Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-vmclg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-16T21:39:49.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The now and future of social robots as depictions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2023

Bertram F. Malle Open the ORCID record for Bertram F. Malle [Opens in a new window]  and
Xuan Zhao
Bertram F. Malle
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA [email protected] http://bit.ly/bfmalle
Xuan Zhao
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA [email protected] https://www.xuan-zhao.com/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The authors at times propose that robots are mere depictions of social agents (a philosophical claim) and at other times that people conceive of social robots as depictions (an empirical psychological claim). We evaluate each claim's accuracy both now and in the future and, in doing so, we introduce two dangerous misperceptions people have, or will have, about social robots.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e39
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Darling, K. (2016). Extending legal protection to social robots: The effects of anthropomorphism, empathy, and violent behavior towards robotic objects. In Calo, R., Froomkin, A. M., & Kerr, I. (Eds.), Robot Law (pp. 213–232). Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781783476732.00017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, M. J., Mann, T. C., Cone, J., & Shen, X. (2019). When and how implicit first impressions can be updated. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(4), 331–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419835206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley.10.1037/10628-000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malle, B. F. (2019). How many dimensions of mind perception really are there? In Goel, E. K., Seifert, C. M., & Freksa, C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 2268–2274). Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Malle, B. F., Fischer, K., Young, J. E., Moon, A. J., & Collins, E. C. (2020). Trust and the discrepancy between expectations and actual capabilities of social robots. In Zhang, D. & Wei, B. (Eds.), Human–robot interaction: Control, analysis, and design (pp. 1–23). Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Rosenthal-von der Pütten, A. M., Krämer, N. C., Hoffmann, L., Sobieraj, S., & Eimler, S. C. (2013). An experimental study on emotional reactions towards a robot. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-012-0173-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, R. N. (1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science (New York, N.Y.), 237(4820), 1317–1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisman, K., Dweck, C. S., & Markman, E. M. (2017). Rethinking people's conceptions of mental life. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(43), 11374–11379. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704347114CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, X., & Malle, B. F. (2022). Spontaneous perspective taking toward robots: The unique impact of humanlike appearance. Cognition, 224, 105076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105076CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, X., Phillips, E., & Malle, B. F. (2019). How people infer a humanlike mind from a robot body [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w6r24CrossRefGoogle Scholar