Article contents
The elephant in the China shop: When technical reasoning meets cumulative technological culture
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 August 2020
Abstract
The commentaries have both revealed the implications of and challenged our approach. In this response, we reply to these concerns, discuss why the technical-reasoning hypothesis does not minimize the role of social-learning mechanisms – nor assume that technical-reasoning skills make individuals omniscient technically – and make suggestions for overcoming the classical opposition between the cultural versus cognitive niche hypothesis of cumulative technological culture.
- Type
- Authors' Response
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Barrouillet, P., Portrat, S. & Camos, V. (2011) On the law relating processing to storage in working memory. Psychological Review 118:175–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumard, J., Lesourd, M., Jarry, C., Merck, C., Etcharry-Bouyx, F., Chauviré, V., Belliard, S., Moreaud, O., Croisile, B., Osiurak, F. & Le Gall, D. (2016) Tool use disorders in neurodegenerative diseases: Roles of semantic memory and technical reasoning. Cortex 82:119–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, S. R., Apperly, I. A., Chappell, J., Guthrie, C. & Cutting, N. (2011) Making tools isn't child's play. Cognition 119(2):301–306. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyd, R., Richerson, P. J. & Henrich, J. (2011) The cultural niche: Why social learning is essential for human adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108(Suppl. 2):10918–25. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100290108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chudek, M. & Henrich, J. (2011) Culture-gene coevolution, norm-psychology and the emergence of human prosociality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15:218–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Csibra, G. & Gergely, G. (2009) Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13:148–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cutting, N., Apperly, I. A. & Beck, S. R. (2011) Why do children lack the flexibility to innovate tools? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 109:497–511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Oliveira, E., Reynaud, E. & Osiurak, F. (2019) Roles of technical reasoning, theory of mind, creativity, and fluid cognition in cumulative technological culture. Human Nature 30:326–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derex, M., Bonnefon, J. F., Boyd, R. & Mesoudi, A. (2019) Causal understanding is not necessary for the improvement of culturally evolving technology. Nature Human Behaviour 3:446–52. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0567-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duval, C., Bejanin, A., Piolino, P., Laisney, M., de la Sayette, V., Belliard, S., Eustache, F. & Desgranges, B. (2012) Theory of mind impairments in patients with semantic dementia. Brain 135:228–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gruber, T., Muller, M. N., Strimling, P., Wrangham, R. W. & Zuberbühler, K. (2009) Wild chimpanzees rely on cultural knowledge to solve an experimental honey acquisition task. Current Biology 19:1806–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyes, C. (2018) Enquire within: Cultural evolution and cognitive science. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 373:20170051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodges, J. R., Bozeat, S., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Patterson, K. & Spatt, J. (2000) The role of knowledge in object use: Evidence from semantic dementia. Brain 123:1913–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horner, V., Whiten, A., Flynn, E. & de Waal, F. B. M. (2006) Faithful replication of foraging techniques along cultural transmission chains by chimpanzees and children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103:13878–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irish, M., Hodges, J. R. & Piguet, O. (2014) Right anterior lobe dysfunction underlies theory of mind impairments in semantic dementia. Brain 137:1241–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jelbert, S. A., Hosking, R. J., Taylor, A. H. & Gray, R. D. (2018) Mental template matching is a potential cultural transmission mechanism for New Caledonian crow tool manufacturing traditions. Scientific Reports 8:8956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J. & Myles, S. (2010) How culture shaped the human genome: Bringing genetics and the human sciences together. Nature Reviews Genetics 11:137–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lesourd, M., Baumard, J., Jarry, C., Etcharry-Bouyx, F., Belliard, S., Moreaud, O., Croisile, B., Chauviré, V., Granjon, M., Le Gall, D. & Osiurak, F. (2016) Mechanical problem-solving strategies in Alzheimer's disease and semantic dementia. Neuropsychology 30:612–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Logan, C. J., Breen, A. J., Taylor, A. H., Gray, R. D. & Hoppitt, W. J. S. E. (2016) How New Caledonian crows solve novel foraging problems and what it means for cumulative culture. Learning & Behavior 44(1):18–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mesoudi, A. (2011) Variable cultural acquisition costs constrain cumulative cultural evolution. PLoS One 6:e18239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moll, H. (2018) The transformative cultural intelligence hypothesis: Evidence from young children's problem-solving. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 9(1):161–75. doi: 10.1007/s13164-017-0342-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, M. (2013) Young children's imitative and innovative behaviour on the floating object task. Infant and Child Development 22(6):44–52. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.1765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osiurak, F. (2014) What neuropsychology tells us about human tool use? The four constraints theory (4CT): Mechanics, space, time and effort. Neuropsychology Review 24:88–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osiurak, F. (2017) Cognitive paleoanthropology and technology: Toward a parsimonious theory (PATH). Review of General Psychology 21:292–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osiurak, F., Aubin, G., Allain, P., Jarry, C., Richard, I. & Le Gall, D. (2008) Object utilization versus object usage: A single-case study. Neurocase 14:169–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osiurak, F. & Badets, A. (2016) Tool use and affordance: Manipulation-based versus reasoning-based approaches. Psychological Review 123:534–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osiurak, F., Cretel, C., Duhau-Marmon, N., Fournier, I., Marignier, L., De Oliveira, E., Navarro, J. & Reynaud, E. (in press) The pedagogue, the engineer, and the friend: From whom do we learn? Human Nature.Google Scholar
