Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T03:52:24.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A little too technical: The threat of intellectualising technical reasoning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2020

Ian Robertson*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia. [email protected]

Abstract

Osiurak and Reynaud (O&R) claim that research into the origin of cumulative technological culture has been too focused on social cognition and has consequently neglected the importance of uniquely human reasoning capacities. This commentary raises two interrelated theoretical concerns about O&R's notion of technical-reasoning capacities, and suggests how these concerns might be met.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowers, J. S. & Davis, C. J. (2012) Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin 138(3):389.10.1037/a0026450CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, A. (2013) Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36(3):181204.10.1017/S0140525X12000477CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colombetti, G. (2017) Enactive affectivity, extended. Topoi 36(3):445–55.10.1007/s11245-015-9335-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fridland, E. (2017) Skill and motor control: Intelligence all the way down. Philosophical Studies 174(6):1539–60.10.1007/s11098-016-0771-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friston, K. (2018) Does predictive coding have a future? Nature Neuroscience 21(8):1019–21.10.1038/s41593-018-0200-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirchhoff, M. D. & Robertson, I. (2018) Enactivism and predictive processing: A non-representational view. Philosophical Explorations 21(2):264–81.10.1080/13869795.2018.1477983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (2010) The cognitive niche: Coevolution of intelligence, sociality, and language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 107(Suppl. 2):8993–99.10.1073/pnas.0914630107CrossRefGoogle Scholar