Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-76ns8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T05:53:55.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Jharkhand as a ‘Linguistic Area’: Language Contact Between Indo-Aryan and Munda in Eastern-Central South Asia

from Part II - Case Studies for Areal Linguistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2017

Raymond Hickey
Affiliation:
Universität Duisburg–Essen
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbi, Anvita, 1997. Languages in contact in Jharkhand. In Abbi, Anvita (ed.), Languages of Tribal and Indigenous Peoples of India: The Ethnic Space, pp. 131148. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gregory D. S., 2007. The Munda Verb: Typological Perspectives. Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs, vol. 174. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gregory D. S. (ed.), 2008. The Munda Languages. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gregory D. S. and Harrison, K. David, 2008. Sora. In Anderson, (ed.), pp. 299380.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Bisang, Walter and Yādava, Yogendra P., 1999. Face vs. empathy: The social foundation of Maithili verb agreement. Linguistics 37 (3): 481518.Google Scholar
Chatterji, Suniti Kumar, 1926. The Origin and Development of the Bengali Language: With a Foreword by Sir George Abraham Grierson. Third impression, 2002, New Delhi: Rupa.Google Scholar
Deeney, John J., , S.J., 1975. Ho Grammar and Vocabulary. Chaibasa: Xavier Ho Publications, St. Xavier’s High School.Google Scholar
Donegan, Patricia and Stampe, David, 2004. Rhythm and the synthetic drift of Munda. In Singh, Rajendra (ed.), The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, 2004, pp. 336. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ebert, Karen, 1999. Nonfinite verbs in Kiranti languages: An areal perspective. In Yadava, Yogendra P. and Glover, Warren W. (eds), Topics in Nepalese Linguistics, pp. 371400. Kathmandu: Royal Nepal Academy.Google Scholar
Ebert, Karen, 2001. Südasien als Sprachbund. In Haspelmath, Martin, König, Ekkhard, Oesterreicher, Wulf and Raible, Wolfgang (eds), Sprachtypologie und sprachliche Universalien: Ein internationales Handbuch. Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, vol. 20.2.Google Scholar
Emeneau, Murray B., 1956. India as a linguistic area. Language 32: 316.Google Scholar
Genetti, Carol, 1999. Variation in agreement in the Nepali finite verb. In Yadava, Yogendra P. and Glover, Warren W. (eds), Topics in Nepalese Linguistics, pp. 542555. Kathmandu: Royal Nepal Academy.Google Scholar
Ghosh, Arun, 2008. Santali. In Anderson, (ed.), pp. 1198.Google Scholar
Grierson, Sir George Abraham, 1903. Linguistic Survey of India, vol. V: Indo-Aryan Family, Eastern Group, part II: Specimens of the Bihari and Oriya Languages. Calcutta.Google Scholar
Grignard, A., 1924. A Grammar of the Oraon Language and Study in Oraon Idiom. Calcutta: Catholic Orphan Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Revd Johann, S.J., 1905/1909. Mundari Grammar and Exercises, parts I and II. Reprint 2001, New Delhi: Gyan Publishing House.Google Scholar
Jordan-Horstmann, Monika, 1969. Sadani: A Bhojpuri Dialect Spoken in Chotanagpur. Indologia Berolinensis, vol. 1. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Kullū, Paulus, 1992. Tonme kol-āṅgre [The New Testament]. Ranchi: Catholic Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul, Simons, Gary F. and Fennig, Charles D. (eds), 2013. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, seventeenth edition. Dallas, TX: SIL International. www.ethnologue.comGoogle Scholar
Masica, Colin P., 1976. Defining a Linguistic Area: South Asia. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Neukom, Lukas, 2001. Santali. Languages of the World/Materials, vol. 323. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Neukom, Lukas and Patnaik, Manideepa, 2003. A Grammar of Oriya. Zürich: Universität Zürich.Google Scholar
Nowrangi, Peter Shanti, 1956. A Simple Sadāni Grammar. Ranchi: D.S.S. Book Depot.Google Scholar
Osada, Toshiki, 1991. Linguistic convergence in the Chotanagpur area. In Mullick, S. Bosu (ed.), Cultural Chotanagpur: Unity in Diversity, pp. 99119. New Delhi: Uppal Publishing House.Google Scholar
Osada, Toshiki, 1992. A Reference Grammar of Mundari. Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Osada, Toshiki, 2008. Mundari. In Anderson, (ed.), pp. 99164.Google Scholar
Patnaik, Manideepa, 2008. Juang. In Anderson, (ed.), pp. 508556.Google Scholar
Peterson, John, 2010. Language contact in Jharkhand: Linguistic convergence between Munda and Indo-Aryan in eastern-central India. Himalayan Linguistics 9 (2): 5686. escholarship.org/uc/item/489929c1Google Scholar
Peterson, John, 2011. A Grammar of Kharia: A South Munda Language. Brill Studies in South and Southwestern Asian Languages, vol. 1. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Pinnow, Heinz-Jürgen, 1966. A comparative study of the verb in the Munda languages. In Zide, Norman H. (ed.), Studies in Comparative Austroasiatic Linguistics. Indo-Iranian Monographs, vol. V. London, The Hague and Paris: Mouton and Co.Google Scholar
Radice, William, 1994. Bengali: A Complete Course for Beginners. Teach Yourself series. London: Hodder, and Chicago: NTC.Google Scholar
Shukla, Shaligram, 1981. Bhojpuri Grammar. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Hanne-Ruth, 2012. Bengali. London Oriental and African Language Library, vol. 18. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tiwari, Udai Narain, 1960. The Origin and Development of Bhojpuri. The Asiatic Society, Monograph Series, vol. X. Calcutta: The Asiatic Society.Google Scholar
Verma, Manindra K., 1991. Exploring the parameters of agreement. Language Sciences 13 (2): 125143.Google Scholar
Yadav, Ramawatar, 1996. A Reference Grammar of Maithili. Trends in Linguistics, Documentation, vol. 11. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×