Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Areas, Areal Features and Areality
- Part I Issues in Areal Linguistics
- Part II Case Studies for Areal Linguistics
- 9 The Germanic Languages and Areal Linguistics
- 10 Britain and Ireland1
- 11 Varieties of English
- 12 Slavic Languages
- 13 The Caucasus
- 14 Western Asia: East Anatolia as a Transition Zone
- 15 An Areal View of Africa
- 16 Areal Contact in Nilo-Saharan
- 17 Niger-Congo Languages
- 18 The Kalahari Basin Area as a ‘Sprachbund’ before the Bantu Expansion
- 19 South Africa and Areal Linguistics
- 20 Jharkhand as a ‘Linguistic Area’: Language Contact Between Indo-Aryan and Munda in Eastern-Central South Asia
- 21 Sri Lanka and South India
- 22 The Transeurasian Languages
- 23 The Changing Profile of Case Marking in the Northeastern Siberia Area
- 24 Languages of China in their East and Southeast Asian Context
- 25 Language in the Mainland Southeast Asia Area
- 26 Southeast Asian Tone in Areal Perspective
- 27 The Areal Linguistics of Australia
- 28 Languages of the New Guinea Region
- 29 Languages of Eastern Melanesia
- 30 The Western Micronesian Sprachbund
- 31 Native North American Languages
- 32 The Areal Linguistics of Amazonia
- 33 Linguistic Areas, Linguistic Convergence and River Systems in South America
- Index
- References
33 - Linguistic Areas, Linguistic Convergence and River Systems in South America
from Part II - Case Studies for Areal Linguistics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 May 2017
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Areas, Areal Features and Areality
- Part I Issues in Areal Linguistics
- Part II Case Studies for Areal Linguistics
- 9 The Germanic Languages and Areal Linguistics
- 10 Britain and Ireland1
- 11 Varieties of English
- 12 Slavic Languages
- 13 The Caucasus
- 14 Western Asia: East Anatolia as a Transition Zone
- 15 An Areal View of Africa
- 16 Areal Contact in Nilo-Saharan
- 17 Niger-Congo Languages
- 18 The Kalahari Basin Area as a ‘Sprachbund’ before the Bantu Expansion
- 19 South Africa and Areal Linguistics
- 20 Jharkhand as a ‘Linguistic Area’: Language Contact Between Indo-Aryan and Munda in Eastern-Central South Asia
- 21 Sri Lanka and South India
- 22 The Transeurasian Languages
- 23 The Changing Profile of Case Marking in the Northeastern Siberia Area
- 24 Languages of China in their East and Southeast Asian Context
- 25 Language in the Mainland Southeast Asia Area
- 26 Southeast Asian Tone in Areal Perspective
- 27 The Areal Linguistics of Australia
- 28 Languages of the New Guinea Region
- 29 Languages of Eastern Melanesia
- 30 The Western Micronesian Sprachbund
- 31 Native North American Languages
- 32 The Areal Linguistics of Amazonia
- 33 Linguistic Areas, Linguistic Convergence and River Systems in South America
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics , pp. 964 - 996Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Adelaar, Willem (with Muysken, Pieter), 2004. The Languages of the Andes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Adelaar, Willem, 2008. Towards a typological profile of the Andean languages. In Lubotsky, Alexander, Schaeken, Jos and Wiedenhof, Jeroen (eds), Evidence and Counter-Evidence: Essays in Honour of Frederik Kortlandt, vol. 2: General Linguistics, pp. 23–33. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., 2002. Language Contact in Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Birchall, Joshua, 2014a. Verbal argument marking patterns in South American languages. In O’Connor, and Muysken, (eds), pp. 223–249.Google Scholar
Birchall, Joshua, 2014b. Argument Realization in the Languages of South America. Doctoral dissertation, Radboud University, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Bowern, Claire, Epps, Patience, Gray, Russell et al., 2011. Does lateral transmission obscure inheritance in hunter–gatherer languages? PLoS ONE 6 (9): e25195.Google Scholar
Brackelaire, Vincent and Azanha, Gilberto, 2006. Últimos pueblos indígenas aislados en América Latina: Reto a la supervivencia [Last isolated indigenous peoples in Latin America: The challenge of their Survival]. In Lenguas y Tradiciones Orales de la Amazonía: ¿Diversidad en Peligro? [Languages and Oral Traditions of Amazonia: Diversity in Peril?], pp. 313–367. La Habana: Casa de las Américas.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle, Kaufman, Terrence and Smith-Stark, Thomas C., 1986. Meso-America as a linguistic area. Language 62 (3): 530–570.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle, 2012a. Classification of the indigenous languages of South America. In Campbell, Lyle and Grondona, Verónica (eds), The Indigenous Languages of South America: A Comprehensive Guide, pp. 59–166. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle, 2012b. Typological characteristics of South American indigenous languages. In Campbell, Lyle and Grondona, Verónica (eds), The Indigenous Languages of South America: A Comprehensive Guide, pp. 259–330. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle, this volume, Chapter 2. Why is it so hard to define a linguistic area?Google Scholar
Chang, Will and Michael, Lev, 2014. A relaxed admixture model of contact. Language Dynamics and Change 4 (1): 1–26.Google Scholar
Constenla-Umaña, Adolfo, 1991. Las Lenguas del Area Intermedia: Introducción a su Estudio Areal [The Languages of the Intermediate Area: Introduction to Their Areal Study]. San José: Editorial de la Universidad de Costa Rica.Google Scholar
