Slavic Languages

doi:10.1017/9781107279872.013

12 - Slavic Languages

from Part II - Case Studies for Areal Linguistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 May 2017

Alan Timberlake

Edited by

Raymond Hickey

Show author details

Raymond Hickey: Affiliation:
Universität Duisburg–Essen

Book contents

Get access

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics , pp. 331 - 355

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107279872.013 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abondolo, Daniel (ed.), 1997a. The Uralic Languages. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Abondolo, Daniel, 1997b. Introduction. In Abondolo, (ed.), pp. 1–42.Google Scholar

Alexiou, Margaret, 2002. After Antiquity: Greek Language, Myth, and Metaphor. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Andersen, Henning, 1996. Reconstructing Prehistorical Dialects: Initial Vowels in Slavic and Baltic. Trends in Linguistics, vol. 91. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Anthony, David, 1990. Migration in archeology: The baby and the bathwater. American Anthropologist 92: 895–914.Google Scholar

Barford, P. M., 2001. The Early Slavs: Culture and Society in Early Medieval Eastern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Baxter, William H., 1992. A Handbook of Old Chinese Phonology. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Berger, Tilman, 2014. The convergence of Czech and German between the years 900 and 1500. In Besters-Dilger, et al. (eds), pp. 189–198.Google Scholar

Besters-Dilger, Juliane, Dermarkar, Cynthia, Pfänder, Stefan and Rabus, Achim (eds), 2014. Congruence in Contact-induced Language Change: Language Families, Typological Resemblance, and Perceived Similarity. Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies, School of Language and Literature, Linguae & Litterae, vol. 27. Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Bickell, Balthasar and Nichols, Johanna, 2006. Oceania, the Pacific Rim, and the theory of linguistic areas. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, vol. 32. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar

de Boel, Gunnar, 2008. The genesis of clitic doubling from Ancient to Medieval Greek. In Kallulli, and Tasmowski, (eds), pp. 89–103.Google Scholar

Brüske, Wolfgang, 1955. Untersuchungen zur Geschichte des Lutizenbundes: Deutsch-wendische Beziehungen des 10.–12. Jahrhunderts. Mitteldeutsche Forschungen, vol. 3. Münster: Böhlau.Google Scholar

Butt, John and Benjamin, Carmen, 2004. A New Reference Grammar of Modern Spanish, fourth edition. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Curta, Florin, 2011. The Edinburgh History of the Greeks, c. 500 to 1050: the Early Middle Ages. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen, 2001. The origin of the Scandinavian languages. In Dahl, Östen and Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria (eds), The Circum-Baltic Languages, vol. 1: Past and Present: Typology and Contact, pp. 215–236. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Damme, Robert, 1987. Westslavische Reliktwörter in Stralsunder Vokabular. In Ureland, P. Sture (ed.), Sprachkontakt in der Hanse: Aspekte des Sprachausgleichs im Ostsee- und Nordseeraum. Akten der 7. Internationalen Symposions über Sprachkontakt in Europa, Lübeck 1986, pp. 163–178. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Eliot, C. N. E., 1890. A Finnish Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Emeneau, M. B., 1956. India as a linguistic area. Language 32: 3–16.Google Scholar

Endzelin, J., 1901. Ursprung und Gebrauch des lettischen Debitivs. Beiträge zur Kunde der indogermanischen Sprachen (Bezzenbergers Beiträge) 26: 66–74.Google Scholar

Feldbrugge, F. J. M., 2009. Law in Medieval Russia. Leiden and Boston: M. Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Friedman, Victor, 2008. Balkan object reduplication in areal and dialectological perspective. In Kallulli, and Tasmowski, (eds), pp. 33–64.Google Scholar

Gebauer, Jan, 1929. Historická mluvnice českého jazyka, vol. 4: Skladba [Historical Grammar of Czech: Syntax]. Prague: Česká Akademie Vĕd a Umĕní.Google Scholar