Osiurak, F., De Oliveira, E., Navarro, J., Lesourd, M., Claidière, N. & Reynaud, E. (2016) Physical intelligence does matter to cumulative technological culture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 145(8):941–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osiurak, F., De Oliveira, E., Navarro, J. & Reynaud, E. (2020a) The castaway island: Distinct roles of theory of mind and technical reasoning in cumulative technological culture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 149(1):58–66. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osiurak, F. & Heinke, D. (2018) Looking for Intoolligence: A unified framework for the cognitive study of human tool use and technology. American Psychologist 73:169–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osiurak, F., Jarry, C. & Le Gall, D. (2010) Grasping the affordances, understanding the reasoning: Toward a dialectical theory of human tool use. Psychological Review 117:517–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osiurak, F., Lesourd, M., Navarro, J. & Reynaud, E. (2020b) Technition: When tools come out of the closet. Perspectives on Psychological Science 15:880–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osiurak, F. & Rossetti, Y. (2017) Definition: Limb apraxia. Cortex 93:228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osiurak, F., Rossetti, Y. & Badets, A. (2017) What is an affordance? 40 years later. Neuroscience & BioBehavioral Reviews 77:403–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plancher, G. & Barrouillet, P. (2020) On some of the main criticisms of the modal model: Reappraisal from a TBRS perspective. Memory & Cognition 48:455–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quesque, F. & Rossetti, Y. (2020) What do theory-of-mind tasks actually measure? Theory and practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science 15:384–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynaud, E., Navarro, J., Lesourd, M. & Osiurak, F. (2019) To watch is to work: A critical review of neuroimaging data on Tool-use Observation Network (ToON). Neuropsychology Review 29:484–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silveri, M. C. & Ciccarelli, N. (2009) Semantic memory in object use. Neuropsychologia 47:2634–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonton, D. K. (2000) Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist 55:151–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sirigu, A., Duhamel, J. R. & Poncet, M. (1991) The role of sensorimotor experience in object recognition. Brain 114:2555–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spunt, R. P. & Lieberman, M. D. (2012) Dissociating modality-specific and supramodel neural systems for action understanding. The Journal of Neuroscience 32:3575–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tennie, C., Call, J. & Tomasello, M. (2010) Evidence for emulation in chimpanzees in social settings using the floating peanut task. PLoS One 5:e10544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toth, N. (1985) The Oldowan reassessed: A close look at early stone artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Science 12:101–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaesen, K. (2012) The cognitive bases of human tool use. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35:203–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Overwalle, F. & Baetens, K. (2009) Understanding others’ actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: A meta-analysis. NeuroImage 48:564–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Schaik, C. P., Deaner, R. O. & Merrill, M. Y. (1999) The conditions for tool use in primates: Implications for the evolution of material culture. Journal of Human Evolution 36:719–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wynn, T. & Coolidge, F. L. (2014) Technical cognition, working memory and creativity. Pragmatics & Cognition 22:45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6
- Cited by
Target article
The elephant in the room: What matters cognitively in cumulative technological culture
Related commentaries (26)
A cognitive approach to cumulative technological culture is useful and necessary but only if it also applies to other species
A cognitive developmental approach is essential to understanding cumulative technological culture
A cognitive transition underlying both technological and social aspects of cumulative culture
A little too technical: The threat of intellectualising technical reasoning
A long view of cumulative technological culture
A theory limited in scope and evidence
Causal learning in CTC: Adaptive and collaborative
Chimpanzees' technical reasoning: Taking fieldwork and ontogeny seriously
How will we find the elephant in the room?
Human tool cognition relies on teleology
Implications for technological reserve development in advancing age, cognitive impairment, and dementia
Missing in action: Tool use is action based
New Caledonian crows afford invaluable comparative insights into human cumulative technological culture
Putting social cognitive mechanisms back into cumulative technological culture: Social interactions serve as a mechanism for children's early knowledge acquisition
Refining our understanding of the “elephant in the room”
Shared intentionality shapes humans' technical know-how
Supporting the weight of the elephant in the room: Technical intelligence propped up by social cognition and language
Taking into account the wider evolutionary context of cumulative cultural evolution
Technical reasoning alone does not take humans this far
The blind men and the elephant: What is missing cognitively in the study of cumulative technological evolution
The crow in the room: New Caledonian crows offer insight into the necessary and sufficient conditions for cumulative cultural evolution
The social side of innovation
The technical reasoning hypothesis does not rule out the potential key roles of imitation and working memory for CTC
Tools as “petrified memes”: A duality
What matters emotionally: The importance of pride for cumulative culture
Where does the elephant come from? The evolution of causal cognition is the key
Author response
The elephant in the China shop: When technical reasoning meets cumulative technological culture