Crevels, Mily and van der Voort, Hein, 2008. The Guaporé-Mamoré region as a linguistic area. In Muysken, Pieter (ed.), From Linguistic Areas to Areal Linguistics, pp. 151–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen, Gillam, J. Christopher, Anderson, David G., Iriarte, José and Copé, Silvia M., 2012. Linguistic diversity zones and cartographic modeling: GIS as a method for understanding the prehistory of lowland South America. In Hornborg, Alf and Hill, Jonathan David (eds), Ethnicity in Ancient Amazonia: Reconstructing Past Identities from Archaeology, Linguistics, and Ethnohistory, pp. 211–224. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, Desmond C. and Pullum, Geoffrey K., 1986. Introduction. In Derbyshire, Desmond C. and Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds), Handbook of Amazonian Languages, vol. 1, pp. 1–28. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., 1999. Other small families and isolates. In Dixon, Robert M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds), The Amazonian Languages, pp. 341–381. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dunne, Thomas and Mertes, Leal Anne Kerry, 2007. Rivers. In Veblen, Thomas T., Young, Kenneth R. and Orme, Anthony R. (eds), The Physical Geography of South America, pp. 76–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eriksen, Love, 2011. Nature and Culture in Prehistoric Amazonia. PhD Dissertation, Lund University.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas and Levinson, Stephen C., 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (5): 429–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Gijn, Rik, 2014a. The Andean foothills and adjacent Amazonian fringe. In O’Connor, and Muysken, (eds), pp. 102–125.Google Scholar
van Gijn, Rik, 2014b. Subordination strategies in South America: Nominalization. In O’Connor, and Muysken, (eds), pp. 274–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H., 1987. Language in the Americas. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hammarström, Harald and O’Connor, Loretta, 2013. Dependency-sensitive typological distance. In Borin, Lars and Saxena, Anju (eds), Approaches to Measuring Linguistic Differences, pp. 337–360. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Hammarström, Harald and Güldemann, Tom, 2014. Quantifying geographical determinants of large-scale distributions of linguistic features. Language Dynamics and Change 4 (1): 87–115.Google Scholar
van de Kerke, Simon and Muysken, Pieter, 2014. The Andean matrix. In O’Connor, and Muysken, (eds), pp. 126–151.Google Scholar
Krasnoukhova, Olga, 2012. The Noun Phrase in the Languages of South America. Doctoral dissertation, Radboud University, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Krasnoukhova, Olga, 2014. The noun phrase: Focus on demonstratives, redrawing the semantic map. In O’Connor, and Muysken, (eds), pp. 250–273.Google Scholar
Michael, Lev, Chang, Will and Stark, Tammy, 2014. Exploring phonological areality in the circum-Andean region using a Naive Bayes Classifier. Language Dynamics and Change 4 (1): 27–86.Google Scholar
Müller, Neele, 2014. Language internal and external factors in the development of the desiderative in South American indigenous languages. In O’Connor, and Muysken, (eds), pp. 203–222.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter, 2010. Scenarios for language contact. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact, pp. 265–281. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter, 2012. Contacts between indigenous languages in South America. In Grondona, Veronica and Campbell, Lyle (eds), Handbook of South American Historical Linguistics, pp. 235–258. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter, Hammarström, Harald, Birchall, Joshua et al., 2014. The languages of South America: Deep families, areal relationships, and language contact. In O’Connor, and Muysken, (eds), pp. 299–322.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter, Hammarström, Harald, Birchall, Joshua, van Gijn, Rik, Krasnoukhova, Olga and Müller, Neele, 2015. Linguistic areas, bottom up or top down? The case of the Guaporé-Mamoré. In Comrie, Bernard and Golluscio, Lucia (eds), Language Contact and Documentation, pp. 205–238. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nettle, Daniel, 1996. Language diversity in West Africa: An ecological approach. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 15 (4): 403–438.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna, 1990. Linguistic diversity and the first settlement of the New World. Language 66 (3): 475–521.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna, 1992. Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nordhoff, Sebastian, Hammarström, Harald, Forkel, Robert and Haspelmath, Martin, 2013. Glottolog 2.1. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://glottolog.orgGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, Loretta and Muysken, Pieter (eds), 2014. The Native Languages of South America: Origins, Development, Typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Orme, Anthony R., 2007. The tectonic framework of South America. In Veblen, Thomas T., Young, Kenneth R. and Orme, Anthony R. (eds), The Physical Geography of South America, pp. 3–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris, 1990. Morphological characteristics of Amazonian languages. In Payne, Doris (ed.), Amazonian Linguistics: Studies in Lowland South American Languages, pp. 213–241. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Seki, Lucy, 1999. The Upper Xingú as an incipient linguistic area. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds), The Amazonian Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 417–430.Google Scholar
Tessmann, Günter, 1930. Die Indianer Nordost-Perus: Grundlegende Forschungen für eine systematische Kulturkunde. Hamburg: Friedrichsen, de Gruyter and Co.Google Scholar
Torero, Alfredo, 2002. Idiomas de los Andes: Lingüística e Historia [Languages of the Andes: Linguistics and History]. Lima: IFEA and Editorial Horizonte.Google Scholar