Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-2jptb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-16T18:55:47.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Conviction Narrative Theory a theory of everything or nothing?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2023

Ben R. Newell Open the ORCID record for Ben R. Newell [Opens in a new window]  and
Aba Szollosi
Ben R. Newell
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia [email protected] http://www2.psy.unsw.edu.au/Users/BNewell/
Aba Szollosi
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK.  [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We connect Conviction Narrative Theory to an account that views people as intuitive scientists who can flexibly create, evaluate, and modify representations of decision problems. We argue that without understanding how the relevant complex narratives (or indeed any representation, simple to complex) are themselves constructed, we also cannot know when and why people would rely on them to make choices.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e103
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carey, S., & Barner, D. (2019) Ontogenetic origins of human integer representations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23, 823–835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klayman, J. (2001). Ambivalence in (not about) naturalistic decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14, 372–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, A., Szollosi, A., & Newell, B. R. (2022). Learning the lie of the land: How people construct mental representations of distributions. Preprint. Available at https://psyarxiv.com/rdhv8/Google Scholar
Newell, B. R., Lagnado, D. A., & Shanks, D. R. (2022). Straight choices: The psychology of decision making (3rd ed.). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szollosi, A., Donkin, C., & Newell, B. R. (2022). Toward nonprobabilistic explanations of learning and decision-making. Psychological Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000355Google ScholarPubMed
Szollosi, A., & Newell, B. R. (2020). People as intuitive scientists: Reconsidering statistical explanations of decision making. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(12), 1008–1018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Neumann, J., & Morgernstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behaviour (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.Google Scholar