Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T03:41:30.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A cognitive transition underlying both technological and social aspects of cumulative culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2020

Liane Gabora Open the ORCID record for Liane Gabora [Opens in a new window]  and
Cameron M. Smith
Liane Gabora
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Fipke Centre for Innovative Research, Kelowna, BCV1V 1V7, [email protected]://people.ok.ubc.ca/lgabora/
Cameron M. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Portland State University, Portland, OR97207. [email protected]://www.pdx.edu/anthropology/cameron-smith
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The argument that cumulative technological culture originates in technical-reasoning skills is not the only alternative to social accounts; another possibility is that accumulation of both technical-reasoning skills and enhanced social skills stemmed from the onset of a more basic cognitive ability such as recursive representational redescription. The paper confuses individual learning of pre-existing information with creative generation of new information.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 43 , 2020 , e163
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aerts, D. & Gabora, L. (2005a) A state-context-property model of concepts and their combinations I: The structure of the sets of contexts and properties. Kybernetes 34(1 & 2):167–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aerts, D. & Gabora, L. (2005b) A state-context-property model of concepts and their combinations II: A Hilbert space representation. Kybernetes 34(1 & 2):192–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aerts, D. & Sozzo, S. (2014) Quantum entanglement in concept combinations. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 53(10):3587–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, G. (1979) Mind and nature: A necessary unity, vol. 255. Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Bowers, K. S., Farvolden, P. & Mermigis, L. (1995) Intuitive antecedents of insight. The Creative Cognition Approach, 27–51.Google Scholar
Bruza, P. D., Kitto, K., Ramm, B., Sitbon, L., Song, D. & Blomberg, S. (2012) Quantum-like non-separability of concept combinations, emergent associates and abduction. Logic Journal of the IGPL 20(2):445–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2008) On phases. In: Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, eds. Freidlin, R., Otero, C. P. & Subizarreta, M. L., pp. 133–66.Google Scholar
Corballis, M. C. (2011) The recursive mind: The origins of human language, thought and civilization. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Donald, M. (1991) Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (2008) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. Basic Books.
Gabora, L. (1995) Meme and variations: A computer model of cultural evolution. In: 1993 Lectures in complex systems, eds. Nadel, L. & Stein, D., pp. 471–86. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Gabora, L. (2008) EVOC: A computer model of the evolution of culture. In: 30th Annual meeting of the cognitive science society, eds. Sloutsky, V., Love, B. & McRae, K., pp. 1466–71. Sheridan Publishing.Google Scholar
Gabora, L. (2018) The creative process of cultural evolution. In: Handbook of culture and creativity: Basic processes and applied innovations, ed. Leung, A., pp. 33–60. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gabora, L. (2019) Creativity: Linchpin in the quest for a viable theory of cultural evolution. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 27:77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabora, L. (2020) A complex systems framework for cultural evolution. In: 10th Volume of the annual series on advances in culture and psychology, eds. Gelfand, M., Chiu, C. & Hong, Y.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gabora, L., Leijnen, S., Veloz, T. & Lipo, C. (2011) A non-phylogenetic conceptual network architecture for organizing classes of material artifacts into cultural lineages. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting of the cognitive science society, eds. Carlson, L., Hőlscher, C. & Shipley, T. F., pp. 2923–28. Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Gabora, L. & Smith, C. (2018) Two cognitive transitions underlying the capacity for cultural evolution. Journal of Anthropological Sciences 96:27–52. doi: 10.4436/jass.96008.Google ScholarPubMed
Gabora, L. & Smith, C. (2019) Exploring the psychological basis for transitions in the archaeological record. In: Handbook of cognitive archaeology: A psychological framework, eds. Henley, T., Kardas, E. & Rossano, M., pp. 218–39. Routledge/Taylor & Francis. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429488818.Google Scholar
Gabora, L. & Steel, M. (2017) Autocatalytic networks in cognition and the origin of culture. Journal of Theoretical Biology 431:87–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gabora, L. & Steel, M. (under review) An autocatalytic network approach to cultural lineages: Modeling the cognitive transition from Oldowan to Acheulian tool technology.Google Scholar
Gabora, L. & Tseng, S. (2017) The social benefits of balancing creativity and imitation: Evidence from an agent-based model. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 11(4):403.Google Scholar
Hampton, J. (1987) Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions. Memory & Cognition 15:55–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, W. T. (2002) The faculty of language: What is it, who has it and how did it evolve? Science (New York, N.Y.) 298:1569–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mithen, S. (1996b) The prehistory of the mind: A search for the origins of art, religion and science. Phoenix.Google Scholar
Osherson, D. & Smith, E. (1981) On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts. Cognition 9:35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overmann, & Coolidge, , eds. (2019) Squeezing minds from stones: Cognitive archaeology and the evolution of the human mind. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penn, D. C., Holyoak, K. J. & Povinelli, D. J. (2008a) Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31(2):109–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penn, D. C., Holyoak, K. J. & Povinelli, D. J. (2008b) Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31(2):109–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scotney, V. S., Schwartz, J., Carbert, N., Saab, A. & Gabora, L. (2020) The form of a ‘half-baked’ creative idea: Empirical explorations into the structure of ill-defined mental representations. Acta Psychologica 203:102981.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, C., Gabora, L. & Gardner-O'Kearny, W. (2018) The extended evolutionary synthesis facilitates evolutionary models of culture change. Cliodynamics: The Journal of Quantitative History and Cultural Evolution 9(2):84–107.Google Scholar
Storms, G., De Boeck, P., Van Mechelen, I. & Ruts, W. (1998) Not guppies, nor goldfish, but tumble dryers, Noriega, Jesse Jackson, panties, car crashes, bird books, and Stevie Wonder. Memory & Cognition 26(1):143–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veloz, T., Temkin, I. & Gabora, L. (2012) A conceptual network-based approach to inferring the cultural evolutionary history of the Baltic psaltery. In: Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting of the cognitive science society, eds. Miyake, N., Peebles, D. & Cooper, R. P., pp. 2487–92. Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar