Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:29:26.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competition elicits arousal and affect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2017

R. Hans Phaf
R. Hans Phaf*
Affiliation:
Amsterdam Brain and Cognition Center and the Brain and Cognition Group at the Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 XA Amsterdam, The [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The emotion–cognition integration in Mather et al. can be extended by specifying the relationship between competition and arousal in the reverse direction. According to affective monitoring, competition raises arousal, which, when sustained, results in negative affect, evoking theta oscillations, and when resolved, in positive affect, evoking gamma oscillations. Competition should be considered a core process in both cognition and emotion.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e220
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bauer, F., Cheadle, S. W., Parton, A., Müller, H. J. & Usher, M. (2009) Gamma flicker triggers attentional selection without awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106:1666–71.Google Scholar
Desimone, R. & Duncan, J. (1995) Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience 18:193–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dreisbach, G. & Fischer, R. (2012) Conflicts as aversive signals. Brain and Cognition 78:94–98.Google Scholar
Duncan, J. (1996) Cooperating brain systems in selective perception and action. In: Attention and Performance XVI, ed. Inui, T. & McClelland, J. L., pp. 549–78. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fazendeiro, T., Chenier, T. & Winkielman, P. (2007) How dynamics of thinking create affective and cognitive feelings: Psychology and neuroscience of the connection between fluency, liking, and memory. In: Social neuroscience, ed. Harmon-Jones, E. & Winkielman, P., pp. 271–89. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Goolsby, B. A., Shapiro, K. L., Silvert, L., Kiss, M., Fragopanagos, N., Taylor, J. G., Eimer, M., Nobre, A. C. & Raymond, J. E. (2009) Feature-based inhibition underlies the affective consequences of attention. Visual Cognition 17:500–30.Google Scholar
Heerebout, B. T. & Phaf, R. H. (2010a) Emergent oscillations in evolutionary simulations: Oscillating networks increase switching efficacy. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22:807–23.Google Scholar
Heerebout, B. T. & Phaf, R. H. (2010b) Good vibrations switch attention: An affective function for network oscillations in evolutionary simulations. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience 10:217–29.Google Scholar
Heerebout, B. T., Tap, A. E. Y., Rotteveel, M. & Phaf, R. H. (2013) Gamma flicker elicits positive affect without awareness. Consciousness and Cognition 22:281–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murre, J., Phaf, R. & Wolters, G. (1992) CALM: Categorizing and learning module. Neural Networks 5:55–82.Google Scholar
Pessoa, L. (2008) On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nature 9:148–58.Google ScholarPubMed
Phaf, R. H. & Rotteveel, M. (2005) Affective modulation of recognition bias. Emotion 5:309–18.Google Scholar
Phaf, R. H. & Rotteveel, M. (2012) Affective monitoring: A generic mechanism for affect elicitation. Frontiers in Psychology 3:47. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00047.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phaf, R. H., Van der Heijden, A. H. C. & Hudson, P. T. (1990) SLAM: A connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks. Cognitive Psychology 22:273–341.Google Scholar
Raymond, J. E., Fenske, M. J. & Tavassoli, N. T. (2003) Selective attention determines emotional responses to novel visual stimuli. Psychological Science 14:537–42.Google Scholar
Rotteveel, M. & Phaf, R. H. (2007) Mere exposure in reverse: Mood and motion modulate memory bias. Cognition and Emotion 21:1323–46.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, N. & Hanif, A. (2010) Global-happy and local-sad: Perceptual processing affects emotion identification. Cognition and Emotion 24:1062–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, M. R. & Mather, M. (under review) Both positive and negative arousing sounds increase the impact of visual salience.Google Scholar