Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T17:25:01.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lessons from behaviorism: The problem of construct-led science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2022

Thomas E. Dickins Open the ORCID record for Thomas E. Dickins [Opens in a new window]  and
Qazi Rahman Open the ORCID record for Qazi Rahman [Opens in a new window]
Thomas E. Dickins
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Middlesex University, LondonNW4 4BT, UK. [email protected]; http://tomdickins.net/
Qazi Rahman
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Kings College London, Guy's Hospital, LondonSE1 9RT, UK. [email protected]; https://www.kcl.ac.uk/people/qazi-rahman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Yarkoni makes a number of valid points in his critical analysis of psychology, but he misses an opportunity to expose the root of its problems. That root is the poor practice around the derivation of explanatory constructs. We make comment on this with an example from behaviorist history and relate this to the recent discussion of scientific understanding in the philosophy of science.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e12
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bechtel, W., & Bich, L. (2021). Grounding cognition: Heterarchical control mechanisms in biology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 376(1820), 20190751. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curry, O. S., Mullins, D. A., & Whitehouse, H. (2019). Is it good to cooperate? Testing the theory of morality-as-cooperation in 60 societies. Current Anthropology, 60(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1086/701478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Regt, H. W. (2017). Understanding scientific understanding. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickins, T. E. (2003). What can evolutionary psychology tell us about cognitive architecture? History and Philosophy of Psychology, 5(1), 1–16. http://dspace.uel.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10552/566.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Harris, R. J. (1976). The uncertain connection between verbal theories and research hypotheses in social psychology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12(2), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(76)90071-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, L. A., & Bull, J. J. (2002). Fighting change with change: Adaptive variation in an uncertain world. TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution, 17(12), 551–557. http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2851914%5Cnpapers://994295af-42ed-47fe-9a2a-07e2e7d6a6b8/Paper/p709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, J. (2013). Three views of behaviorism. Psychological Record, 63(3), 681–692. https://doi.org/10.11133/j.tpr.2013.63.3.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G. A. (2006). Behavioural ecology: Natural history as science. In Lucas, J. & Simmons, L. (Eds.), Essays in animal behaviour (pp. 23–56). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1945). The open society and its enemies. Routledge.Google Scholar
Potochnik, A. (2020). Idealization and many aims. Philosophy of Science, 87(5), 933–943. https://doi.org/10.1086/710622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1945). Analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52, 270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2021). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 717–724. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966796.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed