overlook the emotional influences of stories, which include myths of human origin. We suggest that influential myths do not promote cooperation principally by signaling common ancestry, but by prompting human emotions of interdependence and connection.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Anonymous. (1500–1000 BCE). The Rigveda: The earliest religious poetry of India (Brereton, J. P. & Jamison, S. W., Trans.). Oxford University Press (current edition 2014).Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kotovych, M., Dixon, P., Bortolussi, M., & Holden, M. (2011). Textual determinants of a component of literary identification. Scientific Study of Literature, 1, 260–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mar, R. A. (2018). Evaluating whether stories can promote social cognition: Introducing the social processes and content entrained by narrative (SPaCEN) framework. Discourse Processes, 55, 454–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oatley, K. (2016). Fiction: Simulation of social worlds. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 618–628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schipper, M., Ye, S., & Yin, H. (2011). China's creation and origin myths: Cross-cultural explorations in oral and written traditions. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, R. (1992). Stolen continents: The “New World” through Indian eyes. Penguin Canada.Google Scholar
Target article
“Our roots run deep”: Historical myths as culturally evolved technologies for coalitional recruitment
Related commentaries (25)
A terror management theory perspective on the appeal of historical myths
Adaptive lags, illusions and common interest
Beyond our “ancient roots”: Toward a broader understanding of the motivational power of societal meta-narratives
Collective selfhood as a psychically necessary illusion
Group myths can create shared understanding even if they don't act as superstimuli
Historical myths are believed because audiences are socially motivated
Historical myths as commitment devices
Historical myths define group boundaries: A mathematical sketch and evidence from Ukraine
Historical myths promote cooperation through affective states
Homo historicus: History as psychological science
Limited evidence that fitness interdependence produces historical origin myths
Myth as model: Group-level interpretive frameworks
Mythos in the light of evolution
Myths and fitness interdependence: Beyond coalitional longevity
Myths and prestige in Hindu nationalist politics
Myths of trauma and myths of cooperation: Diverse consequences of history for societal cohesion
Past glories feel good but creative minorities push us forward
The influence of stories including myths of origin
The social cognitive evolution of myths: Collective narratives of shared pasts as markers for coalitions' communicative and cooperative prowess
The social identity approach offers a more parsimonious and complete explanation of historical myths’ function and characteristics
The Trojan horse of historical myths: Emotion-driven narratives as a strategy for coalitional recruitment
Uncertainty reduction as an alternative explanation of historical myths
What about language?
Why some coalitions benefit from historical myths more than others
“We are one people”: Group myths also draw cues from self-concept formation
Author response
Coalitional psychology and the evolution of nationalistic cultures