Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:16:21.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Group? What group? A computational model of the group needs a psychology of “us” (not “them”)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2022

Janet Wiles Open the ORCID record for Janet Wiles [Opens in a new window] ,
S. Alexander Haslam Open the ORCID record for S. Alexander Haslam [Opens in a new window] ,
Niklas K. Steffens Open the ORCID record for Niklas K. Steffens [Opens in a new window]  and
Jolanda Jetten Open the ORCID record for Jolanda Jetten [Opens in a new window]
Janet Wiles
Affiliation:
School of ITEE, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia [email protected]://researchers.uq.edu.au/researcher/13
S. Alexander Haslam
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]://researchers.uq.edu.au/researcher/1946https://researchers.uq.edu.au/researcher/2864https://researchers.uq.edu.au/researcher/900
Niklas K. Steffens
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]://researchers.uq.edu.au/researcher/1946https://researchers.uq.edu.au/researcher/2864https://researchers.uq.edu.au/researcher/900
Jolanda Jetten
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]://researchers.uq.edu.au/researcher/1946https://researchers.uq.edu.au/researcher/2864https://researchers.uq.edu.au/researcher/900
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Groups are only real, and only serve as a basis for collective action, when their members perceive them to be real. For a computational model to have analytic fidelity and predictive validity it, therefore, needs to engage with the psychological reality of groups, their internal structure, and their structuring by (and of) the social context in which they function.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e125
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coser, L. A. (1956). The functions of social conflict. Routledge.Google Scholar
Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haslam, S. A. (2004). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. Sage.Google Scholar
Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In Tajfel, H. (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454–463. doi: 10.1177/0146167294205002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar