Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-mggfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-21T10:18:26.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Connecting theories of personality dynamics and mental computational processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2025

Juliette L. Ratchford Open the ORCID record for Juliette L. Ratchford [Opens in a new window]  and
Eranda Jayawickreme Open the ORCID record for Eranda Jayawickreme [Opens in a new window]
Juliette L. Ratchford*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA [email protected] [email protected] https://jayawide.sites.wfu.edu/ Program for Leadership and Character, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
Eranda Jayawickreme
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA [email protected] [email protected] https://jayawide.sites.wfu.edu/ Program for Leadership and Character, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Whole Trait Theory (and other dynamic theories of personality) can illuminate the process by which motivational states become traits. Mental computational processes constitute part of the explanatory mechanisms that drive trait manifestations. Empirical work on Whole Trait Theory may inform future research directions on mental computational processes.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 48 , 2025 , e39
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fleeson, W. (2001). Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 1011–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleeson, W., & Gallagher, P. (2009). The implications of Big Five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: Fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1097–1114. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016786CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleeson, W., & Jayawickreme, E. (2015). Whole trait theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 82–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleeson, W., & Jayawickreme, E. (2021a). Whole trait theory puts dynamics at the core of structure. In The handbook of personality dynamics and processes (pp. 579–599). Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleeson, W., & Jayawickreme, E. (2021b). Whole traits: Revealing the social-cognitive mechanisms constituting personality's central variable. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 63, pp. 69–128). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fleeson, W., & Noftle, E. (2008). The end of the person–situation debate: An emerging synthesis in the answer to the consistency question. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(4), 1667–1684. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00122.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayawickreme, E., Fleeson, W., Beck, E. D., Baumert, A., & Adler, J. M. (2021). Personality dynamics. Personality Science, 2, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5964/ps.6179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, K. O., & Fleeson, W. (2012). What is extraversion for? Integrating trait and motivational perspectives and identifying the purpose of extraversion. Psychological Science, 23(12), 1498–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612444904CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCabe, K. O., & Fleeson, W. (2016). Are traits useful? Explaining trait manifestations as tools in the pursuit of goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(2), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039490CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNiel, J. M., Lowman, J. C., & Fleeson, W. (2010). The effect of state extraversion on four types of affect. European Journal of Personality, 24(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.738CrossRefGoogle Scholar