Gimbutas, Marija, 1971. The Slavs. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Gippius, A. A., 1996. ‘Russkaja Pravda’ i ‘Voprošanie Kirika’ v Novgorodskoj Kormčej 1282 g. (k xarakteristike jazykovoj situacii drevnego Novgoroda) [‘Russian Law Code’ and ‘Kirik’s Questions’ in the Novgorod Nomocanon of 1282 (toward a characterization of the language situation of Old Novgorod)]. Slavjanovedenie 1996.1: 48–62.Google Scholar

Hill, Jane, 2001. Languages on the ground: Toward an anthropological dialectology. In Terrell, John Edward (ed.), Archeology, Language, and History: Essays on Culture and Ethnicity, pp. 257–282. Westport, CT and London: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul and Thompson, Sandra A., 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56 (2): 251–299.Google Scholar

Jablonskis, Jonas, 1922. Lietuvių kalbos gramatika. Etimologija: Vidurinėms mokslo įstaigoms [Grammar of Lithuanian Etymology: For Institutions of Secondary Education], second edition. Kaunas: Švyturio bendrovės leidinys.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman, 1931. K xarakteristike evrazijskogo jazykovogo sojuza [Toward the Characterization of the Eurasian Linguistic Area]. Paris: Izd. Evraziitsev. Reprinted in 1962, Selected Writings, vol. 1: Phonological Studies, pp. 144–201, The Hague and Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar

Johansen, Paul and von zur Mühlen, Heinz, 1973. Deutsch und Undeutsch im mittelalterlichen und frühneuzeitlichen Reval. Ostmitteleuropa in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart, vol. 15. Köln: Böhlau, 1973.Google Scholar

Joseph, Brian D., 1983. The Synchrony and Diachrony of the Balkan Infinitive: A Study in Areal, General, and Historical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Joseph, Brian D., 2010. Language contact in the Balkans. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact, pp. 619–633. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kallulli, Dalina and Tasmowski, Liliane, 2008. Clitic Doubling in the Balkan Languages. Linguistik aktuell, vol. 130. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kantzow, Thomas, 1816. Pomerania, oder, Ursprunck, Altheit und Geschicht der Völcker und Lande Pomern, Cassuben, Wenden, Stettin, Rhügen in vierzehn Büchern, edited by Rosengarten, Hans Gottfried Ludwig, vol. 1. Greifswald: Mauritins.Google Scholar

Koškins, Igors, 1996. Deutsches Lehngut in den altrussischen Novgoroder Urkunden. In Brandt, Gisela (ed.), Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache im Baltikum, pp. 87–98. Stuttgart: Hans Dieter Heinz.Google Scholar

Kuz´mina, I. B. and Nemčenko, E. V., 1971. Sintaksis pričastnyx form v russkix govorax [The Syntax of Participial Forms in Russian Dialects]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar

Laca, Brenda, 2006. El objeto directo: La marcación preposicional [The direct object: Prepositional marking]. In Company, Concepción Company (ed.), Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española, part 1: La frase verbal [Historical Syntax of Spanish: The Verb Phrase], pp. 423–478. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar

Lorentz, Friedrich, 1903. Slovinzische Grammatik. St Petersburg: Vtoroe Otdelenie Imperatorskoj Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar

Lübben, August, 1888. Mittelniederdeutsches Handwörterbuch. Nach dem Tode des Verfassers vollendet von Christoph Walther. Norden: D. Soltau.Google Scholar

McAnallen, Julia, 2011. The History of Predicative Possession in Slavic: Internal Development vs. Language Contact. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Merrill, Jessica, 2012. The Role of Folklore Study in the Rise of Russian Formalist and Czech Structuralist Literary Theory. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Obolensky, Dimitri, 1971. The Byzantine Commonwealth: Eastern Europe, 500–1453. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Orzechowska, Hanna, 1973. Podwajanie dopełnień w historii bułgarskiego języka literackiego [Object doubling in the history of the Bulgarian literary language]. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar

Otsmaa, Lilia, 1975. O russkix zaimstvovanijax v baltijskom nižnenemeckom jazyke [On Russian borrowings in Baltic Low German]. Linguistica 6: 86–113.Google Scholar

Schick, Ivanka, 2000. Clitic doubling constructions in Balkan–Slavic languages. In Beukema, Frits and den Dikken, Marcel (eds), Clitic Phenomena in European Languages, pp. 259–292. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stoianovich, Traian, 1960. The conquering Balkan Orthodox merchant. The Journal of Economic History 20: 234–313.Google Scholar

Svantesson, Jan-Olof, Tsendina, Anna, Karlsson, Anastasia and Franzén, Vivan, 2005. The Phonology of Mongolian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah Grey and Kaufman, Terrence, 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Timberlake, Alan, 1974. The Nominative Object in Slavic, Baltic, and West Finnic. Munich: Otto Sagner.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tomić, Olga, 2004. The Balkan Sprachbund: Introduction. In Tomić, Olga (ed.), Balkan Syntax and Semantics, pp. 1–55. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Toporov, V. N. and Trubačev, O. N., 1962. Lingvističeskij analiz gidronimov Verxnego Podneprov´ja [Linguistic Analysis of Hydronyms of the Upper Dnepr Region]. Moscow: Akademija Nauk SSSR.Google Scholar

Vasmer, Max, 1941. Die Slaven in Griechenland. Berlin: Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Văžarova, Živka N., 1965. Slavjanski i slavjanobălgarski selišta v bălgarskite zemi VI–XI vek [Slavic and Slavobulgarian Settlements on Bulgarian Territory from the Sixth through the Eleventh Century]. Sofia: Bălgarska Akademija na Naukite.Google Scholar

Veenker, Wolfgang, 1967. Die Frage des finnougrischen Substrats in der russischen Sprache. Indiana University Publications, Uralic and Altaic Series, vol. 82. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Viitso, Tiit-Rein, 1997. Estonian. In Abondolo, (ed.), pp. 115–148.Google Scholar

VoprKir, 1888. Voprosy Kirika, Savvy i Il´i, s otvetami Nifonta, episkopa Novgorodskogo, i drugix ierarxičeskix lic, no. 2: Pamjatniki drevne-russkogo kanoničeskogo prava, pt. 1. Russkaja istoričeskaja biblioteka, izdavaemaja Arxeografičeskoj Kommissiej, vol. 6. [The Questions of Kirik, Savva, and Ilja, with Answers of Nifont, Bishop of Novgorod, and of Other Clerics. Monuments of Old Russian Canon Law. Russian Historical Library, published by the Archaeographic Commission]. St Petersburg.Google Scholar

Vryonis, Spiros, 1981. The evolution of Slavic society and the Slavic invasions in Greece: The first major Slavic attack on Thessaloniki, A.D. 597. Hesperia 50: 378–390.Google Scholar

Wiemer, Björn, Seržant, Ilja and Erker, Aksana, 2014. Convergence in the Baltic–Slavic contact zone: Triangulation approach. In Besters-Dilger, et al. (eds), pp. 15–42.Google Scholar

Willis, David, 2013. Negation in the history of the Slavonic languages. In Willis, David, Lucas, Christopher and Breitbarth, Anne (eds), The History of Negation in the Languages of Europe and the Mediterranean, vol. 1: Case Studies, pp. 341–398. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Witte, Hans, 1906. Wendische Zu- und Familiennamen aus mecklenburgischen Urkunden und Akten gesammelt und mit Unterstützung des Herrn Prof. Dr. Ernst Mucke zu Freiberg (Sachsen) bearbeitet. Mecklenburgischer Jahrbücher, Verein für Mecklenburgische Geschichte und Altertumskunde 71: 153–290.Google Scholar

Zaicz, Gábor, 1997. Mordva. In Abondolo, (ed.), pp. 184–218.Google Scholar

Zaliznjak, Andrej A., 2004. Drevnenovgorodskij dialekt, 2-e izd., pererabotannoe s učetom materiala naxodok 1995–2003 gg. [Old Novgorod Dialect, second edition, revised with consideration of finds 1995–2003]. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul′tury.Google Scholar

Book contents

12 - Slavic Languages

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive