Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:37:31.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A crisis of generalizability or a crisis of constructs?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2022

Kevin M. King Open the ORCID record for Kevin M. King [Opens in a new window]  and
Aidan G.C. Wright Open the ORCID record for Aidan G.C. Wright [Opens in a new window]
Kevin M. King
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA98195, [email protected]://faculty.washington.edu/kingkm
Aidan G.C. Wright
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA15260, [email protected]://www.personalityprocesses.com/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Psychologists wish to identify and study the mechanisms and implications of nomothetic constructs that reveal truths about human nature and span across operationalizations. To achieve this goal, psychologists should spend more time carefully describing and measuring constructs across a wide range of methods and measures, and less time rushing to explain and predict.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e24
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Credé, M., Tynan, M. C., & Harms, P. D. (2017). Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(3), 492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L., Alberts, H., Anggono, C. O., Batailler, C., Birt, A. R., … Zwienenberg, M. (2016). A multilab preregistered replication of the ego-depletion effect. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(4), 546–573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagger, M. S., Wood, C., Stiff, C., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2010). Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 495–525. doi: 10.1037/a0019486CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Insel, T. R. (2014). The NIMH research domain criteria (RDoC) project: Precision medicine for psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry, 171(4), 395–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jewsbury, P. A., Bowden, S. C., & Strauss, M. E. (2016). Integrating the switching, inhibition, and updating model of executive function with the Cattell–Horn–Carroll model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(2), 220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitely, S. E. (1983). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93(1), 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelazo, P. D., Anderson, J. E., Richler, J., Wallner-Allen, K., Beaumont, J. L., & Weintraub, S. (2013). II. NIH toolbox cognition battery (CB): Measuring executive function and attention. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 78(4), 16–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar