No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Chimpanzees' technical reasoning: Taking fieldwork and ontogeny seriously
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 August 2020
Abstract
Following the tradition of comparing humans with chimpanzees placed under unfavorable conditions, the authors suggest many uniquely human technological abilities. However, chimpanzees use spontaneously tools in nature to achieve many different goals demonstrating technological skills and reasoning contradicting the authors contrast. Chimpanzees and humans develop skills through the experiences faced during their upbringing and neglecting this leads to fake conclusions.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Bania, A., Harris, S., Kinsley, H. & Boysen, S. (2009) Constructive and deconstructive tool modification by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Animal Cognition 12:85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bard, K. & Leavens, D. (2014) The importance of development for comparative primatology. Annual Review of Anthropology 43:183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesch, C. (1991) Teaching among wild chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour 41:530–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesch, C. (2007) What makes us human (Homo sapiens)? The challenge of cognitive cross-species comparison. Journal of Comparative Psychology 121:227–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boesch, C. (2012) Wild cultures: A comparison between chimpanzee and human cultures. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesch, C. & Boesch, H. (1983) Optimization of nut-cracking with natural hammers by wild chimpanzees. Behaviour 83:265–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesch, C. & Boesch, H. (1984) Mental map in wild chimpanzees: An analysis of hammer transports for nut cracking. Primates 25:160–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesch, C. & Boesch, H. (1990) Tool use and tool making in wild chimpanzees. Folia Primatologica 54:86–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boesch, C., Bombjakova, D., Meier, A. & Mundry, R. (2019) Learning curves and teaching when acquiring nut-cracking in humans and chimpanzees. Scientific Reports 9:1515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boesch, C., Head, J. & Robbins, M. (2009) Complex toolsets for honey extraction among chimpanzees in Loango National Park, Gabon. Journal of Human Evolution 56:560–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, K., Grindstaff, J. & Pravosudov, V. (2013) Condition dependence, developmental plasticity, and cognition: Implications for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 28:290–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrne, R. (1997) The technical intelligence hypothesis: An additional evolutionary stimulus to intelligence? In: Machiavellian intelligence II: Extensions and evaluations, eds. Whiten, A. & Byrne, W., pp. 289–311. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, R. & Whiten, A. (1989) Machiavellian intelligence: Social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes and humans. Oxford Science Publishing.Google Scholar
Carpendale, J. & Lewis, C. (2004) Constructing an understanding of mind: The development of children's social understanding within social interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27:79–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clutton-Brock, T. & Harvey, P. (1980) Primates, brains and ecology. Journal of Zoology 190:309–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1992) Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates. Journal of Human Evolution 22(6):469–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estienne, V., Cohen, H., Wittig, R. & Boesch, C. (2019a) Maternal influence on the development of nut-cracking skills in the chimpanzees of the Taï forest, Côte d'Ivoire (Pan troglodytes verus). American Journal of Primatology, e23022. doi: 10.1002/ajp.2302.Google Scholar
Estienne, V., Robira, B., Mundry, R., Deschner, T. & Boesch, C. (2019b) Acquisition of a complex extractive technique by the immature chimpanzees of Loango National Park, Gabon. Animal Behaviour 147:61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fares, R., Belmeguenai, A., Sanchez, P., Kouchi, H., Bodennec, J., Morales, A., Georges, B., Bonnet, C., Bouvard, S., Sloviter, R. & Bezin, L. (2013) Standardized environmental enrichment supports enhanced brain plasticity in healthy rats and prevents cognitive impairment in epileptic rats. PLoS ONE 8:e53888.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furlong, E., Boose, K. & Boysen, S. (2008) Raking it in: The impact of enculturation on chimpanzee tool use. Animal Cognition 11:83–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodall, J. (1968) Behaviour of free-living chimpanzees of the Gombe Stream area. Animal Behaviour Monograph 1:163–311.Google Scholar
Goodall, J. (1970) Tool-using in primates and other vertebrates. In: Advances in the study of behavior, eds. Lehrmann, D. S., Hinde, R. A. & Shaw, E., vol. 3, pp. 195–249. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hackman, D. & Farah, M. (2009) Socioeconomic status and the developing brain. Trends in Cognitive Science 13:65–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hauser, M. (2001) Elementary my dear chimpanzee. Science (New York, N.Y.) 291:440–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, N. K. (1976) The social function of intellect. In: Growing points in ethology, eds. Bateson, P. P. and Hinde, R., pp. 303–317. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lambourne, K. & Tomporowski, P. (2010) The effect of exercise-induced arousal on cognitive task performance: A meta-regression analysis. Brain Research 1341:12–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leeuwen, E., Mulenga, I. & Chidester, D. (2014) Early social deprivation negatively affects social skill acquisition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Animal Cognition 17:407–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luncz, L., Mundry, R. & Boesch, C. (2012) Evidence for cultural differences between neighboring chimpanzee communities. Current Biology 22:922–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Middleton, L., Mitnitski, A., Fallah, N., Kirkland, S. & Rockwood, K. (2008) Changes in cognition and mortality in relation to exercise in late life: A population based study. PLoS ONE 3:e3124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Musgrave, S., Lonsdorf, E., Morgan, D., Prestipino, M., Bernstein-Kurtycz, L., Mundry, R. & Sanz, C. (2020) Teaching varies with task complexity in wild chimpanzees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117(2):969–76. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907476116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Musgrave, S., Morgan, D., Lonsdorf, E., Mundry, R. & Sanz, C. (2016) Tool transfers are a form of teaching among chimpanzees. Scientific Reports 6:34783. doi: 10.1038/srep34783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noble, K., Houston, S., Brito, N., Bartsch, H., Kan, E., Kuperman, J., Akshoomoff, N., Amaral, D., Bloss, C., Libiger, O., Schork, N., Murray, S., Casey, B., Chang, L., Ernst, T., Frazier, J., Gruen, J., Kennedy, D., Van Zijl, P., Mostofsky, S., Kaufmann, W., Kenet, T., Dale, A., Jernigan, T. & Sowell, E. (2015) Family income, parental education and brain structure in children and adolescents. Nature Neuroscience 18:773–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Normand, E., Ban, S. & Boesch, C. (2009) Forest chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) remember the location of numerous fruit trees. Animal Cognition 12:797–807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Normand, E. & Boesch, C. (2009) Sophisticated Euclidian maps in forest chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour 77:1195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, T., Ramsey, M. & Wilkinson, A. (2018) Environmentally induced changes to brain morphology predict cognitive performance. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 373:20170287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Povinelli, D. (2000) Folk physics for apes: The chimpanzee's theory of how the world works. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Povinelli, D. (2012) World without weight: Perspectives on an Alien mind. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. & Healy, S. (2014) Measuring variation in cognition. Behavioral Ecology 25:1287–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J., Lyn, H., Schaeffer, J. & Hopkins, W. (2011) The role of socio-communicative rearing environment in the development of social and physical cognition in apes. Developmental Science 14:1459–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sallet, J., Mars, R., Noonan, M., Andersson, J., O'Reilly, J., Jbabdi, S., Croxson, P., Jenkinson, M., Miller, K. & Rushworth, M. (2011) Social network size affects neural circuits in macaques. Science (New York, N.Y.) 334:697–700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salvanes, A., Moberg, O., Ebbesson, L. O. E., Nilsen, T., Jensen, K. & Braithwaite, V. (2013) Environmental enrichment promotes neural plasticity and cognitive ability in fish. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 280:20131331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanz, C. M., Call, J. & Morgan, D. (2009) Design complexity in termite-fishing tools of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Biology Letters 5:293–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanz, C. & Morgan, D. (2007) Chimpanzee tool technology in the Goualougo Triangle, Republic of Congo. Journal of Human Evolution 52:420–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanz, C. & Morgan, D. (2009) Flexible and persistent tool-using strategies in honey-gathering by wild chimpanzees. International Journal of Primatology 30:411–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanz, C., Morgan, D. & Gulick, S. (2004) New insights into chimpanzees, tools, and termites from the Congo Basin. American Naturalist 164:567–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Segall, M., Dasen, P., Berry, J. & Poortinga, Y. (1999) Human behavior in global perspective: An introduction to cross-cultural psychology, 2nd ed. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Sirianni, G., Mundry, R. & Boesch, C. (2015) When to choose which tool: Multidimensional and conditional selection of nut-cracking hammers in wild chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour 100:152–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirianni, G., Wittig, R. M., Gratton, P., Mundry, R., Schuler, A. & Boesch, C. (2018) Do chimpanzees anticipate an object's weight? A field experiment on the kinematics of hammer-lifting movements in the nut-cracking Taï chimpanzees. Animal Cognition 21:109–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smulders, T., Gould, K. & Leaver, L. (2010) Using ecology to guide the study of cognitive and neural mechanisms of different aspects of spatial memory in food-hoarding animals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365:883–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugiyama, Y. (1994) Tool use by wild chimpanzees. Science (New York, N.Y.) 367:327.Google ScholarPubMed
Sugiyama, Y. & Koman, J. (1979) Tool-using and -making behavior in wild chimpanzees at Bossou, Guinea. Primates 20:513–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, A. & Lukas, D. (2012) Individual variation in cognitive performance: Developmental and evolutionary perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367:2773–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. (2019b) On becoming human: A theory of ontogeny. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toyoshima, M., Yamada, K., Sugita, M. & Ichitani, Y. (2018) Social enrichment improves social recognition memory in male rats. Animal Cognition 21:345–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Target article
The elephant in the room: What matters cognitively in cumulative technological culture
Related commentaries (26)
A cognitive approach to cumulative technological culture is useful and necessary but only if it also applies to other species
A cognitive developmental approach is essential to understanding cumulative technological culture
A cognitive transition underlying both technological and social aspects of cumulative culture
A little too technical: The threat of intellectualising technical reasoning
A long view of cumulative technological culture
A theory limited in scope and evidence
Causal learning in CTC: Adaptive and collaborative
Chimpanzees' technical reasoning: Taking fieldwork and ontogeny seriously
How will we find the elephant in the room?
Human tool cognition relies on teleology
Implications for technological reserve development in advancing age, cognitive impairment, and dementia
Missing in action: Tool use is action based
New Caledonian crows afford invaluable comparative insights into human cumulative technological culture
Putting social cognitive mechanisms back into cumulative technological culture: Social interactions serve as a mechanism for children's early knowledge acquisition
Refining our understanding of the “elephant in the room”
Shared intentionality shapes humans' technical know-how
Supporting the weight of the elephant in the room: Technical intelligence propped up by social cognition and language
Taking into account the wider evolutionary context of cumulative cultural evolution
Technical reasoning alone does not take humans this far
The blind men and the elephant: What is missing cognitively in the study of cumulative technological evolution
The crow in the room: New Caledonian crows offer insight into the necessary and sufficient conditions for cumulative cultural evolution
The social side of innovation
The technical reasoning hypothesis does not rule out the potential key roles of imitation and working memory for CTC
Tools as “petrified memes”: A duality
What matters emotionally: The importance of pride for cumulative culture
Where does the elephant come from? The evolution of causal cognition is the key
Author response
The elephant in the China shop: When technical reasoning meets cumulative technological culture