Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:51:14.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Socializing willpower: Resolve from the outside in

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2021

Stephen Setman Open the ORCID record for Stephen Setman [Opens in a new window]  and
Daniel Kelly Open the ORCID record for Daniel Kelly [Opens in a new window]
Stephen Setman
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN47906-2098. [email protected]; [email protected]://setman.carrd.co/, http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~drkelly/
Daniel Kelly
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN47906-2098. [email protected]; [email protected]://setman.carrd.co/, http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~drkelly/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ainslie's account of willpower is conspicuously individualistic. Because other people, social influence, and culture appear only peripherally, it risks overlooking what may be resolve's deeply social roots. We identify a general “outside-in” explanatory strategy suggested by a range of recent research into human cognitive evolution, and suggest how it might illuminate the origins and more social aspects of resolve.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 44 , 2021 , e53
Check for updates
Creative Commons
The target article and response article are works of the U.S. Government and are not subject to copyright protection in the United States.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carr, D.T. (2021). Personal identity is social identity. Phenomenology and The Cognitive Sciences, 20, 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09702-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, P. (2009). How we know our own minds: The relationship between mindreading and metacognition. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(2), 121–138, discussion 138-82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carruthers, P. (2011). The opacity of the mind: An integrative theory of self-knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chudek, M., & Henrich, J. (2011). Culture–gene coevolution, norm-psychology and the emergence of human prosociality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 218–226.Google ScholarPubMed
Clark, A. (2007). Soft selves and ecological control. In Spurrett, D., Ross, D., Kincaid, H. & Stephens, L. (Eds.), Distributed cognition and the will. (pp. 101–121), Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Donald, M. (2007). The slow process: A hypothetical cognitive adaptation for distributed cognitive networks. Journal of Physiology – Paris, 101, 214–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doris, J. (2015). Talking to our selves: Reflection, ignorance, and agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frith, C., & Frith, U. (2006). How we predict what other people are going to do. Brain Research, 1079, 36–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haslanger, S. (2000). Gender and race: (what) are they? (what) do we want them to be? Noûs, 34, 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J. (2015). The secret of our success: How culture is driving human evolution, domesticating our species, and making us smarter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C. (2018). Cognitive gadgets: The cultural evolution of thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoehl, S., Keupp, S., Schleihauf, H., McGuigan, N., Buttelmann, D., & Whiten, A. (2019). “Over-imitation”: A review and appraisal of a decade of research. Developmental Review, 51, 90–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holroyd, J., & Kelly, D. (2016). Implicit bias, character, and control. In Masala, A. & Webber, J. (Eds.), From personality to virtue: Essays in the philosophy of character (pp. 106–133). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198746812.003.0006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, D. (forthcoming). Two ways to adopt a norm: The (moral?) psychology of avowal and internalization. In Vargas, M. & Doris, J. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of moral Psychology.Google Scholar
Kelly, D., & Hoburg, P. (2017). A tale of two processes: On Joseph Henrich's the secret of our success: How culture is driving human evolution, domesticating our species, and making us smarter. Philosophical Psychology, 30(6), 832–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, D., & Setman, S. (2020). The psychology of normative cognition. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition). URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/psychology-normative-cognition/.Google Scholar
Laland, K. (2017). Darwin's unfinished symphony: How culture made the human mind. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindemann, H. (2014). Holding and letting go: The social practice of personal identities. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathew, S., & Perreault, C. (2015). Behavioural variation in 172 small-scale societies indicates that social learning is the main mode of human adaptation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282, 20150061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAdams, D. (2018). “First we invented stories, then they changed us”: The evolution of narrative identity. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, 3(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, D., & McLean, K. (2013). Narrative identity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(3), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413475622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGeer, V., & Pettit, P. (2002). The self-regulating mind. Language & Communication, 22, 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, K. C., Pasupathi, M., & Pals, J. (2007). Selves creating stories creating selves: A process model of self-development. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(3), 262–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307301034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 57–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2017). The enigma of reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peters, U. (2020). What is the function of confirmation bias? Erkenntnis, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-020-00252-1.Google Scholar
Richerson, P., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Santos, M. D., Rankin, D., & Wedekind, C. (2011). The evolution of punishment through reputation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 371–377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shea, N., Boldt, A., Bang, D., Yeung, N., Heyes, C., & Frith, C. (2014). Supra-personal cognitive control and metacognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 186–193.Google ScholarPubMed
Sterelny, K. (2012). The evolved apprentice: How evolution made humans unique. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterelny, K. (2018). Why reason? Hugo Mercier's and Dan Sperber's The Enigma of Reason: A New Theory of Human Understanding. Mind & Language, 33(5), 502–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoljar, N. (2015). Feminist perspectives on autonomy. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2015 Edition). URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/feminism-autonomy/.Google Scholar
Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. (2007). The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(3), 299–313; discussion 313–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witt, C. (2011). The metaphysics of gender. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J., Balliet, D., Peperkoorn, L. S., Romano, A., & Lange, P. A. (2019). Cooperation in groups of different sizes: The effects of punishment and reputation-based partner choice. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed