Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:06:03.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interacting with others while reacting to the environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2022

Ilan Fischer Open the ORCID record for Ilan Fischer [Opens in a new window] ,
Simon A. Levin Open the ORCID record for Simon A. Levin [Opens in a new window] ,
Daniel I. Rubenstein Open the ORCID record for Daniel I. Rubenstein [Opens in a new window] ,
Shacked Avrashi ,
Lior Givon  and
Tomer Oz
Ilan Fischer
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel Haifa 3498838 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
Simon A. Levin
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544-2016, USA [email protected] [email protected]
Daniel I. Rubenstein
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544-2016, USA [email protected] [email protected]
Shacked Avrashi
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel Haifa 3498838 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
Lior Givon
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel Haifa 3498838 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
Tomer Oz
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel Haifa 3498838 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Here, we revise Pietraszewski's model of groups by assigning participant pairs with two triplets, denoting: (1) the type of game that models the interaction, (2) its critical switching point between alternatives (i.e., the game's similarity threshold), and (3) the perception of strategic similarity with the opponent. These triplets provide a set of primitives that accounts for individuals' strategic motivations and observed behaviors.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e106
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Axelrod, R. M. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fischer, I. (2009). Friend or foe: Subjective expected relative similarity as a determinant of cooperation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, I. (2012). Similarity or reciprocity? On the determinants of cooperation in similarity-sensitive games. Psychological Inquiry, 23(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.658004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, I., Frid, A., Goerg, S. J., Levin, S. A., Rubenstein, D. I., & Selten, R. (2013). Fusing enacted and expected mimicry generates a winning strategy that promotes the evolution of cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 110, 10229–10233. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308221110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flood, M., & Dresher, M. (1952). Some experimental games. Research memorandum RM-789. Rand.Google Scholar
McIntosh, H. V. (2010). Conway's Life. In Adamatzky, A. (Ed.), Game of life cellular automata (pp. 17–33). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-217-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, A. (1960). Fights, games, and debates. In Fights, games, and debates. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9022.Google Scholar
Rapoport, A., & Chammah, A. M. (1965). Prisoner's dilemma: A study in conflict and cooperation. University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, A., & Chammah, A. M. (1966). The game of chicken. American Behavioral Scientist, 10(3), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276426601000303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, A., & Guyer, M. (1966). A taxonomy of 2 × 2 games. General Systems, 11, 203–214.Google Scholar
von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (2007). Theory of games and economic behavior (60th Anniversary Commemorative Edition, Vol. 9781400829). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400829460.Google Scholar