Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., 2006. Serial verb constructions in a typological perspective. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., and Dixon, Robert M. W. (eds), Serial Verb Constructions: A Cross-linguistic Typology, pp. 1–68. Explorations in Linguistic Typology, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Batibo, Herman M. and Tsonope, Joe (eds), 2000. The State of Khoesan Languages in Botswana. Gaborone: Basarwa Languages Project.Google Scholar

Beach, Douglas M., 1938. The Phonetics of the Hottentot Language. Cambridge: Heffer and Sons.Google Scholar

Bell, Arthur and Washburn, Paul (eds), 2001. Khoisan: Syntax, Phonetics, Phonology, and Contact. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar

Bleek, Dorothea F., 1928–1930. Bushman grammar: A grammatical sketch of the language of the ǀxam-ka-ǃk’e, Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen 19: 81–98; 20: 161–174.Google Scholar

Bleek, Dorothea F., 1956. A Bushman Dictionary. New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar

Brenzinger, Matthias and Fehn, Anne-Maria, 2013. From body to knowledge: Perception and cognition in Khwe-ǁAni and Ts’ixa. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Storch, Anne (eds), Perception and Cognition in Language and Culture, pp. 161–191. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Brenzinger, Matthias and König, Christa (eds), 2010. Khoisan Languages and Linguistics: Proceedings of the First International Symposium January 4–8, 2003, Riezlern/Kleinwalsertal. Cologne: Köppe.Google Scholar

Chebanne, Anders M., 2000. The phonological system of the Cuaa language. In Batibo, and Tsonope, (eds), pp. 18–32.Google Scholar

Childs, G. Tucker, 1994. African ideophones. In Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna and Ohala, John J. (eds), Sound Symbolism, pp. 178–204. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Childs, G. Tucker, 2003. An Introduction to African Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Clements, George N., 2000. Phonology. In Heine, and Nurse, (eds), pp. 123–160.Google Scholar

Clements, George N. and Rialland, Annie, 2008. Africa as a phonological area. In Heine, Bernd and Nurse, Derek (eds), A Linguistic Geography of Africa, pp. 36–87. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cole, Desmond T., 1955. An Introduction to Tswana Grammar. Cape Town: Longman.Google Scholar

Collins, Chris, 2002. Multiple verb movement in ǂHoan. Linguistic Inquiry 33 (1): 1–29.Google Scholar

Collins, Chris, 2003. The internal structure of the verb phrase in Juǀ’hoansi and ǂHoan. Studia Linguistica 57 (1): 1–25.Google Scholar

Collins, Chris, 2004. The absence of the linker in double object constructions in Nǀuu. Studies in African Linguistics 33 (2): 163–198.Google Scholar

Collins, Chris and Namaseb, Levi, 2011. A Grammatical Sketch of Nǀuuki with Stories. Cologne: Köppe.Google Scholar

Dale, Desmond, 1975. A Basic English–Shona Dictionary. Gwelo: Mambo Press.Google Scholar

Daniel, Michael and Moravcsik, Edith A., 2005. The associative plural. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds), pp. 150–153.Google Scholar

den Besten, Hans, 1996. Associative DP. In Cremers, Crit and den Dikken, Marcel (eds), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1996, pp. 13–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Dickens, Patrick J., 1994. English–Juǀ’hoan/Juǀ’hoan–English Dictionary. Cologne: Köppe.Google Scholar

Dickens, Patrick J., 1997. Relative clauses in Juǀ’hoan. In Haacke, Wilfrid H. G. and Elderkin, Edward D. (eds), Namibian Languages: Reports and Papers, pp. 107–116. Cologne: Köppe.Google Scholar

Dickens, Patrick J., 2005. A Concise Grammar of Juǀ’hoan with a Juǀ’hoan–English Glossary and a Subject Index. Cologne: Köppe.Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark, 2012. Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass 6: 654–672.Google Scholar

Doke, Clement M., 1992 [1927]. Textbook of Zulu Grammar. Cape Town: Longman.Google Scholar

Doke, Clement M. et al., 1990. English–Zulu/Zulu–English Dictionary. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar

Donaldson, Bruce C., 1993. Afrikaans Grammar. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

ELCIN Church Council Special Committees, 1996. English–Ndonga Dictionary. Oniipa: ELCIN Printing Press.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H., 1950. Studies in African linguistic classification VI: The click languages. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 6 (3): 223–237.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H., 1959. Africa as a linguistic area. In Bascom, William R. and Herskovitz, Melville J. (eds), Continuity and Change in African Cultures, pp. 15–27. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H., 1963. The Languages of Africa. Bloomington, IN: Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics, Indiana University.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom, 1998. The Kalahari Basin as an object of areal typology: A first approach. In Schladt, Mathias (ed.), Language, Identity, and Conceptualization among the Khoisan, pp. 137–196. Cologne: Köppe.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom, 1999. Head-initial meets head-final: Nominal suffixes in eastern and southern Bantu from a historical perspective. Studies in African Linguistics 28 (1): 49–91.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom, 2000. Noun categorization in non-Khoe lineages of Khoisan. Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere 63: 5–33.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom, 2001. Phonological Regularities of Consonant Systems across Khoisan Lineages. Leipzig: Institut für Afrikanistik, Universität Leipzig.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom, 2002. Die Entlehnung pronominaler Elemente des Khoekhoe aus dem ǃUi-Taa. In Schumann, Theda et al. (eds), Aktuelle Forschungen zu Afrikanischen Sprachen: Sprachwissenschaftliche Beiträge zum 14. Afrikanistentag, Hamburg, 11.–14. Oktober 2000, pp. 43–61. Cologne: Köppe.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom, 2004. Linear order as a basic morphosyntactic factor in non-Khoe Khoisan. Paper presented at the International Conference ‘Syntax of the World’s Languages’, Leipzig, 5–8 August, 2004. www.iaaw.hu-berlin.de/afrika/linguistik-und-sprachen/mitarbeiter/1683070/dokumente/LinearWorldSyntaxH.pdfGoogle Scholar

Güldemann, Tom, 2006. Structural isoglosses between Khoekhoe and Tuu: The Cape as a linguistic area. In Matras, Yaron, McMahon, April and Vincent, Nigel (eds), Linguistic Areas: Convergence in Historical and Typological Perspective, pp. 99–134. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom, 2008a. A linguist’s view: Khoe-Kwadi speakers as the earliest food-producers of southern Africa. Southern African Humanities 20: 93–132.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom, 2008b. Greenberg’s ‘case’ for Khoisan: The morphological evidence. In Ibriszimow, Dymitr (ed.), Problems of Linguistic-Historical Reconstruction in Africa, pp. 123–153. Cologne: Köppe.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom, 2010a. Sprachraum and geography: Linguistic macro-areas in Africa. In Lameli, Alfred, Kehrein, Roland and Rabanus, Stefan (eds), Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation, vol. 2: Language Mapping, pp. 561–585. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom, 2010b. The relation between focus and theticity in the Tuu family. In Fiedler, Ines and Schwarz, Anne (eds), The Expression of Information Structure: A Documentation of its Diversity across Africa, pp. 69–93. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom, 2011. Perception verbs in Nǁng (!Ui, Tuu) and beyond. Paper presented at the third KBA workshop, Somlószőlős, Hungary, 7–9 January 2011. http://www2.hu-berlin.de/kba/events/hungary/perception-verbs.pdfGoogle Scholar

Güldemann, Tom, 2013a. Morphology: Taa (East !Xoon dialect). In Vossen, (ed.), pp. 234–241.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom, 2013b. Morphology: |Xam. In Vossen, (ed.), pp. 241–249.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom, 2013c. Syntax: Taa (East !Xoon dialect). In Vossen, (ed.), pp. 408–419.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom, 2013d. Syntax: |Xam. In Vossen, (ed.), pp. 419–431.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom, 2013e. Typology. In Vossen, (ed.), pp. 25–37.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom, 2013f. Using minority languages to inform the historical analysis of major written languages: A Tuu perspective on the ‘give’ ~ object marker polysemy in Sinitic. Journal of Asian and African Studies 85: 41–59.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom, 2014a. Introduction: ‘Khoisan’ linguistic classification today. In Güldemann, and Fehn, (eds), pp. 1–41.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom, 2014b. The Lower Nossob varieties of Tuu: !Ui, Taa or neither? In Güldemann, and Fehn, (eds), pp. 257–282.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom, in press. Did Proto-Tuu have a paradigm of cardinal numerals? In Beyer, Klaus et al. (eds), New Perspectives on African Languages. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom and Fehn, Anne-Maria (eds), 2014. Beyond ‘Khoisan’: Historical Relations in the Kalahari Basin. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom and Loughnane, Robyn, 2012. Are there ‘Khoisan’ roots in body-part vocabulary? On linguistic inheritance and contact in the Kalahari Basin. Language Dynamics and Change 2 (2): 215–258.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom and Pratchett, Lee J., 2014. KoMmenting on ǂKx’aoǁ’ae. Paper presented at the 5th International Symposium on Khoisan Languages and Linguistics, Riezlern, 14–16 July 2014.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom and Vossen, Rainer, 2000. Khoisan. In Heine, and Nurse, (eds), pp. 99–122.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom and Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena, 2013. The risks of analysis without spoken language corpora: Clause-second ke in Richtersveld Nama and Nǁng. Paper presented at the International Conference ‘Information Structure in Spoken Language Corpora (ISSLaC)’, Bielefeld, June 10–12, 2013. www.uni-bielefeld.de/lili/tagung/ISSLaC/files/Gueldemann_Witzlack_ISSLaC_handout.pdfGoogle Scholar

Haacke, Wilfrid H. G., 1999. The Tonology of Khoekhoe (Nama/Damara). Cologne: Köppe.Google Scholar

Haacke, Wilfrid H. G., 2013. Namibian Khoekhoe (Nama/Damara): Syntax. In Vossen, (ed.), pp. 325–240.Google Scholar

Haacke, Wilfrid H. G., 2014. Verb serialisation in northern dialects of Khoekhoegowab: convergence or divergence? In Güldemann, and Fehn, (eds), pp. 125–151.Google Scholar

Haacke, Wilfrid H. G. and Eiseb, Eliphas, 2002. A Khoekhoegowab Dictionary with an English–Khoekhoegowab Index. Windhoek: Gamsberg Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hagman, Roy S., 1977. Nama Hottentot Grammar. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Publications.Google Scholar

Hahn, Theophilus, 1881. Tsuni-ǁGoam: The Supreme Being of the Khoi-Khoi. London: Trübner.Google Scholar

Hajek, John, 2005. Vowel nasalization. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds), pp. 46–49.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin, et al. (eds), 2005. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd, 1976. A Typology of African Languages Based on the Order of Meaningful Elements. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd and König, Christa, 2013. Syntax: Northern Khoesan: !Xun. In Vossen, (ed.), pp. 293–325.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd and Nurse, Derek (eds), 2000. African Languages: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Herbert, Robert K., 1987. Articulatory modes and typological universals: The puzzle of Bantu ejectives and aspirates. In Shockey, L. and Channon, R. (eds), Festschrift for Ilse Lehiste, pp. 401–413. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Herbert, Robert K., 1990. The relative markedness of click sounds: Evidence from language change, acquisition, and avoidance. Anthropological Linguistics 32 (1/2): 120–138.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Carl F., 1953. Zur Verbreitung der Zahlwortstämme in Bantusprachen, Afrika und Übersee 37: 65–80.Google Scholar

Honken, Henry, 2006. Fused loans in Khoesan. Pula 20 (1): 75–85.Google Scholar

Honken, Henry, 2013. Eastern ǂHoan: Morphology. In Vossen, (ed.), pp. 249–261.Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M., 2003. Segmental phonology. In Nurse, and Philippson, (eds), pp. 42–58.Google Scholar

Kießling, Roland, 2014. Verbal serialisation in Taa (Southern Khoisan). In Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena and Ernszt, Martina (eds), Khoisan Languages and Linguistics: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium July 6–10, 2008, pp. 33–60. Riezlern/Kleinwalsertal. Cologne: Köppe.Google Scholar

Kilian-Hatz, Christa, 2001. Universality and diversity: Ideophones from Baka and Kxoe. In Voeltz, F. K. Erhard and Kilian-Hatz, Christa (eds), Ideophones, pp. 155–163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kilian-Hatz, Christa, 2008. A Grammar of Modern Khwe (Central Khoisan). Cologne: Köppe.Google Scholar

Kisseberth, Charles W. and Odden, David, 2003. Tone. In Nurse, and Philippson, (eds), pp. 59–70.Google Scholar

Köhler, Oswin, 1973/1974. Neuere Ergebnisse und Hypothesen der Sprachforschung in ihrer Bedeutung für die Geschichte Afrikas. Paideuma 19/20: 162–199.Google Scholar

Köhler, Oswin, 1975. Geschichte und Probleme der Gliederung der Sprachen Afrikas: Von den Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart. In Baumann, Hermann (ed.), Die Völker Afrikas und ihre Traditionellen Kulturen, part 1: Allgemeiner Teil und Südliches Afrika, pp. 135–373. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar

König, Christa, 2006. Focus in !Xun. In Ermisch, Sonja (ed.), Focus and Topic in African Languages, pp. 249–263. Cologne: Köppe.Google Scholar

König, Christa, 2010. Serial verb constructions in !Xun. In Brenzinger, and König, (eds), pp. 144–175.Google Scholar

König, Christa and Heine, Bernd, 2008. A Concise Dictionary of Northwestern ǃXun. Cologne: Köppe.Google Scholar

Krüger, Caspar J. H., 2006. Introduction to the Morphology of Setswana. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar

Lanham, Leonard W., 1962. The proliferation and extension of Bantu phonemic systems influenced by Bushman and Hottentot. In Lunt, Horace G. (ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguistics, Cambridge, Mass., August 27–31, 1962, pp. 382–391. Janua Linguarum, Series Maior 12. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Lionnet, Florian, 2014. Demonstrative and relative constructions in Ju: A diachronic account. In Güldemann, and Fehn, (eds), pp. 181–207.Google Scholar

Louw, Johan A., 1986. Some linguistic influence of Khoi and San in the prehistory of the Nguni. In Voßen, Rainer and Keuthmann, Klaus (eds), Contemporary Studies on Khoisan, vol. 2, pp. 141–168. Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung 5. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar

Luijks, Carla, 2001. The Khoekhoe and/or the San: Gathering the Afrikaans substrate languages. In Bell, and Washburn, (eds), pp. 184–199.Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian, 2003. The sounds of the Bantu languages. In Nurse, and Philippson, (eds), pp. 15–41.Google Scholar

Malchukov, Andrej L., Haspelmath, Martin and Comrie, Bernard 2010. Ditransitive constructions: A typological overview. In Malchukov, Andrej L., Haspelmath, Martin and Comrie, Bernard (eds), Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook, pp. 1–64. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Meinhof, Carl, 1905. Hottentottische Laute und Lehnworte im Kafir. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 58: 727–769, 59: 36–89.Google Scholar

Meinhof, Carl, 1930. Der Koranadialekt des Hottentottischen. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar

Mesthrie, Rajend and Roberge, Paul T. (eds), 2001/2002. Focus on Afrikaans Sociohistorical Linguistics, two volumes. Special issues of Journal of Germanic Linguistics 13 (4), 14 (1).Google Scholar

Miller, Amanda L., 2011. The representation of clicks. In van Oostendorp, Marc et al. (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, pp. 416–439. Oxford and Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Miller-Ockhuizen, Amanda L., 2001. Two kinds of reduplication in Juǀ’hoansi. Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere 66: 107–118.Google Scholar

Nakagawa, Hirosi, 2010. Phonotactics of disyllabic lexical morphemes in Gǀui. Working Papers in Corpus-based Linguistics and Language Education 5: 23–31. Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar

Nakagawa, Hirosi, 2011. A first report on Gǀui ideophones. In Hieda, Osamu, König, Christa and Nakagawa, Hirosi (eds), Geographical Typology and Linguistic Areas, With Special Reference to Africa, pp. 279–286. Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, Studies in Linguistics 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Nakagawa, Hirosi, 2012. The importance of TASTE verbs in some Khoe languages. Linguistics 50 (3): 395–420.Google Scholar

Nakagawa, Hirosi, 2014. The aspect system and posture verbs in Gǀui. Paper presented at the 5th International Symposium on Khoisan Languages and Linguistics, Riezlern, 14–16 July 2014.Google Scholar

Nichols, Johanna, 1992. Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Nienaber, Gabriël S., 1994. Pa-hulle is kreools [Pa-hulle is creole]. Khoekhoe en Afrikaans in gesprek [Khoekhoe and Afrikaans in Dialogue]. Suid-Afrikaanse Tydskrif vir Taalkunde, Supplement 21: 14–67.Google Scholar

Nurse, Derek and Philippson, Gérard (eds), 2003. The Bantu Languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ono, Hitomi, 2010. Personal pronouns. In Tanaka, Jiro and Sugawara, Kazuyoshi (eds), An Encyclopedia of ǀGui and ǁGana Culture and Society, pp. 91–92. Kyoto: Laboratory of Cultural Anthropology, Kyoto University.Google Scholar

Ono, Hitomi, 2014. Temporal expressions in Gǀui. Paper presented at the 5th International Symposium on Khoisan Languages and Linguistics, Riezlern, 14–16 July 2014.Google Scholar

Poulos, George (with Msimang, Christian T.), 1998. A Linguistic Analysis of Zulu. Cape Town: VIA Afrika.Google Scholar

Rapold, Christian, 2014. Areal and inherited aspects of compound verbs in Khoekhoe. In Güldemann, and Fehn, (eds), pp. 153–177.Google Scholar

Samarin, William J., 1971. Survey of Bantu ideophones. African Language Studies 12: 130–168.Google Scholar

Sands, Bonny E., 1998. Eastern and Southern African Khoisan: Evaluating Claims of Distant Linguistic Relationships. Cologne: Köppe.Google Scholar

Sands, Bonny E., 2001. Borrowing and diffusion as a source of lexical similarities in Khoesan. In Bell, and Washburn, (eds), pp. 200–224.Google Scholar

Snyman, Jan W., 1974. The Bushman and Hottentot languages of Southern Africa. Limi 2 (2): 28–44.Google Scholar

Snyman, Jan W., 1975. Žuǀ’hõasi Fonologie and Woordeboek [Žuǀ’hõasi Phonology and Dictionary]. Cape Town: Balkema.Google Scholar

Snyman, Jan W. (ed.), 1980. Bushman and Hottentot Linguistic Studies (Papers of Seminar Held on 27 July 1979). Pretoria: University of South Africa.Google Scholar

Snyman, Jan W., 2000. Palatalisation in the Tsowaa and Gǁana languages of central Botswana. In Batibo, and Tsonope, (eds), pp. 33–43.Google Scholar

Traill, Anthony, 1980. Phonetic diversity in the Khoisan languages. In Snyman, (ed.), pp. 167–189.Google Scholar

Traill, Anthony, 1985. Phonetic and Phonological Studies of ǃXóõ Bushman. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar

Traill, Anthony, 1986. Do the Khoi have a place in the San? New data on Khoisan linguistic relationships. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 7 (1): 407–430.Google Scholar

Traill, Anthony, 1994. A ǃXóõ Dictionary. Cologne: Köppe.Google Scholar

Traill, Anthony and Nakagawa, Hirosi, 2000. A historical !Xóõ-ǀGui contact zone: Linguistic and other relations. In Batibo, and Tsonope, (eds), pp. 1–17.Google Scholar

Viberg, Åke, 1984. The verbs of perception: A typological study. Linguistics 21 (1): 123–162.Google Scholar

Visser, Hessel, 2001. Naro Dictionary: Naro–English, English–Naro. D’Kar: Naro Language Project.Google Scholar

Visser, Hessel, 2010. Verbal compounds in Naro. In Brenzinger, and König, (eds), pp. 176–200.Google Scholar

Visser, Hessel, 2013. Naro: Morphology. In Vossen, (ed.), pp. 179–206.Google Scholar

Vossen, Rainer, 1997. Die Khoe-Sprachen: Ein Beitrag zur Erforschung der Sprachgeschichte Afrikas. Cologne: Köppe.Google Scholar

Vossen, Rainer (ed.), 2013. The Khoesan Languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

van Warmelo, Nicolaas Jacobus, 1989. Venda Dictionary: Tshivenda–English. Pretoria: J. L. van Schaik.Google Scholar

Westphal, Ernst O. J., 1971. The click languages of Southern and Eastern Africa. In Berry, Jack and Greenberg, Joseph H. (eds), Linguistics in Sub-Saharan Africa, pp. 367–420. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar

Westphal, Ernst O. J., 1980. The age of ‘Bushman’ languages in Southern African pre-history. In Snyman, (ed.), pp. 59–79.Google Scholar