Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:00:33.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cultural evolution and prosociality: Widening the hypothesis space

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2016

Bryce Huebner
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057. [email protected]://explore.georgetown.edu/people/lbh24/
Hagop Sarkissian
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, The City University of New York, Baruch College, New York, NY 10010. [email protected]://www.baruch.cuny.edu/wsas/academics/philosophy/hsarkissian.htm

Abstract

Norenzayan et al. suggest that Big Gods can be replaced by Big Governments. We examine forms of social and self-monitoring and ritual practice that emerged in Classical China, heterarchical societies like those that emerged in pre-Columbian Mesoamerica, and the contemporary Zapatista movement of Chiapas, and we recommend widening the hypothesis space to include these alternative forms of social organization.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carpenter, A. (2012) Faith without God in Nagarjuna. In: Thomism and Asian cultures, ed. Co, A. P.. & Bolaños, P. A., pp. 317–81. University of Santo Tomas Publishing House.Google Scholar
Froese, T., Gershenson, C. & Manzanilla, L. R. (2014) Can government be self-organized? A mathematical model of the collective social organization of ancient Teotihuacan, Central Mexico. PLOS ONE 9(10):e109966.Google Scholar
Heine, S. J., Takemoto, T., Moskalenko, S., Lasaleta, J. & Henrich, J. (2008) Mirrors in the head: Cultural variation in objective self-awareness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34:879–87. doi: 10.1177/0146167208316921.Google Scholar
Manzanilla, L. R. (2012) Neighborhoods and elite “Houses” at Teotihuacan, Central Mexico. In: The neighborhood as a social and spatial unit in Mesoamerican cities, ed. Arnauld, M. C., Manzanilla, L. R., and Smith, M. E., pp. 5573. University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Munson, J., Amati, V., Collard, M. & Macri, M. J. (2014) Classic Maya bloodletting and the cultural evolution of religious rituals: Quantifying patterns of variation in hieroglyphic texts. PLOS ONE 9.9( 2014):e107982.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E. (2003) The geography of thought. The Free Press.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I. & Norenzayan, A. (2001) Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review 108:291310. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the commons. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Potter, D. R. & King, E. M. (2008) A heterarchical approach to lowland Maya socioeconomies. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 6.1(1995):1732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston-Roedder, R. (2013) Faith in humanity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87(3):664–87.Google Scholar
Puett, M. (2013) Critical approaches to religion in China. Critical Research on Religion 1(1):95101. doi:10.1177/2050303213476115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkissian, H. (2010) Minor tweaks, major payoffs: The problems and promise of situationism in moral philosophy. Philosopher's Imprint 10(9):115.Google Scholar
Sarkissian, H. (2014) Is self-regulation a burden or a virtue? A comparative perspective. In: The philosophy and psychology of virtue: An empirical approach to character and happiness, ed. Snow, N. & Trivigno, F., pp. 181–96. Routledge.Google Scholar
Sarkissian, H. (2015) Supernatural, social, and self-monitoring in the scaling-up of Chinese civilization. Religion, Brain and Behavior 5:323–27.Google Scholar
Starr, A., Martínez-Torres, M. E. & Rosset, P. (2011) Participatory democracy in action practices of the Zapatistas and the Movimento Sem Terra. Latin American Perspectives 38(1):102–19.Google Scholar