Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:43:51.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Signals and cues of social groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2022

Gregory A. Bryant Open the ORCID record for Gregory A. Bryant [Opens in a new window]  and
Constance M. Bainbridge Open the ORCID record for Constance M. Bainbridge [Opens in a new window]
Gregory A. Bryant
Affiliation:
Department of Communication, Center for Behavior, Evolution, and Culture, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, USA. [email protected]; http://gabryant.bol.ucla.edu/ [email protected]; http://constancebainbridge.com/
Constance M. Bainbridge
Affiliation:
Department of Communication, Center for Behavior, Evolution, and Culture, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, USA. [email protected]; http://gabryant.bol.ucla.edu/ [email protected]; http://constancebainbridge.com/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A crucial factor in how we perceive social groups involves the signals and cues emitted by them. Groups signal various properties of their constitution through coordinated behaviors across sensory modalities, influencing receivers' judgments of the group and subsequent interactions. We argue that group communication is a necessary component of a comprehensive computational theory of social groups.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e100
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bryant, G. A. (2013). Animal signals and emotion in music: Coordinating affect across groups. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 990, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryant, G. A. (2014). The evolution of coordinated vocalizations before language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(6), 549–550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryant, G. A., Fessler, D. M. T., Fusaroli, R., Clint, E., Aarøe, L., Apicella, C. L., … Zhou, Y. (2016). Detecting affiliation in colaughter across 24 societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(17), 4682–4687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryant, G. A., Wang, C. S., & Fusaroli, R. (2020). Recognizing affiliation in colaughter and cospeech. Royal Society Open Science, 7(10), 201092.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 74–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagen, E. H., & Bryant, G. A. (2003). Music and dance as a coalition signaling system. Human Nature, 14(1), 21–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagen, E. H., & Hammerstein, P. (2009). Did Neanderthals and other early humans sing? Seeking the biological roots of music in the territorial advertisements of primates, lions, hyenas, and wolves. Musicae Scientiae, 13(2_suppl), 291–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, F. H. (1989). Chorus howling by wolves: Acoustic structure, pack size and the Beau Geste effect, Bioacoustics, 2(2), 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, J. R. (1977). The significance of song repertoires: The Beau Geste hypothesis. Animal Behaviour, 25(2), 475–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, J., & Harper, D. (2003). Animal signals. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McElreath, R., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. (2003). Shared norms and the evolution of ethnic markers. Current Anthropology, 44(1), 122–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehr, S., Krasnow, M., Bryant, G. A., & Hagen, E. H. (2021). Origins of music in credible signaling. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 44, e60. doi:10.1017/S0140525X20000345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, P., Huang, M. X., & Bulling, A. (2018). Detecting low rapport during natural interactions in small groups from non-verbal behaviour. In The 23rd international conference on intelligent user interfaces (pp. 153–164). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3172944.3172969.Google Scholar
Phillips-Silver, J., Aktipis, A., & Bryant, G. A. (2010). The ecology of entrainment: Foundations of coordinated rhythmic movement. Music Perception, 28(1), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pietraszewski, D., & Schwartz, A. (2014a). Evidence that accent is a dimension of social categorization, not a byproduct of perceptual salience, familiarity, or ease-of-processing. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(1), 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietraszewski, D., & Schwartz, A. (2014b). Evidence that accent is a dedicated dimension of social categorization, not a byproduct of coalitional categorization. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(1), 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravignani, A., Bowling, D. L., & Fitch, W. (2014). Chorusing, synchrony, and the evolutionary functions of rhythm. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vascon, S., Mequanint, E. Z., Cristani, M., Hung, H., Pelillo, M., & Murino, V. (2014). A game-theoretic probabilistic approach for detecting conversational groups. In Asian conference on computer vision (pp. 658–675). Springer.Google Scholar
Vouloumanos, A., & Bryant, G. A. (2019). Five-month-old infants detect affiliation in colaughter. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Wang, Q., Chen, M., Nie, F., & Li, X. (2018). Detecting coherent groups in crowd scenes by multiview clustering. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 42(1), 46–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed