We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Since democratization, political parties in Argentina and Chile have pursued different policy strategies to win the support of voters, with party switching characterizing the former and policy stability in the latter. Our framework proposes that such policy differences are closely related to the constraints and opportunities that are provided by non-policy endowments. Here, we describe the effect of non-policy endowments on the parties’ ability to switch their prior policy positions using our model to define the optimal policy offer that parties should make given their non-policy advantages or disadvantages as well as the presence of non-policy heterogeneity among voters’ preferences. In so doing, we describe biases in policy responsiveness derived from the different sensitivity of richer or poorer voters to policy and non-policy offers by parties in either country. We end by discussing whether non-policy incentives shape the observable strategies of politicians in Argentina and Chile and how they may differ from their optimal choices, as well as the implications of our analysis for the subsequent political evolution of parties in both countries.
A number of scholars have analysed lynching in Latin America as a response to the recent upsurge in insecurity and crime in the region. This article turns our attention to historical and deeper socio-political undercurrents behind this practice. Drawing on several cases of lynching that took place in post-revolutionary Puebla, the article argues that, rather than signalling state absence, the occurrence of lynching expressed communities’ reactions towards a state presence that was perceived as intrusive and illegitimate. It furthermore shows that lynchings emulated the brutality and visibility of extralegal forms of violence perpetrated by public officials at the local level.