In fluid dynamics, helicity measures the correlation between velocity and its curl, vorticity, over a spatial volume. Under ‘ideal’ conditions (vanishing viscosity and either homogeneneous density or when pressure may be regarded as a function of density alone), helicity is a topological invariant closely related to the knottedness of vortex lines (Moffatt 1969 J. Fluid Mech. 35 (1), 117–129). Helicity is conserved following a material volume for compact vorticity distributions, i.e. when the vorticity field is tangent to the surface of the volume. There is a related helicity invariant in ideal magnetohydrodynamics involving the correlation between the magnetic potential and its curl, the magnetic field. Helicity is a fragile invariant in the sense that relaxing any one of the ideal conditions results in non-conservation. Unlike energy and enstrophy (mean-square vorticity), helicity is not positive (or sign) definite. Viscous diffusion can create both positive and negative helicity when vortex lines reconnect, something which is topologically forbidden in an ideal fluid where vortex lines move as material curves. Moreover, variable density or more generally compressibility destroys conservation and weakens the association between helicity and vortex-line topology. Furthermore, in compressible flows, the velocity field is not entirely determined from the vorticity field. A recent paper by Boutros & Gibbon (2025) J. Fluid Mech. in this journal explains how one can extend the definition of helicity to control and limit the non-conservation of helicity. This offers a promising way forward in using helicity to characterise flow properties in computational studies of high Reynolds number flows.

A small sphere fixed at various drafts was subjected to unidirectional broad-banded surface gravity wave groups to investigate nonlinear exciting forces. Testing several incident wave phases and amplitudes permitted the separation of nonlinear terms using phase-based harmonic separation methods and amplitude scaling arguments, which identified third-order forces within the wave frequency range, i.e. third-order first-harmonic forces. A small-body approximation with instantaneous volumetric corrections reproduced the third-order first-harmonic heave forces very well in long waves, and at every tested draft. Further analysis of the numerical model shows these effects are primarily due to instantaneous buoyancy changes, which for a spherical geometry possess a cubic relationship with the wave elevation. These third-order effects may be important for applications such as heaving point absorber wave energy converters, where they reduce the first-harmonic exciting force by ${\sim} 10\, \%$ in energetic operational conditions, an important consideration for power capture.

The hydrodynamic forces acting on an undulating swimming fish consist of two components: a drag-based resistive force, and a reactive force originating from the necessary acceleration of an added mass of water. Lighthill’s elongated-body theory, based on potential flow, provides a framework for calculating this reactive force. By leveraging the high aspect ratio of most fish, the theory simplifies the problem into a series of independent two-dimensional slices of fluids along the fish’s body, which exchange momentum with the body and neighbouring slices. Using momentum conservation arguments, Lighthill’s theory predicts the total thrust generated by an undulating fish, based solely on the dimensions and kinematics of its caudal fin. However, the assumption of independent slices has led to the common misconception that the flow produced lacks a longitudinal component. In this paper, we revisit Lighthill’s theory, offering a modern reinterpretation using essential singularities of potential flows. We then extend it to predict the full three-dimensional flow field induced by the fish’s body motion. Our results compare favourably with numerical simulations of realistic fish geometries.