No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Credibility, credulity, and redistribution
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 March 2016
Abstract
After raising some doubts for cultural group selection as an explanation of prosocial religiosity, we propose an alternative that views it as a “greenbeard effect.” We combine the dynamic constraints on the evolution of greenbeard effects with Iannaccone's (1994) account of strict sects. Our model shows that certain social conditions may foster credulity and prosociality.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016
References
André, J.-B. & Morin, O. (2011) Questioning the cultural evolution of altruism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology
24(12):2531–42.Google Scholar
Baumard, N. (2010) Comment nous sommes devenus moraux. Une histoire naturelle du bien et du mal [How we became moral: A natural history of good and evil]. Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Diamond, J. M. (1997b) Guns, germs and steel: A short history of everybody for the last 13,000 years. Norton.Google Scholar
Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. (2005) Altruists with green beards. Analyse & Kritik
27(1):73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J. (2009) The evolution of costly displays, cooperation and religion: Credibility enhancing displays and their implications for cultural evolution. Evolution and Human Behavior
30:244–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iannaccone, L. R. (1994) Why strict churches are strong. American Journal of Sociology
99: 1180–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R. & Welzel, C. (2005) Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McElreath, R., Richerson, P. & Boyd, R. (2003) Shared norms and the evolution of ethnic markers. Current Anthropology
44(1):122–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesse, R. M. (2009) Social selection and the origins of culture. In: Evolution, culture, and the human mind, ed. Schaller, M., Heine, S. J., Norenzayan, A., Yamagishi, T. & Kameda, T., pp. 137–50. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Noë, R. & Hammerstein, P. (1994) Biological markets: Supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
35(1):1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, P. & Inglehart, R. (2011) Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide, second edition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Soltis, J., Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. (1995) Can group-functional behaviors evolve by cultural group selection? An empirical test. Current Anthropology
36(3):473–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viciana, H. (2014) Le concept éthologique de culture. Aux origines de l'influence sociale [The ethological concept of culture. Origins of social influence]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Université deParis 1- Panthéon-Sorbonne, Paris.Google Scholar
Target article
The cultural evolution of prosocial religions
Related commentaries (27)
A developmental perspective on the cultural evolution of prosocial religious beliefs
Are gods and good governments culturally and psychologically interchangeable?
Authoritarian and benevolent god representations and the two sides of prosociality
Awe: A direct pathway from extravagant displays to prosociality
Big Gods: Extended prosociality or group binding?
Clarity and causality needed in claims about Big Gods
Coerced coordination, not cooperation
Credibility, credulity, and redistribution
Cultural evolution and prosociality: Widening the hypothesis space
Divorcing the puzzles: When group identities foster in-group cooperation
Even “Bigger Gods” developed amongst the pastoralist followers of Moses and Mohammed: Consistent with uncertainty and disadvantage, but not prosocality
Explaining the success of karmic religions
Hell of a theory
Let us be careful with the evidence on mentalizing, cognitive biases, and religious beliefs
Memes and the evolution of religion: We need memetics, too
Mind God's mind: History, development, and teaching1
Monotheism versus an innate bias towards mentalizing
Moralizing gods revisited
Moralizing religions: Prosocial or a privilege of wealth?
Projecting WEIRD features on ancient religions
Prosociality and religion: History and experimentation
Recognizing religion's dark side: Religious ritual increases antisociality and hinders self-control
Religion promotes a love for thy neighbour: But how big is the neighbourhood?
Self-control, cultural animals, and Big Gods
The functions of ritual in social groups
The prosocial benefits of seeing purpose in life events: A case of cultural selection in action?
Why would anyone want to believe in Big Gods?
Author response
Parochial prosocial religions: Historical and contemporary evidence for a cultural evolutionary process