No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Meta-cognition about social robots could be difficult, making self-reports about some cognitive processes less useful
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2023
Abstract
There are reasons to suspect that meta-cognition about construing social robots as depictions would be more difficult – or absent – than Clark and Fischer discuss. Self-reports about the cognitive processes involved might therefore tend to be incomplete or inaccurate, limiting their usefulness as measures.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Remmers, P. (2020). The artificial nature of social robots: A phenomenological interpretation of two conflicting tendencies in human-robot interaction. In Culturally sustainable social robotics (pp. 78–85). IOS Press.Google Scholar
Rueben, M., Klow, J., Duer, M., Zimmerman, E., Piacentini, J., Browning, M., … Smart, W. D. (2021). Mental models of a mobile shoe rack: Exploratory findings from a long-term in-the-wild study. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), 10(2), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thellman, S. (2021). Social robots as intentional agents. Doctoral dissertation, Linköping University Electronic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thellman, S., de Graaf, M., & Ziemke, T. (2021). Mental state attribution to robots: A systematic review of conceptions, methods, and findings. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), 11(4), 1–51.Google Scholar
Złotowski, J., Proudfoot, D., Yogeeswaran, K., & Bartneck, C. (2015). Anthropomorphism: Opportunities and challenges in human-robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(3), 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Złotowski, J., Sumioka, H., Eyssel, F., Nishio, S., Bartneck, C., & Ishiguro, H. (2018). Model of dual anthropomorphism: The relationship between the media equation effect and implicit anthropomorphism. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10(5), 701–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Target article
Social robots as depictions of social agents
Related commentaries (29)
A more ecological perspective on human–robot interactions
A neurocognitive view on the depiction of social robots
Anthropomorphism, not depiction, explains interaction with social robots
Autonomous social robots are real in the mind's eye of many
Binding paradox in artificial social realities
Children's interactions with virtual assistants: Moving beyond depictions of social agents
Cues trigger depiction schemas for robots, as they do for human identities
Dancing robots: Social interactions are performed, not depicted
Depiction as possible phase in the dynamics of sociomorphing
Fictional emotions and emotional reactions to social robots as depictions of social agents
How cultural framing can bias our beliefs about robots and artificial intelligence
How deep is AI's love? Understanding relational AI
How puzzling is the social artifact puzzle?
Interacting with characters redux
Meta-cognition about social robots could be difficult, making self-reports about some cognitive processes less useful
Of children and social robots
On the potentials of interaction breakdowns for HRI
People treat social robots as real social agents
Social robots and the intentional stance
Social robots as social learning partners: Exploring children's early understanding and learning from social robots
Taking a strong interactional stance
The Dorian Gray Refutation
The now and future of social robots as depictions
The second-order problem of other minds
Trait attribution explains human–robot interactions
Unpredictable robots elicit responsibility attributions
Virtual and real: Symbolic and natural experiences with social robots
When Pinocchio becomes a real boy: Capability and felicity in AI and interactive depictions
“Who's there?”: Depicting identity in interaction
Author response
On depicting social agents